The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kurysheva N.I.

Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the State Scientific Center — Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center;
Ophthalmological Center of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia State Scientific Center — Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center

Sharova G.A.

Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the State Scientific Center — Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center;
OOO Glaznaya klinika doktora Belikovoy

Kalimullina L.R.

Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the State Scientific Center — Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center;
Ophthalmological Center of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia State Scientific Center — Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center

Investigation of iridotrabecular contact in primary angle closure

Authors:

Kurysheva N.I., Sharova G.A., Kalimullina L.R.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;140(6): 24‑31

Read: 935 times


To cite this article:

Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA, Kalimullina LR. Investigation of iridotrabecular contact in primary angle closure. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;140(6):24‑31. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414006124

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Friedman DS, Foster PJ, Aung T, He M. Angle closure and angle-closure glaucoma: what we are doing now and what we will be doing in the future. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 May-Jun;40(4):381-387.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02774.x
  2. Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA. Anatomical and topographical characteristics of the eye in the early stages of primary angle closure disease. National Journal Glaucoma. 2023;22(1):42-53 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-1-42-53
  3. Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA, Belikova EI. Studying the role of the choroid and lens in the development of primary anterior chamber angle closure. National Journal Glaucoma. 2022;21(1):3-13 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-1-3-13
  4. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb; 86(2):238-242.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.2.238
  5. Zhang X, Guo PY, Lin C, et al. Assessment of Iris Trabecular Contact in Eyes with Gonioscopic Angle-Closure. Ophthalmology. 2023;130(1):111-119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.08.017
  6. Li F, Yang Y, Sun X, et al. Digital Gonioscopy Based on Three-dimensional Anterior-Segment OCT: An International Multicenter Study. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(1):45-53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.018
  7. Cho HK, Ahn D, Kee C. Evaluation of circumferential angle closure using iridotrabecular contact index after laser iridotomy by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(3):e190-e196. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13190
  8. Kurysheva NI, Pomerantsev AL, Rodionova OY, Sharova GA. Comparison of Lens Extraction Versus Laser Iridotomy on Anterior Segment, Choroid, and Intraocular Pressure in Primary Angle Closure Using Machine Learning. J Glaucoma. 2023;32(6):e43-e55.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002145
  9. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(6):831-836.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060119035
  10. Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA. The Role of Optical Coherence Tomography in the Diagnosis of Angle Closed Diseases of the Anterior Chamber. Part 1: Visualization of the Anterior Segment of the Eye. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(2):208-215 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-2-208-215
  11. Triolo G, Barboni P, Savini G, et al. The Use of Anterior-Segment Optical-Coherence Tomography for the Assessment of the Iridocorneal Angle and Its Alterations: Update and Current Evidence. J Clin Med. 2021;10(2):231.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020231
  12. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Johnson GJ, Seah SK. Variations in ocular biometry in an adult Chinese population in Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(1):73-80. 
  13. Zhang Y, Cheng G, Chen Y, et al. Comparison of Long-Term Effects Following Phacoemulsification Combined with Goniosynechialysis and Trabeculectomy in Patients with Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma and Cataract. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024;13(1):423-434.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00823-9
  14. Zuo C, Long B, Guo X, Chen L, Liu X. Effect of Phacoemulsification on Anterior Chamber Angle in Eyes with Medically Uncontrolled Filtered Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:8720450. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8720450
  15. Yu J, Sun M, Wei Y, et al. The timing of goniosynechialysis in treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma combined with cataract. Mol Vis. 2012;18: 1074-1082.
  16. Sihota R, Goyal A, Kaur J, Gupta V, Nag TC. Scanning electron microscopy of the trabecular meshwork: understanding the pathogenesis of primary angle closure glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60(3):183-188.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.95868
  17. Husain R, Do T, Lai J, et al. Efficacy of Phacoemulsification Alone vs Phacoemulsification With Goniosynechialysis in Patients With Primary Angle-Closure Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019; 137(10):1107-1113. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2493
  18. Tian T, Li M, Pan Y, Cai Y, Fang Y. The effect of phacoemulsification plus goniosynechialysis in acute and chronic angle closure patients with extensive goniosynechiae. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):65.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1070-9
  19. Shao T, Hong J, Xu J, Le Q, Wang J, Qian S. Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment by Anterior-segment Optical Coherence Tomography After Phacoemulsification With or Without Goniosynechialysis in Patients With Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(9):647-655.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000061
  20. Luo S, Yuan G, Zhao C, et al. Changes in Anterior Chamber Angle and Choroidal Thickness in Patients with Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma after Phaco-Goniosynechialysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(2):406.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020406
  21. Angmo D, Shakrawal J, Gupta B, Yadav S, Pandey RM, Dada T. Comparative Evaluation of Phacoemulsification Alone versus Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019;2(5):346-356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2019.05.004
  22. Wang N, Ouyang J, Zhou W, Lai M, Ye T, Zeng M, Chen J. [Multiple patterns of angle closure mechanisms in primary angle closure glaucoma in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2000; 36(1):46-6 (In Chinese).
  23. Zheng Q, Hu M, Li ZL, Chang PJ, Zhao YE. Assessment of anterior chamber angle changes after phacoemulsification with swept-source OCT. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(10):1527-1532. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2021.10.08
  24. Tun TA, Nongpiur ME, Xu BY, et al. Investigating the determinants of iridolenticular contact area: a novel parameter for angle closure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 20;108(7):940-945.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2022-322810
  25. Song WK, Sung KR, Kim KE. Assessment of Iridotrabecular Contact and Its Association With Intraocular Pressure After Phacoemulsification in Primary Angle Closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023;249:1-11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.12.023
  26. Gupta B, Angmo D, Yadav S, Dada T, Gupta V, Sihota R. Quantification of Iridotrabecular Contact in Primary Angle-Closure Disease. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(8):681-688.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001572
  27. Baskaran M, Yang E, Trikha S, et al. Residual Angle Closure One Year After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;183:111-117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.016
  28. He M, Friedman DS, Ge J, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects: biometric and gonioscopic outcomes: the Liwan Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(3):494-500.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.053
  29. Yan C, Han Y, Yu Y, et al. Effects of lens extraction versus laser peripheral iridotomy on anterior segment morphology in primary angle closure suspect. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(7):1473-1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04353-8
  30. Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA. Comparative study of retinal microcirculation in primary angle closure disease and early primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology=Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2022;138(1):44-51 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202213801144
  31. Mansoori T. Imaging iridotrabecular contact in angle closure. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71(5):2323-2324. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_74_23
  32. Kurysheva NI, Rodionova OYe., Pomerantsev AL., Sharova GA. Comparative study of predictors of hypotensive efficacy of laser peripheral iridotomy and lensectomy in patients with primary anterior chamber angle closure based on machine learning methods. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2023;85:104884. ISSN 1746-8094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104884

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.