The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Sagirova Zh.N.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Kuznetsova N.O.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Larionov V.B.

CardioQVARK LLC, Moscow, Russia

Chomakhidze P.Sh.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Kopylov F.Iu.

Pervyĭ MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova, kafedra profilakticheskoĭ i neotlozhnoĭ kardiologii FPPOV, Moskva

Syrkin A.L.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Pulse wave parameters in assessment of left ventricular systolic function

Authors:

Sagirova Zh.N., Kuznetsova N.O., Larionov V.B., Chomakhidze P.Sh., Kopylov F.Iu., Syrkin A.L.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;13(3): 253‑257

DOI: 10.17116/kardio202013031253

Views: 18285

Downloaded: 488

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Sagirova ZhN, Kuznetsova NO, Larionov VB, Chomakhidze PSh, Kopylov FIu, Syrkin AL. Pulse wave parameters in assessment of left ventricular systolic function. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;13(3):253‑257. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio202013031253

 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Asse­ssment of central hemo­dynamic para­meters after pulmonary thro­mbendarterectomy in patients with chro­nic thro­mboembolic pulmonary hype­rtension. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;(6):637-645
Myocardial force and energy consumption as predictors of coro­nary flow reco­very in patients with coro­nary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(1):73-78
Cardiotropic effect of natu­ral nitric oxide donor in doxo­rubicin cardiomyopathy. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2024;(2):27-31
Prognostic value of solu­ble biomarkers of haemodynamic stress, inflammation and fibrosis in hfpef: a retrospective cohort study. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2024;(2):47-54
Stru­ctural-functional status of cardiovascular and respiratory systems, psychoemotional diso­rders in patients with COVID-19 at the time of hospital discharge. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2024;(5):60-68
Pathophysiological mechanisms of vascular wall alte­rations in meno­pausal women. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2024;(6):91-97
The pote­ntials of the six-minute walking test in clinical practice auto­matization and adva­nced features. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2024;(12):122-127
Cuffless methods of blood pressure measurements. Review of modern technologies. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2024;(12):156-162
Left ventricular myocardial performance index (Tei index) as an early marker of cardiotoxicity in anti­tumor therapy. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2024;(4-2):137-143
Asse­ssment study on effect of omega-3 polyu­nsaturated fatty acids intake on cardiovascular system performance in men born in the Far East. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(2):46-52

Evaluation of hemodynamic parameters is essential in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Diagnosis, follow-up and correction of therapy for cardiac failure, coronary artery disease and arterial hypertension are based on permanent monitoring of hemodynamic parameters (volumetric and linear blood flow velocity, systolic and diastolic function, peripheral vascular resistance and systemic blood pressure). Fast and non-invasive hemodynamic assessment is possible via analysis of pulse wave features. The last one may be recorded by various methods including an individual device with the function of photoplethysmography. Development of the algorithms for this examination and their validation are actual and significant objectives.

Keywords:

hemodynamics
pulse wave
systolic function
myocardium
echocardiography
photoplethysmography
pulse wave propagation speed
blood flow velocity
vascular elasticity

Authors:

Sagirova Zh.N.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Kuznetsova N.O.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Larionov V.B.

CardioQVARK LLC, Moscow, Russia

Chomakhidze P.Sh.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Kopylov F.Iu.

Pervyĭ MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova, kafedra profilakticheskoĭ i neotlozhnoĭ kardiologii FPPOV, Moskva

Syrkin A.L.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

List of references:

  1. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiography. 2006;7(2):79-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euje.2005.12.014
  2. Rybakova MK, Alekhin MN, Mitkov VV. Ekhokardiografiya. M.: Vidar-M; 2016. (In Russ.).
  3. Voigt J-U, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. European Heart Journal — Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu184
  4. Marwick TH, Gillebert TC, Aurigemma G, et al. Recommendations on the use of echocardiography in adult hypertension: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE). European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;16(6):577-605. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev076
  5. Khadzegova AB, Yuschuk EN, Gabitova RG, Sinitsina IA, Ivanova SV, Vasyuk YuA. Assessment of the left ventricle systolic function with ultrasound 2d-strain technology in arterial hypertension. Russ J Cardiol. 2016;12(140):7-11. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2016-12-7-11
  6. Pattynama PM, Lamb HJ, van der Velde EA, et al. Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MR imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. Radiology. 1993;187:(1):261-268. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.187.1.8451425
  7. Schwitter J, Arai AE. Assessment of cardiac ischaemia and viability: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. European Heart Journal. 2011;32(7):799-809. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq481
  8. Agadzhanyan NA, Torshin VI, Vlasova VM. Osnovy’ fiziologii cheloveka. M.: RUDN. 2001. (In Russ.).
  9. Asmar R, Rudnichi A, et al. Pulse pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity are markers of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive populations. Am J Hypertens. 2001;14(2):91-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7061(00)01232-2
  10. Ol’binskaya LI. Obshhnost’ patogeneza arterial’noj gipertenzii i xronicheskoj serdechnoj nedostatochnosti. Serdechnaya nedostatochnost’. 2002;3:1(11):17-18. (In Russ.).
  11. Usanov DA, Skripal’ AV, Vagarin AYu, Ry’tik AP. Metody’ i apparatura dlya diagnostiki sostoyaniya serdechno-sosudistoj sistemy’ po xarakteristikam pul’sovoj volny’. Saratov: Saratovskij gosudarstvenny’j universitet; 2009. (In Russ.).
  12. Oliver JJ, Webb DJ. Noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness and risk of atherosclerotic events. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2003;23(4):554. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000060460.52916.D6
  13. Mattace-Raso F, Tischa JM, Hofman A, et al. Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke, the Rotterdam study. Circulation. 2006;113(5):657-663. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.555235
  14. Mikael LR, Paiva AMG, Gomes MM, Sousa ALL, et al. Vascular aging and arterial stiffness. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 2017;109(3):253-258. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170091
  15. Gurfinkel YI, Katse NV, Parfenova LM, Ivanova IY, Orlov VA. Pulse wave velocity and endothelial function comparison in healthy people and cardiovascular patients. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2009;2:38-43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2009-2-38-43
  16. Gomyranova NV, Perova NV, Alexandrovitch OV, Evstafieva OL, Metelskaya VA. Correlates of pulse wave velocity with risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus. The Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 2017;20(3):28-33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed201720328-33
  17. Ikonomidis I, Katsanos S, et al. Pulse wave velocity to global longitudinal strain ratio in hypertension. Eur J Clin Invest. 2019; 49(2):e.13049. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13049
  18. Kim D, Shim CY, et al. Differences in left ventricular functional adaptation to arterial stiffness and neurohormonal activation in patients with hypertension: a study with two-dimensional layer-specific speckle tracking echocardiography. Clinical Hypertension. 2017;23:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-017-0078-9
  19. Sugawara J, Tanabe T, Miyachi M, et al. Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output during exercise in healthy young humans: comparison between modelflow method and doppler echocardiography method. Acta Physiol Scand. 2003;179:361-366. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0001-6772.2003.01211.x
  20. Lowres N, Neubeck L, Salkeld G, et al. Feasibility and cost-effectiveness of stroke prevention through community screening for atrial fibrillation using iPhone ECG in pharmacies. The SEARCH-AF Study. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2014;111(6):1167-1176. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH14-03-0231
  21. Kearley K, Selwood M, Van den BA, et al. Triage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single-lead ECG and modified BP monitors. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004565. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004565
  22. Kaleschke G, Hoffmann B, Drewitz I, et al. Prospective, multicentre validation of a simple, patient-operated electrocardiographic system for the detection of arrhythmias and electrocardiographic changes. Europace. 2009;11(10):1362-1368. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup262
  23. Garabelli P, Stavrakis S, Albert M, et al. Comparison of QT Interval Readings in Normal Sinus Rhythm Between a Smartphone Heart Monitor and a 12‐Lead ECG for Healthy Volunteers and Inpatients Receiving Sotalol or Dofetilide. Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2016;27(7):827-832. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12976

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.