The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 101-59-87
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2024
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Yulova A.G.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11 A,B Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

Zelyanina E.V.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11 A, B Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

Intravitreal injection as a possible model for studying biomechanics of fibrous tunic

Authors:

Yulova A.G., Zelyanina E.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2016;132(2): 85‑89

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2016132285-89

Views: 360

Downloaded: 17

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Yulova AG, Zelyanina EV. Intravitreal injection as a possible model for studying biomechanics of fibrous tunic. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2016;132(2):85‑89. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2016132285-89

Подписка 2025 (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Stru­ctural and functional features of the eye in Marfan syndrome. Report 1. Changes in the fibrous tunic of the eye. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(1):5-10
Changes in intraocular pressure and biometric para­meters of the ante­rior segment of the eye after intravitreal inje­ctions. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(2-2):7-15
Topi­cal application of hypo­tensive drugs for the prevention of intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal inje­ctions of anti-VEGF drugs. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(2-2):73-79
The rela­tionship between intraocular pressure and age-related variations in ocular rigi­dity. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(3):11-18
Study of the growth temperature of ocular surface microorganisms in norm and in infe­ctious kera­titis. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(3):34-42
Comparative asse­ssment of the state of the cornea after YAG-laser inte­rventions on ante­rior segment stru­ctures. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(4):17-25
Options for contact correction after kera­toplasty. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(4):98-103
Biomechanical control of myopia: pote­ntial of bidi­rectional corneal applanation with high-speed video reco­rding. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):25-32

The article summarizes the results of Russian and foreign research concerning biomechanical principles of eye functioning as an integral physiological system. Quite a number of studies have been published on corneal and scleral mechanics, which is also part of the said system. These studies fall largely into three groups: in vivo studies (involving living organism), in vitro studies (within an artificial environment), and mathematical modeling. In vivo techniques are often rather complicated and, therefore, most studies are based on in vitro procedures. Due to the growing number of intravitreal injections, they can be regarded as a stress test for studying fibrous tunic biomechanics in vivo. The results of such studies would contribute to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of various eye diseases and thus, a better clinical practice.

Keywords:

ocular biomechanics
cornea
sclera
intravitreal injection

Authors:

Yulova A.G.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11 A,B Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

Zelyanina E.V.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11 A, B Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

List of references:

  1. Avetisov S, Bubnova I, Antonov A. Clinical and experimental aspects of investigation of biomechanical properties of corneoscleral shell. Vestnik oftal'mologii. 2013;5:83-91. (In Russ.)
  2. Avetisov S. Potentials and prospects of studying of cornea mechanical features. Rossijskie medicinskie vesti. 2011;15(1):94-96.
  3. Iomdina E, Bauer S, Kotlyar K. Biomekhanika glaza:Teoreticheskie aspekty i klinicheskie prilozheniya. M.: Real Taim; 2015:5. (In Russ.)
  4. Maklakov A. Oftal'motonometriya. Меdicinskоe obozrenie. 1884;24:1092-1095. (In Russ.)
  5. Ljubimova D. Biomechanics of the Human Eye and Intraocular Pressure Measurements. Sweden; 2009:56-60.
  6. Avetisov S, Mamikonyan V, Zavalishin N, Nenyukov A. Experimental study of mechanical properties of the cornea and sclera adjacent areas. Oftal'mologicheskii zhurnal. 1988;4:233-237. (In Russ.)
  7. Bryant MR, McDonnell PJ. Constitutive laws for biomechanical modeling of refractive surgery. Journal of biomechanical engineering. 1996;118(4):473-481.  doi:10.1115/1.2796033.
  8. Cabrera Fernandez D, Niazy AM, Kurtz RM et al. Finite element analysis applied to cornea reshaping. Journal of biomedical optics. 2005;10(6):064018. doi:10.1117/1.2136149.
  9. Hoeltzel DA, Altman P, Buzard K et al. Strip extensiometry for comparison of the mechanical response of bovine, rabbit, and human corneas. Journal of biomechanical engineering. 1992;114(2):202-215.  doi:10.1115/1.2891373.
  10. Stitzel JD, Duma SM, Cormier JM et al. A nonlinear finite element model of the eye with experimental validation for the prediction of globe rupture. Stapp car crash journal. 2002;46:81-102.
  11. Studer H, Larrea X, Riedwyl H et al. Biomechanical model of human cornea based on stromal microstructure. Journal of biomechanics. 2010;43(5):836-842.  doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.021.
  12. Tokoro T, Funata M, Akazawa Y. Influence of intraocular pressure on axial elongation. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 1990;6(4):285-291.  doi:10.1089/jop.1990.6.285.
  13. Phillips JR, McBrien NA. Pressure-induced changes in axial eye length of chick and tree shrew: significance of myofibroblasts in the sclera. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2004;45(3):758-763.  doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0732.
  14. Svetlova O, Koshits I. Vzaimodeistvie osnovnykh putei ottoka vnutriglaznoi zhidkosti s mekhanizmom akkomodatsii. SPb.; 2002:30. (In Russ.)
  15. Koshits I, Svetlova O, Kotlyar K. Biomechanical analysis of traditional and contemporary conceptions on pathogenesis of the primary open-angle glaucoma. Glaukoma. 2005;1:41-62. (In Russ.)
  16. Svetlova O, Koshits I. Fiziologicheskie funktsii fibroznoi obolochki i ikh ispolnitel'nye mekhanizmy. SPb.; 2013:20-21. (In Russ.)
  17. Friedman E, Ivry M, Ebert E, Glynn R, Gragoudas E, Seddon J. Increased scleral rigidity and age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(1):104-108.  doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32936-8.
  18. Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Ginis HS, Kounis GA, Christodoulakis E, Tsilimbaris MK. Ocular rigidity in patients with age-related macular degeneration. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2006;141(4):611-615.  doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.11.010.
  19. Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Ginis HS, Kounis GA, Tsilimbaris MK. Ocular rigidity in living human eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2005;46(2):409-414.  doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0162.
  20. Tano Y, Chandler D, Machemer R. Treatment of intraocular proliferation with intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1980;90(6):810-816.  doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75196-7.
  21. Robert L Avery, Sophie J Bakri, Mark S Blumenkranz, Alexander J Brucker, Emmett T Cunningham, Donald J DʼAmico et al. Intravitreal injection technique and monitoring: updated guidelines of an expert panel. Retina. 2014;34:1-18.  doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000399.
  22. Henry F Edelhauser, Cheryl L Rowe-Rendleman, Michael R Robinson, Daniel G Dawson, Gerald J Chader, Hans E Grossniklaus, Kay D Rittenhouse et al. Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Systems for the Treatment of Retinal Diseases: Basic Research to Clinical Applications. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2010;51:5403-5420. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5392.
  23. Pershin B, Kozlova I, Ermolaev A. Experimental evaluation of correlation between intraocular pressure fluctuation and hemodynamic indices of the eye after intravitreous injection. Glaukoma. 2012;1:16-20. (In Russ.)
  24. Starkov G. Patologiya steklovidnogo tela. M.: Meditsina; 1967. (In Russ.)
  25. Richard F. Brubaker. Targeting Outflow Facility in Glaucoma Management. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2003;48:17-20.  doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(03)00003-1.
  26. Kotliar K, Maier M, Bauer S et al. Effect of intravitreal injections and volume changes on intraocular pressure:clinical results and biomechanical model. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 2007;85:777-781.  doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00939.x.
  27. Gismondi M, Salati C, Salvetat ML et al. Short-term effect of intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab (Lucentis) on intraocular pressure. Journal of Glaucoma. 2009;18:658-661.  doi:10.1097/ijg.0b013e31819c4893.
  28. Chikun E, Karpilova M, Kuznetsov A, Andreeva I, Gabina G, Plyukhova A, Budzinskaya M, Erichev V, Avetisov S. Role of biomechanical properties of fibrous coat of the eye in intraocular pressure changes in patients after intravitreal ranibizumab injections. Pilot study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2013.
  29. Arutyunyan L, Erichev V, Filippova O, Akopyan A. Viscoelastic properties of the cornea in primary open-angle glaucoma. Glaukoma. 2007;2:14-18. (In Russ.)
  30. Iomdina E, Arutyunyan L, Katargina L, Kiseleva O, Filippova O. Interrelation between corneal hysteresis and structural functional parameters of the optic nerve in different stages of primary open angle glaucoma. Rossiiskii oftal'mologicheskii zhurnal. 2009;2(3):17-23. (In Russ.)
  31. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. Journal of Glaucoma. 2006;15(5):364-370.  doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000212268.42606.97.
  32. Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, Wong T, Chan KC, Sachdev N. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2008;49(8):3262-3268. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1556.
  33. Erichev V, Eremina M, Yakubova L, Aref'eva Yu. Ocular Response Analyzer in valuation of cornea’s viscoelastic properties in normal eyes. Glaukoma. 2007;6(1):11-15. (In Russ.)
  34. Arutyunyan L. Ocular biomechanical properties to set appropriate intraocular pressure target. Glaukoma. 2007;6(3):60-67. (In Russ.)
  35. Iomdina E, Ignatieva N, Danilov N, Arutunyan L, Kiseleva O, Nazarenko L. Biochemical, structural and biomechanical features of human scleral matrix in primary open-angle glaucoma. Vestnik oftal'mologii. 2011;6:10-14. (In Russ.)
  36. Neroev V, Khandzhanyan A, Zaitseva O. New potentialities in measurement of corneal biomechanical properties and IOP. Glaukoma. 2006;1:51-58. (In Russ.)
  37. Tseng JJ, Vance SK, Della Torre KE, Mendonca LS, Cooney MJ, Klancnik JM, Sorenson JA, Freund KB. Sustained increased intraocular pressure related to intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Journal of Glaucoma. 2012;21(4):241-247.  doi:10.1097/ijg.0b013e31820d7d19.
  38. Aref A. Management of immediate and sustained intraocular pressure rise associated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injection therapy. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2012;23(2):105-110.  doi:10.1097/icu.0b013e32834ff41d.
  39. Sniegowski M, Mandava N, Kahook MY. Sustained intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and ranibizumab associated with trabeculitis. The Open Ophthalmology Journal. 2010;4:28-29.  doi:10.2174/1874364101004010028.
  40. Alkin Z, Perente I, Altan C, Konstantinidis A, Ozkaya A, Yuksel K et al. Changes in anterior segment morphology after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and bevacizu-mab-triamcinolone acetate combination. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013;23:504-509.  doi:10.5301/ejo.5000241.
  41. Güler M, Capkın M, Simşek A, Bilak S, Bilgin B, Hakim Reyhan A, Fırat M. Short-term effects of intravitreal bevacizumab on cornea and anterior chamber. Current Eye Research. 2014;39(10):989-993.  doi:10.3109/02713683.2014.888452.
  42. Volkov V. Glaukoma pri psevdonormal'nom davlenii. M.: Meditsina; 2001:350. (In Russ.)
  43. Nesterov A. Glаukoma. M.: Meditsina; 1995:255. (In Russ.)
  44. Radius R, Gonzales M. Anatomy of the lamina cribrosa in human eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1981;99(12):2163-2165. doi:10.1001/archopht.1981.03930021035010.
  45. Bauer S, Voronkova Е. On the deformation of the Lamina Cribrosa under intraocular pressure. Rossiiskii zhurnal biomekhaniki. 2001;5(1):73-82. (In Russ.)
  46. Roberts MD, Liang Y, Sigal IA, Grimm J, Reynaud J, Bellezza A, Burgoyne CF, Downs JC. Correlation between local stress and strain and lamina cribrosa connective tissue volume fraction in normal monkey eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2010;51(1):295-307.  doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4016.
  47. Bellezza AJ, Rintalan CJ, Thompson HW et al. Deformation of the lamina cribrosa and anterior scleral canal wall in early experimental glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2003;44:623-637.  doi:10.1167/iovs.01-1282.
  48. Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza AJ et al. The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure:a new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP-related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damage. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2005;24:39-73.  doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.06.001.
  49. Levy NS, Crapps EE. Displacement of optic nerve head in response to short-term intraocular pressure elevation in human eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1984;102:782-786.  doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.06.001.
  50. Morgan WH, Chauhan BC, Yu DY et al. Optic disc movement with variations in intraocular and cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2002;43:3236-3242.
  51. Sigal IA, Ethier CR. Biomechanics of the optic nerve head. Experimental Eye Research 2009;88:799-807. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2009.02.003. Yan DB, Coloma FM, Metheetrairut A et al. Deformation of the lamina cribrosa by elevated intraocular pressure. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1994;78:643-648.  doi:10.1136/bjo.78.8.643.
  52. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR. Modeling individual specific human optic nerve head biomechanics. Part I:IOP-induced deformations and influence of geometry. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2009;8:85-98.  doi:10.1007/s10237-008-0120-7.
  53. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR. Modeling individual-specific human optic nerve head biomechanics. Part II:influence of material properties. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2009;8:99-109.  doi:10.1007/s10237-008-0119-0.
  54. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Ethier CR. Factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 2005;46:4189-199.  doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0541.
  55. Jonas JB, Berenshtein E, Holbach L. Lamina cribrosa thickness and spatial relationships between intraocular space and cerebrospinal fluid space in highly myopic eyes. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2004;45(8):2660-2665. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-1363.
  56. Tomita G. The optic nerve head in normal-tension glaucoma . Glaucoma Update VI. 2000;11(2):116-120.  doi:10.1007/978-3-642-57056-8_24.
  57. Tomoyose E, Higa A, Sakai H et al. Intraocular pressure and related systemic and ocular biometric factors in a population-based study in Japan:the Kumejima study. American journal of ophthalmology. 2010;150(2):279-286.  doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.03.009.
  58. Yablonski ME, Asamoto A. Hypothesis concerning the pathophysiology of optic nerve damage in open angle glaucoma. Journal of glaucoma. 1993;2(2):119-127.  doi:10.1097/00061198-199300220-00010.
  59. Choma M et al. Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Optics Express. 2003;11:2183-2189. doi:10.1364/oe.11.002183.
  60. Girard MJ et al. Shadow removal and contrast enhancement in optical coherence tomography images of the human optic nerve head. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52:738-748.  doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6925.
  61. He L et al. Longitudinal detection of optic nerve head changes by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in early experimental glaucoma. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2013;55:574-586.  doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13245.
  62. Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008;146(4):496-500.  doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.032.
  63. Manjunath V, Taha M, Fujimoto JG, Duker JS. Choroidal thickness in normal eyes measured using Cirrus HD optical coherence tomograph. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;150(3):325-329.  doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.018.
  64. Agoumi Y et al. Laminar and prelaminar tissue displacement during intraocular pressure elevation in glaucoma patients and healthy controls. Yearbook of Ophthalmology. 2011;118:52-59.  doi:10.1016/j.yoph.2011.08.005.
  65. Zhao Q, Qian X, Li L, Sun W, Huang S, Liu Z. Effect of elevated intraocular pressure on the thickness changes of cat laminar and prelaminar tissue using optical coherence tomography. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):2349-2360. doi:10.3233/BME-141048.
  66. Strouthidis NG et al. Effect of acute intraocular pressure elevation on the monkey optic nerve head as detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2011b;52:9431-9437. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7922.
  67. Sigal IA et al. IOP-induced lamina cribrosa displacement and scleral canal expansion: An analysis of factor interactions using parameterized eye-specific models. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52:1896-1907. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5500.
  68. Strouthidis NG. Longitudinal change detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the optic nerve head and peripapillary retina in experimental glaucoma. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52:1206-1219. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5599.

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register


We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.