The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Semenov S.S.

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Vasilev Yu.A.

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department;
Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Vladzymyrskiy A.V.

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Omelyanskaya O.V.

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Kozhikhina D.D.

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Arzamasov K.M.

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Shulkin I.M.

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Rumyantsev D.A.

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department;
Central State Medical Academy

Muduev M.Yu.

Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department

Compliance with short-team follow-up in BI-RADS 3 patients

Authors:

Semenov S.S., Vasilev Yu.A., Vladzymyrskiy A.V., Omelyanskaya O.V., Kozhikhina D.D., Arzamasov K.M., Shulkin I.M., Rumyantsev D.A., Muduev M.Yu.

More about the authors

Read: 1094 times


To cite this article:

Semenov SS, Vasilev YuA, Vladzymyrskiy AV, et al. . Compliance with short-team follow-up in BI-RADS 3 patients. Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2025;47(1):92‑99. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/medtech20254701192

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 5th Edition. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA; 2013.
  2. Berg WA. BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management? Journal of Breast Imaging. 2021;3(5):527-538.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbab060
  3. Buch KA, Qureshi MM, Carpentier B, Cunningham DA, Stone M, Jaffe C, et al. Surveillance of probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions in mammography: what is the right follow-up protocol? Breast Journal. 2015;21(2):168-174.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12387
  4. Nguyen DL, Wilson BM, Oluyemi E, Myers KS, Mullen LA, Panigrahi B, et al. Disparities Associated with Patient Adherence to BI-RADS 3 Assessment Follow-up Recommendations for Mammography and Ultrasound. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2022;19(12):1302-1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2022.08.011
  5. Lee KA, Talati N, Oudsema R, Steinberger S, Margolies LR. BI-RADS 3: Current and Future Use of Probably Benign. Current Radiology Reports. 2018;6(2):5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-018-0266-8
  6. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii po ispol’zovaniyu sistemy BI-RADS pri mammograficheskom obsledovanii. Vasilyev AYu, ed. M. 2017. (In Russ.).
  7. Chung CS, Giess CS, Gombos EC, Frost EP, Yeh ED, Raza S, et al. Patient compliance and diagnostic yield of 18-month unilateral follow-up in surveillance of probably benign mammographic lesions. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2014;202(4):922-927.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11137
  8. Dalal S, Hombal V, Weng WH, Mankovich G, Mabotuwana T, Hall ChS, et al. Determining Follow-Up Imaging Study Using Radiology Reports. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2020;33(1):121-130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00260-w
  9. Lee CS, Berg JM, Berg WA. Cancer Yield Exceeds 2% for BI-RADS 3 Probably Benign Findings in Women Older Than 60 Years in the National Mammography Database. Radiology. 2021;299(3):550-558.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021204031
  10. Kokina DYu, Gombolevskiy VA, Arzamasov KM, Andreychenko AE, Morozov SP. Possibilities and limitations of using machine text-processing tools In Russian radiology reports. Digital Diagnostics. 2022;3(4):374-383. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/DD101099
  11. Ambinder EB, Myers K, Panigrahi B, et al. Breast MRI BI-RADS 3: Impact of Patient-Level Factors on Compliance with Short-Term Follow-Up. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020;17(3): 377-383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.09.001
  12. Donovan JL, Blake DR. Patient non-compliance: deviance or reasoned decision-making? Social Science and Medicine. 1992;34(5): 507-513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90206-6
  13. Dinapoli L, Colloca G, Di Capua B, Valentini V. Psychological Aspects to Consider in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. Current Oncology Reports. 2021;23(3):38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01049-3
  14. Roychowdhury P, Vijayaraghavan GR, Roubil J, Williams IM, Siddiqui E, Vedantham S. Value of BI-RADS 3 Audits. Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research. 2022;41(5):33086-33092. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2022.41.006668
  15. Yabroff KR, Breen N, Vernon SW, Meissner HI, Freedman AN, Ballard-Barbash R. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a US. National Survey. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2004;13(5):723-732. 
  16. Wilkinson L, Gathani T. Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern. British Journal of Radiology. 2022;95(1130):20211033. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211033
  17. Fisenko EP, Vetsheva NN. Primeneniye shkaly BI-RADS pri ul’trazvukovom issledovanii molochnoj zhelezy. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Nauchno-prakticheskiy tsentr meditsinskoj radiologii Departamenta zdravookhraneniya goroda Moskvy. M.: GBUZ g. Moskvy «Nauchno-prakticheskij tsentr meditsinskoj radiologii Departamenta zdravookhraneniya goroda Moskvy»; 2017. (In Russ.).
  18. Kozlov VA, Polyakov BA, Mushnikov DL, Funtikova EL, Nedavniy DA. The quality of early breast cancer diagnosis in urban women by doctors of adult polyclinics. Issledovaniya i praktika v meditsine. 2019;6(4):181-186. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2019-6-4-19
  19. Smalls TE, Heiney SP, Baliko B, Tavakoli AS. Mammography Adherence: Creation of a Process Change Plan to Increase Usage Rates. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2019;23(3):281-287.  https://doi.org/10.1188/19.CJON.281-287
  20. Alabdullatif N, Arrieta A, Dlugasch L, Hu N. The Impact of IT-Based Healthcare Communication on Mammography Screening Utilization among Women in the United States: National Health Interview Survey (2011-2018). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(19):12737. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912737
  21. Morey J, Haney N, Kim W. Applications of AI Beyond Image Interpretation. In: Ranschaer, ER, Morozov S. Algra PR, eds. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Opportunities, Applications and Risks. Springer, Cham; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94878-2_11
  22. Vasilev YuA, Tyrov IA, Vladzymyrskiy AV, Arzamasov KM, Shulkin IM, Kozhikhina DD, Pestrenin LD. Double-reading mammograms using artificial intelligence technologies: A new model of mass preventive examination organization. Digital Diagnostics. 2023;4(2):93-104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/DD321423

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.