The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kruglik S.V.

Network of plastic surgery and cosmetology clinics VIP Clinic, Moscow

Kononets O.A.

Clinic of plastic surgery “Medlaz”

Przhedetskiy Yu.V.

Rostov State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Malygin S.E.

Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology

Ismagilov A.Kh.

Kazan State Medical Academy, Branch of the Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of Russia;
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Marinicheva I.G.

Clinic of plastic surgery “Medlaz”;
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Gubaidulin Kh.M.

Sigal Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan

Melnikov D.V.

Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Alekseeva E.I.

State Order of the Red Banner of Labor Research Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Organoelement Compounds

Safety of silicone breast implants: a panel discussion

Authors:

Kruglik S.V., Kononets O.A., Przhedetskiy Yu.V., Malygin S.E., Ismagilov A.Kh., Marinicheva I.G., Gubaidulin Kh.M., Melnikov D.V., Alekseeva E.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(3): 118‑124

Read: 432 times


To cite this article:

Kruglik SV, Kononets OA, Przhedetskiy YuV, et al. . Safety of silicone breast implants: a panel discussion. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(3):118‑124. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia2025031118

Recommended articles:
Long-term resu­lts of scarring after breast surgery. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2025;(2):70-75
Comparative analysis of microtextured breast implant shells. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2025;(2-2):13-15

References:

  1. Leading surgical cosmetic procedures globally 2020 [Electronic resource]. Statista. Accessed September 08, 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/293437/leading-surgical-cosmetic-procedures
  2. Jalalabadi F, Doval AF, Neese V, Andrews E, Spiegel AJ. Breast Implant Utilization Trends in USA versus Europe and the Impact of BIA-ALCL Publications. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Mar 19;9(3):e3449. PMID: 33968547; PMCID: PMC8099399. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003449
  3. ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures [Electronic resource]. International Society of Plastic Surgery. 2020. Accessed September 08, 2022. https://www.isaps.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ISAPS-Global-Survey_2020.pdf
  4. The Top Eight Reasons Women Get Breast Augmentation [Electronic resource]. Accessed September 08, 2022. https://nanamd.com/blog/the-top-eight-reasons-women-get-breast-augmentation
  5. Coombs DM, Grover R, Prassinos A, Gurunluoglu R. Breast augmentation surgery: Clinical considerations. Cleve Clin J Med. 2019 Feb;86(2):111-122. PMID: 30742581. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.86a.18017
  6. Bodin F, Jung C, Dieval F, Chakfe N, Wisniewski S, Bruant Rodier C, Heim F. Aging of retrieved gel breast implants: a comparison between two product generations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 June;46:11-22. Epub 2015 Feb 19. PMID: 25746931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.008
  7. Magill LJ, Tanska A, Keshtgar M, Mosahebi A, Jell G. Mechanical and surface chemical analysis of retrieved breast implants from a single centre. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Mar;91:24-31. Epub 2018 Nov 02. PMID: 30529983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.042
  8. Adams WP Jr, Robinson JB Jr, Rohrich RJ. Lipid infiltration as a possible biologic cause of silicone gel breast implant aging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Jan;101(1):64-68; discussion 69-71. PMID: 9427917. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199801000-00011
  9. Birkefeld AB, Eckert H, Pfleiderer B. A study of the aging of silicone breast implants using 29Si, 1H relaxation and DSC measurements. Biomaterials. 2004 Aug;25(18):4405-4413. PMID: 15046931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.093
  10. Birkefeld AB, Bertermann R, Eckert H, Pfleiderer B. Liquid- and solid-state high-resolution NMR methods for the investigation of aging processes of silicone breast implants. Biomaterials. 2003 Jan;24(1):35-46. PMID: 12417176. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00241-7
  11. Beekman WH, Feitz R, Hage JJ, Mulder JW. Life span of silicone gel-filled mammary prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Dec;100(7):1723-1726; discussion 1727-1728. PMID: 9393469. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199712000-00012
  12. Brinton LA, Brown SL. Breast implants and cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Sept 17;89(18):1341-1349. PMID: 9308703. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/89.18.1341
  13. Mempin M, Hu H, Chowdhury D, Deva A, Vickery K. The A, B and C’s of Silicone Breast Implants: Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Biofilm and Capsular Contracture. Materials (Basel). 2018 Nov 28;11(12):2393. PMID: 30486500; PMCID: PMC6316940. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122393
  14. Perry D, Frame JD. The history and development of breast implants. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Sept;102(7):478-482. Epub 2020 Jan 22. PMID: 31964154; PMCID: PMC7450417. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2020.0003
  15. Marra A, Viale G, Pileri SA, et al. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: A comprehensive review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;84:101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.101963
  16. Atlan M, Nuti G, Wang H, Decker S, Perry T. Breast implant surface texture impacts host tissue response. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Dec; 88:377-385. Epub 2018 Aug 28. PMID: 30205325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.035
  17. Breast implants: Saline vs. silicone [Electronic resource]. Mayo Clinic. Accessed September 09, 2022. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/womens-health/in-depth/breast-implants/art-20045957
  18. Breast Implant Rupture [Electronic resource]. Accessed September 09, 2022. https://www.breastcancer.org/treatment/surgery/breast-reconstruction/corrective-reconstruction/implant-rupture
  19. Hillard C, Fowler JD, Barta R, Cunningham B. Silicone breast implant rupture: a review. Gland Surg. 2017 Apr;6(2):163-168. PMID: 28497020; PMCID: PMC5409893. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2016.09.12
  20. Lee Y, Song SE, Yoon ES, Bae JW, Jung SP. Extensive silicone lymphadenopathy after breast implant insertion mimicking malignant lymphadenopathy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017 Dec;93(6):331-335. Epub 2017 Dec 01. PMID: 29250513; PMCID: PMC5729128. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.93.6.331
  21. Van Slyke AC, Carr M, Carr NJ. Not All Breast Implants Are Equal: A 13-Year Review of Implant Longevity and Reasons for Explantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sept;142(3):281e-289e. PMID: 29879005. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004678
  22. Tanna N, Calobrace MB, Clemens MW, Hammond DC, Nahabedian MY, Rohrich RJ, Zhang BH, Bregman D, Perry AD. Not All Breast Explants Are Equal: Contemporary Strategies in Breast Explantation Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Apr 1;147(4):808-818. PMID: 33776030. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007784
  23. Kononets OA, Alekseeva EI, Vissarionov VA. The change of the main properties of silicone implants used as breast endoprostheses. Annaly plasticheskoj, rekonstruktivnoj i esteticheskoj khirurgii. 2010;4:37-45. (In Russ.).
  24. Kononets O, Alexeeva E. Investigation of aging processes of silicon implants. ISAPS XXIII Congress Kyoto. October 2016:75. 

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.