The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.
Lutfarakhmanov I.I.
Bashkir State Medical University
Syrchin E.Yu.
Bashkir State Medical University
Galeev I.R.
Bashkir State Medical University
Pavlov V.N.
Bashkir State Medical University
Central hemodynamic changes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy depending on the type of anesthesia
Journal: Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2020;(6): 69‑76
Views: 2253
Downloaded: 57
To cite this article:
Lutfarakhmanov II, Syrchin EYu, Galeev IR, Mironov PI, Pavlov VN. Central hemodynamic changes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy depending on the type of anesthesia. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology.
2020;(6):69‑76. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202006169
To evaluate the effect of various anesthetic approaches, pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position on central hemodynamic parameters in patients with ASA class II—III undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Fifty-seven patients were included in the groups of inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane or total intravenous anesthesia with propofol (TIVA). Mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were compared between both groups before induction of anesthesia (T1), after tracheal intubation (T2), applying pneumoperitoneum (T3), transferring the patient to Trendelenburg position (T4), during dissection of dorsal venous complex (pneumoperitoneum 25 mm Hg and Trendelenburg position +30°, T5), after transferring to horizontal position (T6) and at the end of surgery (gas desufflation and tracheal extubation, T7 and T8, respectively). Between-group comparisons were made using independent Student’s t-test, within-group comparison — two-sided Bonferroni test.
Central hemodynamic parameters were similar in both groups, except for the time point T3, when MBP, HR and SVR were significantly lower in the TIVA group compared to the inhalational anesthesia group (p<0.01, p<0.05 and p<0.05 respectively). At the time point T4, MBP was the same, but between-group differences in HR was greater (p<0.01). There were no perioperative cardiovascular complications.
The main risk factors of perioperative hemodynamic disorders during RARP are pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position. The type of general anesthesia is not a risk factor.
Keywords:
Authors:
Lutfarakhmanov I.I.
Bashkir State Medical University
Syrchin E.Yu.
Bashkir State Medical University
Galeev I.R.
Bashkir State Medical University
Pavlov V.N.
Bashkir State Medical University
Received:
08.06.2020
Accepted:
24.07.2020
List of references:
Close metadata
Email Confirmation
An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.
Email Confirmation
Log in to the site using your account in one of the services
We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.