The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Evseev E.P.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Balakin E.V.

Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery

Aidamirov Ya.A.

Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery

Ivanova E.V.

Institute for Cellular and Intracellular Symbiosis of Ural Division of RAS

Kondratiev D.A.

Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery

Ivanov V.A.

Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery

Belov Yu.V.

Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Surgical treatment of heart diseases through the right-sided minithoracotomy

Authors:

Evseev E.P., Balakin E.V., Aidamirov Ya.A., Ivanova E.V., Kondratiev D.A., Ivanov V.A., Belov Yu.V.

More about the authors

Read: 2883 times


To cite this article:

Evseev EP, Balakin EV, Aidamirov YaA, Ivanova EV, Kondratiev DA, Ivanov VA, Belov YuV. Surgical treatment of heart diseases through the right-sided minithoracotomy. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021;14(1):26‑31. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio20211401126

Recommended articles:
Imme­diate resu­lts of mitral and aortic valve replacement with simu­ltaneous Cox-Maze IV procedure. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(1):28-33
Implantation of mitral allo­graft into tricuspid valve posi­tion for active infe­ctive endo­carditis. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(2):230-236
Long-term asymptomatic course of large myxoma in the right atrium. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(3):366-370
Long-term resu­lts of multivalvular correction of heart defe­cts. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(10-2):35-41
A clinical case of ischemic stroke in a patient with cardiac myxoma. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(12-2):30-35

Background

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has recently become more and more popular. Despite median sternotomy as the most common approach to the heart, alternative approaches, in particular minithoracotomy, are being used more and more often. The first procedures for congenital and acquired heart diseases via right-sided minithoracotomy were performed in the mid-90s [1—3]. Currently, new technologies of cardiopulmonary bypass, special surgical instruments and thoracoscopic assistance ensure more favorable outcomes after minimally invasive surgery. Right-sided minithoracotomy has a number of advantages compared to median sternotomy: reduced surgical trauma, preserved chest stability, reduced postoperative pain syndrome, accelerated postoperative recovery, reduced number of infectious complications and excellent cosmetic effect. However, there are some disadvantages too: higher duration of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischemia [4—7].

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immediate results of heart valve repair through right-sided minithoracotomy in our center.

Material and methods

Patient characteristics

There were 41 interventions via right-sided minithoracotomy for the period from July 2017 to March 2020 in our department. The sample included 11 men (26.8%) and 30 women (73.2%). Age of patients ranged from 17 to 74 years (mean 49.5 ± 13.6 years). Mitral valve disease was diagnosed in 27 (65.9%) patients, atrial septal defect — 10 (24.4%) patients, myxoma — 2 (4.9%) patients, tricuspid valve disease — 1 (2.4%) patient, mitral valve disease with atrial septal defect — 1 (2.4%) patient. Preoperative characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 1. Left ventricular ejection fraction was normal (mean 63.7 ± 4.8% (range 55 — 75%)). Most patients had heart failure NYHA class III (56.1%). In 28 patients with mitral valve diseases, the etiological factors were as follows: connective tissue dysplasia — 18 (64.3%) cases, chronic rheumatic heart disease — 6 (21.4%) cases, secondary infective endocarditis in remission — 4 (14.3% ) case. Tricuspid valve disease was caused by secondary infective endocarditis in remission in a patient with connective tissue dysplasia. Euroscore II value ranged from 0.5 to 2.75% (mean 1.04 ± 0.5%), i.e. there was low surgical risk in all cases.

Table 1. Preoperative characteristics of patients

Variable

Value

Number of patients, n

41

Male, n (٪)

11 (26.8)

Female, n (٪)

30 (73.2)

Age, years

49.5±13.6

BMI, kg/m٢

25.3±3.8

BSA, m٢

1.86±0.19

CHF NYHA class I, n (٪)

8 (19.5)

CHF NYHA class II, n (٪)

10 (24.4)

CHF NYHA class III, n (٪)

23 (56.1)

Comorbidities

Hypertension, n (٪)

13 (31.7)

CAD, n (٪)

1 (2.4)

Atherosclerosis, n (٪)

14 (34.1)

Chronic kidney disease, n (٪)

5 (12.2)

Diabetes mellitus, n (٪)

2 (4.9)

COPD, n (٪)

3 (7.3)

Obesity, n (٪)

5 (12.2)

AF, n (٪)

10 (24.4)

Pulmonary hypertension, n (٪)

21 (51.2)

LV ejection fraction, ٪

63.7±4.8

LV EDD, cm

5.3±0.8

LV ESD, cm

3.4±0.6

LA dimension, cm

4.6±0.9

LA volume, ml

120±64

Euroscore II, %

1.04±0.5

Note: BMI — body mass index, BSA — body surface area, CAD — coronary artery disease, COPD — chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, AF — atrial fibrillation, EDD — end-diastolic dimension, ESD — end-systolic dimension, LA — left atrium.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using parametric and nonparametric methods. Accumulation, correction, systematization of initial data and visualization of results were performed in Microsoft Office Excel 2007 spreadsheets. Statistical analysis was carried out using the IBM SPSS Statistics v.23 software (IBM Corporation). In case of normal distribution, quantitative variables were pooled in variational series with calculation of mean (M) and standard deviations (SD).

Surgical features

Induction anesthesia was ensured in accordance with standard protocol and bilateral mechanical ventilation. The patient’s position was left posterior oblique under 20—30°. External defibrillator pads were used. Surgical field wrapping was preceded by marking of chest and inguinal incisions, jugular notch and xiphoid process (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Surgical team location.

A 5—6-cm skin incision was made under the right mammary gland. Then, soft tissues were displaced and thoracotomy was performed in the 4th intercostal space after preliminary lung deflation. Simultaneously, we performed surgical approach to the right femoral vessels. Pericardiotomy and imposing of stay-sutures were followed by deployment of silicone Soft Tissue retractor and hard retractor. Flexible 5-mm thoracoscopic system can be used for visualization convenience. Optic visualization was ensured through the main incision. CPB was established in “femoral artery — femoral vein” scheme. Venous cannula positioning was controlled by transesophageal echocardiography. Chitwood aortic clamp was inserted through an additional 1-cm incision in the 5th – 6th intercostal space along the middle axillary line. Aortic cross-clamping was followed by non-selective antegrade cardioplegia through a cardioplegia cannula. Custodiol was used for heart valve surgery. In other cases, we applied blood cardioplegia. Blood cardioplegia was accompanied by normothermic perfusion, crystalloid cardioplegia — hypothermia 32°C. We used left atriotomy along the interatrial sulcus for mitral valve repair and right atriotomy along the interatrial sulcus in other cases. Stay-sutures were imposed on the atrial wall and a retractor was placed into the atrial cavity. Atrial drainage was performed through an atriotomy. Then, we performed the main surgical stage (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Surgical wound.

All knots were extracorporeal and tightened using a pusher. Cardioplegia cannula was removed on-pump with adequate hemostasis. All patients underwent fixation of myocardial electrodes to the right ventricular myocardium and pericardium. Pericardium was sutured using interrupted sutures. Pleural drainage was carried out through the aperture for aortic clamp.

Results

Surgical procedures are presented in Table 2. Mean time of surgery was — 265 ± 73 min (range 165 — 578 min), CPB — 121 ± 42 min (range 55 — 246 min), aortic cross-clamping — 89 ± 32 min (range 33 — 169 min).

Table 2. Surgical procedures

Surgery

Number

Mitral valve replacement, n (٪)

17 (41.5)

Mitral valve repair, n (٪)

10 (24.4)

Patch repair of atrial septal defect, n (٪)

8 (19.5)

Patch repair of atrial septal defect, DeVega tricuspid valve repair, n (٪)

2 (4.9)

Resection of LA myxoma, n (٪)

2 (4.9)

Tricuspid valve replacement, n (٪)

1 (2.4)

Mitral valve and atrial septal defect repair, n (٪)

1 (2.4)

Note: LA — left atrium.

Mean blood loss was 592 ± 206 ml (range 300 — 1300 ml). Inotropic and vasopressor support in early postoperative period was required in 6 (14.6%) cases. Mean ICU-stay was 1.1 ± 0.4 days (range 1 — 3 days).

Fig. 3. Duration of mitral valve repair, cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischemia depending on surgical experience.

Conversion of surgical approach was performed in 2 (4.9%) cases. The first one was a 36-year-old patient with mitral valve disease following connective tissue dysplasia. Intraoperative examination revealed thickened mitral leaflet, myxomatous changes and elongation of subvalvular structures. Mitral valve repair with a Carpentier-Edwards 32 mm annuloplasty ring was performed. Hydraulic test confirmed adequate valve closure. However, CPB weaning was followed by TEE data on severe mitral insufficiency due to A2 chord detachment. Median sternotomy was followed by mitral valve replacement with a Carbomedics Optiform 27 mm mechanical prosthesis. Time of surgery was 578 min, CPB — 210 + 74 min, aortic cross-clamping — 149 + 57 min. Postoperative period was complicated by right-sided pneumonia. The patient was discharged in 15 days after surgery. This was the second surgery through the minithoracotomy.

The second case of conversion was a 61-year-old patient with mitral valve disease and funnel chest. We decided to start surgery through the right-sided minithoracotomy with possible enlargement up to complete thoracotomy. Unfortunately, visualization of the atrium was unsatisfactory. Surgical approach was enlarged up to complete thoracotomy and mitral valve replacement with a Carbomedics Optiform 29 mm mechanical prosthesis was carried out. Surgery time was 407 min, CPB — 246 min, aortic cross-clamping — 169 min. Postoperative period was complicated by right-sided pneumonia and hydrothorax, that required pleural drainage. The patient was discharged in 11 days after surgery. This surgery through the minithoracotomy was the ninth. Characteristics of postoperative complications are presented in Table 3. Various postoperative complications occurred in 12 (29.3%) patients. There was no mortality. Mean postoperative hospital-stay was 6.5 ± 2.1 days (range 3 — 15 days).

Table 3. Postoperative complications

Complication

Number

Pneumonia, n (٪)

2 (4.9)

Postoperative wound suppuration, n (٪)

1 (2.4)

Postoperative delirium, n (٪)

2 (4.9)

Subcutaneous emphysema, n (٪)

3 (7.3)

Paroxysmal AF (chemical cardioversion), n (٪)

5 (12.2)

Note: LA — left atrium.

Postoperative scar 1 month later is shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Postoperative scar in 1 month after surgery.

Discussion

Various studies devoted to heart valve surgery through alternative approaches to median sternotomy have appeared since 1996 [1]. Navia J. and Cosgrove D. [8] reported a right parasternal approach. However, this method required resection of III-IV rib cartilages and ligation of the right internal thoracic artery. Loulmet D. et al. [9] described partial sternotomy with ligation of the right internal thoracic artery. We use the right-sided anterior minithoracotomy in the 4th intercostal space proposed by Carpentier. In contrast to parasternal approach and partial sternotomy, this technique does not require resection of cartilages or ribs, as well as ligation of the right internal thoracic artery. Moreover, this approach preserves chest function. Another advantage is available fast conversion to thoracotomy. Despite small incision of 6—7 cm, exposure of mitral, tricuspid valves and interatrial septum is satisfactory. There is no excessive traction of ribs and chest tissues that reduces postoperative pain and improves quality of life [10].

Indications for heart valve surgery through a right-sided minithoracotomy in our study were the same as for traditional approach through a median sternotomy. According to various authors, contraindications for surgery through a right-sided minithoracotomy are peripheral artery disease with lesions of femoral and iliac arteries, previous chest irradiation, adhesions in the right pleural cavity, mitral annulus calcification, severe scoliosis and chest abnormalities [11, 12]. In our study, there were patients with scoliosis that impaired exposure and prolonged surgery. There was also a patient with a funnel chest deformity. An exposure was so unsatisfactory that conversion to thoracotomy was required. Thus, severe chest deformities require careful preoperative analysis due to possible contraindications for minimally invasive approach.

Endovascular treatment of ASD with occluders is currently preferred. However, surgery via minithoracotomy is an acceptable alternative in case of technical impossibility of endovascular procedure [13]. In our study, there was no at least one rim of ASD in all cases. Therefore, endovascular closure was accompanied by certain technical difficulties. However, surgery through minithoracotomy was effective even for ASD combined with partial abnormal drainage of pulmonary veins.

Resection of myxoma trough a right-sided minithoracotomy is largely limited by dimension and localization of tumor. Lee N. et al. [14] reported less time of CPB and aortic cross-clamping for sternotomy while postoperative blood loss and incidence of arrhythmias were less in the minithoracotomy group. Hospital-stay and mortality were similar. In our study, there were 2 cases of LA myxoma and no complications. Further follow-up is required, but early outcomes suggest minithoracotomy is a possible alternative to sternotomy.

Many authors describe a learning curve for surgery through minithoracotomy. The number of interventions required to master the technique varies and, apparently, depends on individual characteristics of surgeon. Mitral valve replacement is recommended at initial stages since this procedure is technically easier than mitral valve repair [15, 16]. According to our data, duration of surgery is gradually decreased over time. Further researches are required to estimate the length of learning curve.

Conclusion

Cardiac surgery through a right-sided minithoracotomy is safe and effective alternative to median sternotomy. This approach preserves chest stability, accelerated postoperative recovery and has an excellent cosmetic effect. Severe chest deformities require careful preoperative planning as relative contraindications for right-sided minithoracotomy. Unsatisfactory visualization can require conversion to complete thoracotomy. Accumulation of experience reduces duration of these procedures.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References:

  1. Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, et al. Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success. C R Acad Sci III. 1996;319(3):219-223. 
  2. Wu Y. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery for intracardiac congenital lesions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14:154-159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(98)00125-0
  3. Chau-Hsiung C, Lin PJ, Chu J-J, et al. Video-Assisted Cardiac Surgery in Closure of Atrial Septal Defect. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(3):697-701.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(96)00461-4
  4. Aybek T, Dogan S, Risteski PS, et al. Two Hundred Forty Minimally Invasive Mitral Operations Through Right Minithoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(5):1618-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.12.006
  5. Enginoev ST, Kozmin DYu, Magomedov GM, Makeev SA, Ilov NN, Chernov II, Tarasov DG. Comparative analysis of minithoracotomy and sternotomy in the pathology of mitral valve — the experience of one center Grudnaya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2019;61(4):323-327. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24022/0236-2791-2019-61-4-323-327
  6. Skopin II, Narsiya BE, Vavilov AV, Latyshev MS. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Grudnaya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2017;59(4):238-245. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24022/0236-2791-2017-59-4-238-245
  7. Shcherbatyuk KV, Komarov RN, Pidanov OYu. Right thoracotomy approach for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal imeni N.I. Pirogova. 2019;12:121-125. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2019121121
  8. Navia JL, Cosgrove DM. Minimally invasive mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(5):1542-1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(96)00779-5
  9. Loulmet DF, Carpentier A, Cho PW, et al. Less invasive techniques for mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115(4):772-779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70354-X
  10. Yamada T, Ochiai R, Takeda J, Shin H, Yozu R. Comparison of early postoperative quality of life in minimally invasive versus conventional valve surgery. J Anesth. 2003;17(3):171-176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-003-0176-6
  11. Kastengren M, Svenarud P, Ahlsson A, Dalén M. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is associated with a low rate of complications. J Intern Med. 2019;286(6):614-626.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12974
  12. Pojar M, Vojacek J, Karalko M, Turek Z. Single-Center Experience with Minimally Invasive Mitral Operations through Right Minithoracotomy. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;25(1):18-25.  https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.18-00100
  13. Wadhawa V, Doshi C, Hinduja M, et al. Anterior Minithoracotomy: a Safe Approach for Surgical ASD Closure & ASD Device Retrieval. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;32(4):270-275.  https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0024
  14. Lee HP, Cho WC, Kim JB, et al. Surgical Outcomes of Cardiac Myxoma: Right Minithoracotomy Approach versus Median Sternotomy Approach. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;49(5):356-360.  https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.5.356
  15. Wu X, Wei W, He Y, Qin H, Qi F. Analysis of the Learning Curve in Mitral Valve Replacement Through the Right Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Approach: A Surgeon’s Experience with the First 100 Patients. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(3):471-476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.02.002
  16. Vo AT, Nguyen DH, Van Hoang S, et al. Learning curve in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a single-center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-1038-0

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.