The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Ageev F.T.

National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia.

Silvestrova G.A.

National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia.

Shamrina N.S.

National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia.

Shiryaev A.A.

Institute of the Clinical Cardiology named after A.L. Myasnikov of National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Moscow, Russia

Matchin Yu.G.

Institute of Cardiology named after A.L. Myasnikov of National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, 3-rd Cherepkovskay St., 15a, Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation

Approach through forearm arteries for diagnostic and curative endovascular interventions on coronary bypasses

Authors:

Ageev F.T., Silvestrova G.A., Shamrina N.S., Shiryaev A.A., Matchin Yu.G.

More about the authors

Read: 3092 times


To cite this article:

Ageev FT, Silvestrova GA, Shamrina NS, Shiryaev AA, Matchin YuG. Approach through forearm arteries for diagnostic and curative endovascular interventions on coronary bypasses. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2012;5(6):4‑11. (In Russ.)

Recommended articles:
Left ante­rior descending artery and diagonal branch bypass in multiple-vessel coro­nary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;(6):646-650
Radionuclide methods in analysis of myocardial perfusion and meta­bolic acti­vity. Rege­nerative Biotechnologies, Preventive, Digi­tal and Predictive Medi­cine. 2024;(4):12-19
Reclassification of ischemic heart disease epidemiological criteria. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2024;(12):61-68

References:

  1. Louvard Y., Lefévre T. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52 (2): 181-187.
  2. Cruden N.L., Teh C.H., Starkey I.R., Newby D.E. Reduced vascular complications and length of stay with transradial rescue angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70 (5): 670-675.
  3. Brasselet C., Tassan S., Nazeyrollas P., Bauth D. et al. Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI trial. Heart 2007; 93 (12): 1556-1561.
  4. Cooper C.J., El-Shiekh R.A., Cohen D.J. et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J 1999; 138: 430-436.
  5. Mann J.T., Cubeddu G. Right radial access for PTCA: a prospective study demonstrates reduced complications and hospital charges. J Invas Cardiol 1996;8:40-4D.
  6. Dowling K., Todd D., Schneider J.E. et al. Early ambulation after diagnostic angiography using 4-F catheters and sheaths: a feasibility study. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 618-621.
  7. Gall S., Tarique A. Rapid ambulation after coronary angiography via femoral artery access: a prospective study of 1,000 patients. J Invasive Cardiol 2006; 18: 106-108.
  8. Seldinger S.I. Catheter placement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography. A new technique. Acta Radiol 1953; 39: 368-376.
  9. Ziakas A., Klinke P. A comparison of the radial and the femoral approach in vein graft PCI. A retrospective study. Int J Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 7 (2): 93-96.
  10. Sanmartin M., Cuevas D. Transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with coronary bypass grafts: feasibility analysis and comparison with transfemoral approach. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67 (4): 580-584.
  11. Burzotta F., Trani C. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions in patients with coronary bypass grafts: tips and tricks. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72 (2): 263-272.
  12. Lee J.H., Kim M.J. The feasibility of bypass graft angiography by right radial access. Kor Circ J 2009; 39 (8): 304-309.
  13. Rathore S., Roberts E. The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route. J Interv Cardiol 2009; 22 (4): 336-340.
  14. Han H., Zhou Y. Safety and Feasibility of Transradial Approach for Coronary Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention. Angiology 2012; 63 (2): 103-108.
  15. Aptecar E., Pernes J.-M. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: The PCVI-CUBA study. Catheteriz Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67 (5): 711-720.
  16. Kiemeneij F., Laarman G.J. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1269-1275.
  17. Benit E., Missault L. Brachial, radial or femoral approach for elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: a randomized comparison. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 41: 124-130.
  18. Jaschtchinski S. Morphologie und topography des Arcus volaris sublimes und profundus des Menschen. Anat Hefte 1897; 161-168.
  19. Koman L.A., Urbaniak J.R. Ulnar artery thrombosis. In: Brunelli G. (ed). Textbook of Microsurgery. Milan (Ital)y: Masson 1988; 75-83.
  20. Vogelzang R. Arteriography of the hand and wrist. Hand Clin 1991; 7: 63-86.
  21. Barbeau G., Arsenault F. Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: Comparison with the Allen's test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J 2004; 147: 489-493.
  22. Grondin C., Campean L. Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after surgery. Circulation 1984; 70 (6): 1208-1212.
  23. Luscher T., Diederich D. Difference between endothelium-dependent relaxation in arterial and in venous coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 1988; 319 (7): 463-467.
  24. Baurassa M., Campean L. Changes in grafts and coronary arteries after saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass surgery: results at repeat angiography. Circulation 1982; 6: 90-97.
  25. Haman D., Racz M., McCallister B. Comparison of three-year survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33 (1): 63-72.
  26. Campeau L., Enjalbert M. Atherosclerosis and late closure of aorto-coronary saphenous vein grafts: seqential angiografic studies at 2 week, 1 year, 5 to 7 years and 10 to 12 years after surgery. Circulation 1983; 68: Suppl II: 1-7.
  27. Silva J., White C.J., Collins T.J. Morphologic comparison of atherosclerotic lesions in native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts with intracoronary angioscopy in patients with unstable angina. Am Heart J 1998; 136 (1): 156-164.
  28. Oncel D., Oncel G. Evaluation of coronary bypass graft occlusion and stenosis with 64-detector-row computed tomography angiography. Acta Radiol 2007; 48: 988-996.
  29. Meyer T.S., Martinoff S. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 946-950.
  30. Ropers D., Pohle F.K. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 2006; 114 :2334-2341.
  31. Hamon M., Lepage O. Diagnostic performance of 16- and 64-section spiral CT for coronary artery bypass graft assessment: meta-analysis. Radiology 2008; 247: 679-686.
  32. Onuma Y., Tanabe K. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Am Heart J 2007; 154: 519-526.
  33. Judkins M.P. Percutaneous transfemoral selective coronary arteriography. Radiol Clin North Am 1968; 6: 467-492.
  34. Koch K.T., Piek J.J. Triage of patients for short term observation after elective coronary angioplasty. Heart 2000; 83: 557-563.
  35. Klinke W.P., Kubac G. Safety of Outpatient Cardiac Cateterization. Am J Cardiol 1985; 56: 639-641.
  36. Matchin Yu.G., Basinkevich A.B. Bezopasnost' i effektivnost' provedeniya diagnosticheskoi koronarografii v ambulatornykh usloviyakh. Kardiol vestn 2008; 1: 35-39.
  37. Cook S., Walker A. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe. Clin Res Cardiol 2007; 96: 375-382.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.