The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Trufanov S.V.

Uchrezhdenie Rossiĭskoĭ akademii meditsinskikh nauk "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ RAMN", Moskva

Salovarova E.P.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11 A, B, Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

Sukhanova E.V.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

Sukhanov T.R.

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Physics, 1-2 Leninskie Gory St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991

Refractive changes after different modifications of endothelial keratoplasty

Authors:

Trufanov S.V., Salovarova E.P., Sukhanova E.V., Sukhanov T.R.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(5‑2): 184‑191

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2019135052184

Read: 117 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

REFRACTIVE CHANGES AFTER DIFFERENT MODIFICATIONS OF ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY
REFRACTIVE CHANGES AFTER DIFFERENT MODIFICATIONS OF ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY

To cite this article:

Trufanov SV, Salovarova EP, Sukhanova EV, Sukhanov TR. Refractive changes after different modifications of endothelial keratoplasty. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(5‑2):184‑191. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2019135052184

Подписка 2026 Вестник офтальмологии (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Biomechanical control of myopia: pote­ntial of bidi­rectional corneal applanation with high-speed video reco­rding. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):25-32
Spontaneous vertebral artery dissection complicated by a transient ischemic attack in a migraine patient. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(3-2):53-56
Abstract:

Purpose — to evaluate changes in clinical refraction after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK), and assess their correlation to the thickness of the transplant. Material and methods. The main study group included 40 patients (40 eyes) after DSAEK and 20 patients (20 eyes) after DMEK, the control group consisted of 20 patients (20 eyes) without any corneal pathologies or history of surgical treatment. In addition to standard examination, patients of the main group had central corneal thickness and transplant thickness regularly measured; they were also monitored by optical coherence tomography (Optovue, U.S.A.), computed tomography and aberrometry of the cornea performed on Pentacam device. The control group had the same examination regimen. Results. Best corrected visual acuity after 6 months was on average 0.2 higher in DMEK patients compared to those who underwent DSAEK; after one year — 0.1 higher. Clinical refraction data shows presence of hypermetropic changes after DSAEK surgery. Induced astigmatism after one year was 0.4 Diopters in DSAEK patients, but did not exceed 0.1 Diopters in DMEK patients. Stabilization of the corneal thickness in DMEK group occurred on the 3—4th month, in DSAEK group — 6—7th month. Certain values of higher-order aberrations (3—6) and root-mean-square deviation (RMS) of the wave-front of anterior corneal surface in DSAEK and DMEK groups were higher than in the control group. Aberrations on the posterior corneal surface in DMEK group were significantly lower than in DSAEK group. There were no statistically significant differences in «final» RMS higher-order aberrations between DMEK and DSAEK groups.

Keywords:

cornea
bullous keratoplasty
DSAEK
DMEK
dissection
transplant
higher-order aberration

Authors:

Trufanov S.V.

Uchrezhdenie Rossiĭskoĭ akademii meditsinskikh nauk "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ RAMN", Moskva

Salovarova E.P.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11 A, B, Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

Sukhanova E.V.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

Sukhanov T.R.

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Physics, 1-2 Leninskie Gory St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991

Close metadata

References:

  1. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, McAllum P. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1525-1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.02.010
  2. Koenig SB, Covert DJ. Early results of small-incision Descemet’s stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(2):221-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.056
  3. Pogorelov P, Cursiefen C, Bachmann BO, Kruse FE. Changes in donor corneal lenticule thickness after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with organ-cultured corneas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(6):825-829. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.147389
  4. Ple-Plakon PA, Shtein RM. Trends in corneal transplantation: indications and techniques. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25(4):300-305. https://doi.org/10.1097/icu.0000000000000080
  5. Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(6):1082-1090.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.12.012
  6. Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW Jr. Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(3):536-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.019
  7. Van Dijk K, Ham L, Tse WH, Liarakos V, Quilendrino R, Yeh R, Melles RJ. Near complete visual recovery and refractive stability in modern corneal transplantation: Descemetmembrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36(1):13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2012.10.066
  8. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Levinger E, Sansanayudh W, Slomovic AR, Rootman DS. Retrospective contralateral study comparing descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2009;28(5):485-488. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e3181901df4
  9. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Livny E, Slomovic A, Slomovic A. Changes in corneal curvatures and anterior segment parameters after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Eye Res. 2010;35(11):961-966. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2010.506967
  10. Rudolph M, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Epstein D, Kruse FE. Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(3):528-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.034
  11. Scorcia V, Matteoni S, Scorcia GB, Scorcia G, Busin M. Pentacam assessment of posterior lamellar grafts to explain hyperopization after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(9):1651-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.035
  12. Lombardo M, Terry MA, Lombardo G, Boozer DD, Serrao S, Ducoli P. Analysis of posterior donor corneal parameters 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) triple procedure. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248(3):421-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1284-2
  13. Busin M, Bhatt PR, Scorcia V. A modified technique for descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(8):1133-1137. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.8.1133
  14. Khor WB, Mehta JS, Tan DT. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with a graft insertion device: surgical technique and early clinical results. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(2):223-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.08.027
  15. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Giebel AW, Price FW. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(12):2368-2373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.002
  16. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(11):1936-1942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.034
  17. Koenig SB, Covert DJ, Dupps WJ Jr, Meisler DM. Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea. 2007;26(6):670-674. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e3180544902
  18. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Phillips PM, Hoar KL, Friend DJ. Precut tissue for Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(2):248-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.017
  19. Ham L, Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Balachandran C, Frank LE, van Dijk K, Melles GRJ. Refractive change and stability after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Effect of corneal dehydration-induced hyperopic shift on intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(8):1455-1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.02.033
  20. Bonfadini G, Ladas JG, Moreira H, Campos M, Matthaei M, Muñoz B, Pratzer K, Jun AS. Optimization of intraocular lens constant improves refractive outcomes in combined endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(2):234-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.003
  21. Esquenazi S, Rand W. Effect of the shape of the endothelial graft on the refractive results after Descemet’s stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty. Can J Ophthalmol. 2009;44(5):557-561. https://doi.org/10.3129/i09-087
  22. Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, Deobhakta AA, Ide T, Manns F, Culbertson WW, O’Brien TP, Alfonso EC. One-year results and anterior segment optical coherence tomography findings of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty combined with Phacoemulsification. Arch Opthalmol. 2008;126(8):1052-1055. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.8.1052
  23. Rose L, Briceno CA, Stark WJ, Gloria DG, Jun AS. Assessment of eye bank-prepared posterior lamellar corneal tissue for endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(2):279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.020
  24. Holz HA, Meyer JJ, Espandar L, Tabin GC, Mifflin MD, Moshirfar M. Corneal profile analysis after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and its relationship to postoperative hyperopic shift. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(2):211-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.030
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.