Long-term results of scarring after breast surgery

Faizullin T.R.; Aleksanyan T.A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202502170

Faizullin T.R.

Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency”

ORCID: 0000-0002-3972-7448

Aleksanyan T.A.

ORCID: 0000-0002-9164-6282

Long-term results of scarring after breast surgery

Authors:

Faizullin T.R., Aleksanyan T.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(2): 70‑75

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202502170

Read: 1752 times

To cite this article:

Faizullin TR, Aleksanyan TA. Long-term results of scarring after breast surgery. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(2):70‑75. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202502170

Подписка 2026 Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина (Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the quality of postoperative scarring after combined breast surgery in patients with different types of breast tissue.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the quality of postoperative scars in 45 female patients after combined breast surgery considering breast tissue density. Postoperative follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

Breast tissue type is essential for postoperative scarring after combined breast surgery.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of breast tissue type before surgery is advisable for predicting postoperative scarring. This approach can influence the choice of surgical methods and quality of postoperative scars.

Keywords:

breast augmentation

mastopexy

postoperative scar

Authors:

Faizullin T.R.

ORCID: 0000-0002-3972-7448

Aleksanyan T.A.

ORCID: 0000-0002-9164-6282

Received:

10.01.2025

Accepted:

30.01.2025

Close metadata

References:

Terkulov AA, Devlikanova EE, Kolesnikov VE. Mammoplasty: from reconstructive to aesthetic surgery.Vestnik Avicenny`. 2022;24(4):20-22. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25005/2074-0581-2022-24-4-514-522
Kozhevnikova MA. Features of mammoplasty in patients with connective tissue dysplasia. Medicina. Psihologiya. 2021;(1):35-36. (In Russ.).
Guller AE, Shechter AB. Clinical type and histological structure of cutaneous scars as predictive factors of therapeutic outcome. Annaly plasticheskoj, rekonstruktivnoj i esteticheskoj hirurgii. 2017;(4):19-31. (In Russ.).
Vladimirova OV, Lavreshin PM, Minaev SV, Vladimirov VI. The experience of using an anti-scar combined agent with boswellic and hyaluronic acids and cepalin in patients with scars in the early stages of their development. Ambulatornaya xirurgiya. 2019;(1-2):140-145. (In Russ.).
Monavarian M, Kader S, Moeinzadeh S, Jabbari E. Regenerative scar- free skin wound healing. Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews. 2019;25(4):294-311. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2018.0350
Karel E, Sobczak E, Rapisarda F, Cook L. Periareolar (Benelli) Mammoplasty — Single Centre 5-Year Experience. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2022;48(2):E71.
Munhoz AM, de Azevedo Marques Neto A, Maximiliano J. Reoperative Augmentation Mammoplasty: An Algorithm to Optimize Soft-Tissue Support, Pocket Control, and Smooth Implant Stability with Composite Reverse Inferior Muscle Sling (CRIMS) and Its Technical Variations. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2022;46(3):1116-1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02726-1
Quirós MC, Bolaños MC, Fassero JJ. Six Year Prospective Outcomes of Primary Breast Augmentation with Nano Surface Implants. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2019;39(5):495-508. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy196
Mu D, Lin YA. Simple Preoperative Marking of Implant Augmentation Mammoplasty: The Semicircle Method. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2022; 46(4):1662-1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02846-2