The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Kurysheva N.I.

Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the State Research Center — Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency;
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of the Federal Medical Biological Agency;
Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Sharova G.A.

Eye Clinic of Doctor Belikova LLC

Predictors of the success of laser peripheral iridotomy and lensectomy in the early stages of primary angle closure disease

Authors:

Kurysheva N.I., Sharova G.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2023;139(3): 98‑105

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202313903198

Read: 1806 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

PREDICTORS OF THE SUCCESS OF LASER PERIPHERAL IRIDOTOMY AND LENSECTOMY IN THE EARLY STAGES OF PRIMARY ANGLE CLOSURE DISEASE
PREDICTORS OF THE SUCCESS OF LASER PERIPHERAL IRIDOTOMY AND LENSECTOMY IN THE EARLY STAGES OF PRIMARY ANGLE CLOSURE DISEASE

To cite this article:

Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA. Predictors of the success of laser peripheral iridotomy and lensectomy in the early stages of primary angle closure disease. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2023;139(3):98‑105. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202313903198

Подписка 2026 Вестник офтальмологии (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
The role of iridotrabecular contact in the pathogenesis of primary angle closure disease. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(1):21-27
Primary angle closure suspects: application of machine learning method for substantiation of close moni­toring. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(2):67-74
Abstract:

The article reviews literature data on the search for predictors of the success of laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) and lensectomy in the early stages of primary angle closure disease (PACD) and presents a trend analysis of the studies conducted on individuals identified as primary angle closure suspects (PACs) and those with primary angle closure (PAC). The concept of the review was determined by the ambiguous choice of treatment for patients at the stage of PAC onset. Determining the success predictors of LPI or lensectomy plays a key role in optimizing the treatment of PACD. The results of literature analysis are contradictory, which indicates the need for further research taking into account modern methods of visualization of the eye structures such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), Swept Source OCT (SS-OCT), and the use of uniform criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment.

Keywords:

predictors of the success of laser peripheral iridotomy
predictors of the success of lensectomy
primary angle closure
primary angle closure suspect
SS-OCT

Authors:

Kurysheva N.I.

Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the State Research Center — Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency;
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of the Federal Medical Biological Agency;
Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Sharova G.A.

Eye Clinic of Doctor Belikova LLC

Received:

02.10.2022

Accepted:

10.03.2023

Close metadata

References:

  1. Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C, et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle‐closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10052):1389-1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30956-4
  2. Nonaka A, Kondo T, Kikuchi M, Yamashiro K, Fujihara M, Iwawaki T, Yamamoto K, Kurimoto Y. Cataract surgery for residual angle closure after peripheral laser iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(6):974-979.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.042
  3. Stock RA, Röhrig MW, Mezzomo CD, Bonamigo EL. Phacoemulsification: an alternative for prophylaxis of a glaucomatous crisis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1721-1726. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S223496
  4. Kwon J, Sung KR, Han S. Long-term Changes in Anterior Segment Characteristics of Eyes With Different Primary Angle-Closure Mechanisms. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;191:54-63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.04.005
  5. How AC, Baskaran M, Kumar RS, He M, Foster PJ, Lavanya R, Wong HT, Chew PT, Friedman DS, Aung T. Changes in anterior segment morphology after laser peripheral iridotomy: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(7):1383-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.019
  6. Tun TA, Sawicki A, Wilkos-Kuc A, Aung T, Zarnowski T. Circumferential Assessment of Changes in Anterior Segment Characteristics and Baseline Predictors of Angle Widening After Laser Iridotomy in Caucasian Eyes. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(9):839-845.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001866
  7. Koh V, Keshtkaran MR, Hernstadt D, Aquino MCD, Chew PT, Sng C. Predicting the outcome of laser peripheral iridotomy for primary angle closure suspect eyes using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(1):57-63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13822
  8. Moghimi S, Chen R, Johari M, Bijani F, Mohammadi M, Khodabandeh A, He MG, Lin SC. Changes in anterior segment morphology after laser peripheral iridotomy in acute primary angle closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 166:133-140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.03.032
  9. Chen X, Wang X, Tang Y, Sun X, Chen Y. Optical coherence tomography analysis of anterior segment parameters before and after laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects by using CASIA2. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):144.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02366-2
  10. Xu BY, Friedman DS, Foster PJ, Jiang Y, Pardeshi AA, Jiang Y, Munoz B, Aung T, He M. Anatomic Changes and Predictors of Angle Widening after Laser Peripheral Iridotomy: The Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Trial. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(8):1161-1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.021
  11. Zebardast N, Kavitha S, Krishnamurthy P, et al. Changes in Anterior Segment Morphology and Predictors of Angle Widening after Laser Iridotomy in South Indian Eyes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(12):2519-2526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.08.020
  12. Kansara S, Blieden LS, Chuang AZ, Baker LA, Bell NP, Mankiewicz KA, Feldman RM. Effect of Laser Peripheral Iridotomy on Anterior Chamber Angle Anatomy in Primary Angle Closure Spectrum Eyes. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(5):469-474.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000293
  13. Ang BC, Nongpiur ME, Aung T, Mizoguchi T, Ozaki M. Changes in Japanese eyes after laser peripheral iridotomy: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(3):159-165.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12673
  14. Huang G, Gonzalez E, Lee R, Osmonavic S, Leeungurasatien T, He M, Lin SC. Anatomic predictors for anterior chamber angle opening after laser peripheral iridotomy in narrow angle eyes. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37(7):575-582.  https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2012.655396
  15. Liu YM, Hu D, Zhou LF, et al. Associations of lens thickness and axial length with outcomes of laser peripheral iridotomy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(5): 714-718.  https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2021.05.11
  16. Lee RY, Kasuga T, Cui QN, et al. Association between baseline iris thickness and prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy outcomes in primary angle-closure suspects. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(6):1194-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.027
  17. Mansoori T, Balakrishna N. Anterior segment morphology after laser iridotomy in primary angle closure suspects. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101(3): 333-338.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12631
  18. Traverso CE, Cutolo CA. The Effects of Phacoemulsification and Intraocular Lens Implantation on Anatomical and Functional Parameters in Patients with Primary Angle Closure: A Prospective Study. (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2017;115:T7. Published 2017 Nov 9. 
  19. Melese E, Peterson JR, Feldman RM, et al. Comparing Laser Peripheral Iridotomy to Cataract Extraction in Narrow Angle Eyes Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162283
  20. Liu CJ, Cheng CY, Wu CW, Lau LI, Chou JC, Hsu WM. Factors predicting intraocular pressure control after phacoemulsification in angle-closure glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(10):1390-1394. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.124.10.1390
  21. Dada T, Rathi A, Angmo D, et al. Clinical outcomes of clear lens extraction in eyes with primary angle closure. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(7):1470-1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.029
  22. Shams PN, Foster PJ. Clinical outcomes after lens extraction for visually significant cataract in eyes with primary angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(8): 545-550.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821db1db1
  23. Amerasinghe N, Foster PJ, Wong TY, et al. Variation of angle parameters in asians: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study in a population of singapore malays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(6):2626-2631. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2582
  24. Narayanaswamy A, Sakata LM, He MG, et al. Diagnostic performance of anterior chamber angle measurements for detecting eyes with narrow angles: an anterior segment OCT study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(10):1321-1327. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.231
  25. Mitchell WG, Azuara-Blanco A, Foster PJ, et al. Predictors of long-term intraocular pressure control after lens extraction in primary angle closure glaucoma: results from the EAGLE trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;bjophthalmol-2021-319765. Epub ahead of print 2022 Apr 6.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319765
  26. Tarongoy P, Ho CL, Walton DS. Angle-closure glaucoma: the role of the lens in the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009; 54(2):211-225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.12.002
  27. Sihota R, Lakshmaiah NC, Walia KB, Sharma S, Pailoor J, Agarwal HC. The trabecular meshwork in acute and chronic angle closure glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2001;49(4):255-259. 
  28. Dias-Santos A, Ferreira J, Abegão Pinto L, et al. Phacoemulsification versus peripheral iridotomy in the management of chronic primary angle closure: long-term follow-up. Int Ophthalmol. 2015;35(2):173-178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-014-9926-8
  29. Mark HH. Gender differences in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(2):284.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.123.2.284-a
  30. Amerasinghe N, Aung T. Angle-closure: risk factors, diagnosis and treatment. Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:31-45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)01104-7
  31. Lee CS, Lee ML, Yanagihara RT, Lee AY. Predictors of narrow angle detection rate-a longitudinal study of Massachusetts residents over 1.7 million person years. Eye (Lond). 2021;35(3):952-958.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-1003-0
  32. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262-267.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.081224
  33. Altintaş O, Caglar Y, Yüksel N, Demirci A, Karabaş L. The effects of menopause and hormone replacement therapy on quality and quantity of tear, intraocular pressure and ocular blood flow. Ophthalmologica. 2004;218(2): 120-129.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000076148
  34. Toker E, Yenice O, Akpinar I, Aribal E, Kazokoglu H. The influence of sex hormones on ocular blood flow in women. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003; 81(6):617-624.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1395-3907.2003.00160.x
  35. Harris A, Harris M, Biller J, et al. Aging affects the retrobulbar circulation differently in women and men. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(8):1076-1080. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.8.1076
  36. Nongpiur ME, He M, Amerasinghe N, et al. Lens vault, thickness, and position in Chinese subjects with angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(3): 474-479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.025
  37. Moghimi S, Vahedian Z, Fakhraie G, et al. Ocular biometry in the subtypes of angle closure: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(4):664-673.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.10.014
  38. Tan GS, He M, Zhao W, Sakata LM, Li J, Nongpiur ME, Lavanya R, Friedman DS, Aung T. Determinants of lens vault and association with narrow angles in patients from Singapore. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(1):39-46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.01.015
  39. Foo LL, Nongpiur ME, Allen JC, et al. Determinants of angle width in Chinese Singaporeans. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(2):278-282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.049
  40. Tiedeman JS. A physical analysis of the factors that determine the contour of the iris. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111(3):338-343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72319-0
  41. Nonaka A, Iwawaki T, Kikuchi M, Fujihara M, Nishida A, Kurimoto Y. Quantitative evaluation of iris convexity in primary angle closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(4):695-697.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.11.018
  42. Nützi C, Orgül S, Schötzau A, Grieshaber MC. Predictability of morphological changes of the anterior chamber angle after laser iridotomy by ultrasound biomicroscopy. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2015;232(4):419-426.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1545793
  43. Konstas AG, Marshall GE, Lee WR. Immunocytochemical localisation of collagens (I-V) in the human iris. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990; 228(2):180-186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00935730
  44. He M, Lu Y, Liu X, Ye T, Foster PJ. Histologic changes of the iris in the development of angle closure in Chinese eyes. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(5):386-392.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c5f69
  45. Panda SK, Tan RKY, Tun TA, et al. Changes in Iris Stiffness and Permeability in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021; 62(13):29.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.13.29
  46. Kurysheva NI, Pomerantsev AL, Rodionova OYe, Sharova GA. Machine Learning Methods in the Comparative Evaluation of Various Approaches to the Surgical Treatment of Primary Angle Closure. Ophthalmology in Russia = Oftal’mologiya. 2022;19(3):549-556. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2022-3-549-556
  47. Kurysheva N.I., Pomerantsev A.L., Rodionova O.Ye., Sharova G.A. Comparison of Lens Extraction versus Laser Iridotomy on Anterior Segment, Choroid and Intraocular Pressure in Primary Angle Closure Using Machine Learning. J Glaucoma/ 2022 Nov 28. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002145
  48. Rodionova OYe, Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA, Pomerantsev AL. Expanding the DD-SIMCA concept: A case study of precision medicine. Analyt Chim Acta. 2023;1250:340958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.340958
  49. Kurysheva NI, Rodionova OYe, Pomerantsev AL, Sharova GA. Comparative study of predictors of hypotensive efficacy of laser peripheral iridotomy and lensectomy in patients with primary anterior chamber angle closure based on machine learning methods. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2023;85:104884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104884
  50. Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA. Anatomical and topographical characteristics of the eye in the early stages of primary angle closure disease. National Journal glaucoma. 2023;22(1):42-53. (In Russ.)/ https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-1-42-53
  51. Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA. Primary anterior chamber angle closure: progression from suspect to glaucoma. Part 1. Frequency and rate of transition from suspected primary angle closure to true angle closure and primary angle closure glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2022;138(4):101-107/(In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2022138041101
  52. Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA. Primary anterior chamber angle closure: progression from suspect to glaucoma. Part 2. Predictors of primary angle closure. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2022;138(4): 108-116/(In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2022138041108
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.