Revision surgery after previous spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis

Lebedev V.B.; Epifanov D.S.; Osipov I.I.; Esin A.I.; Kinzyagulov B.R.; Zuev A.A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20238701170

Lebedev V.B.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Epifanov D.S.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Osipov I.I.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Esin A.I.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Kinzyagulov B.R.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Zuev A.A.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

SPIN RSCI: 9377-4574
Scopus AuthorID: 26424155600
ORCID: 0000-0003-2974-1462

Revision surgery after previous spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis

Authors:

Lebedev V.B., Epifanov D.S., Osipov I.I., Esin A.I., Kinzyagulov B.R., Zuev A.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2023;87(1): 70‑76

DOI: 10.17116/neiro20238701170

Read: 3343 times

To cite this article:

Lebedev VB, Epifanov DS, Osipov II, Esin AI, Kinzyagulov BR, Zuev AA. Revision surgery after previous spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2023;87(1):70‑76. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20238701170

Подписка 2025 Журнал «Вопросы нейрохирургии» имени Н.Н. Бурденко (Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Abstract:

Nowadays, vertebral stenosis is the most common indication for surgical treatment in patients over 65 years old in spine surgery. According to the literature, there are conflicting data on the incidence and indications for revision surgery after previous spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence and indications for revision surgery after previous spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective single-center study enrolled 1233 patients with lumbar spine stenosis who underwent spinal decompression and fusion surgery between 2014 and 2018. The number and causes of readmission were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 164 readmissions. Revision surgery at the same level was performed in 63 patients (38.4%), at the higher level — 72 (43.9%), at the lower level — in 29 (17.7%) patients. The most common indication for readmission was spondyloarthrosis with facet joint syndrome (94 (57.3%) patients). The second common complication was pseudoarthrosis (26 (15.9%) patients). These ones comprised 2.1% of all patients with lumbar spine stenosis.

CONCLUSION

The most common indication for readmission was adjacent segment degeneration. The most severe complications requiring complex and even multiple stage revision surgery were pseudoarthrosis and postoperative spondylodiscitis. Causes of readmission are significantly changing at different periods after surgery.

Keywords:

lumbar spine stenosis

revision surgery

pseudoarthrosis

adjacent segment degeneration

decompression and fusion surgery

Authors:

Lebedev V.B.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Epifanov D.S.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Osipov I.I.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Esin A.I.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Kinzyagulov B.R.

Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center

Zuev A.A.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

SPIN RSCI: 9377-4574
Scopus AuthorID: 26424155600
ORCID: 0000-0003-2974-1462

Received:

31.01.2022

Accepted:

11.10.2022

Close metadata

References:

Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleâs F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine. 2000;25:1424-1435. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200006010-00016
Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, Dalin-Hirvonen N, Seitsalo S, Herno A, Kortekangas P, Niinimäki T, Rönty H, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Härkänen T, Hurri H. Finnish Lumbar Spinal Research Group. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H. SPORT Investigators. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. The England journal of medicine. 2008;358:794-810. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0707136
Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgström F, Fritzell P, Öhagen P, Michaëlsson K, Sandén B. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. The England journal of medicine. 2016;374(15):1413-1423. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1513721
Wang H, Ma L, Yang D, Wang T, Yang S, Wang Y, Wang Q, Zhang F, Ding W. Incidence and risk factors for the progression of proximal junctional kyphosis in degenerative lumbar scoliosis following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Medicine. 2016;95:4443. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004443
Narverud SF, Ramli NB, Chandran H, Ganesan D. Calcified pseudomeningocele of the lumbar spine: A review. European Spine Journal. 2013;22(3):443-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2610-7
Akhaddar A, Boulahroud O, Boucetta M. Nerve root herniation into a calcified pseudomeningocele after lumbar laminectomy. The Spine Journal. 2012;12:273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.008
Drysch A, Ajiboye RM, Sharma A, Li J, Reza T, Harley D, Park DY, Pourtaheri S. Effectiveness of reoperations for adjacent segment disease following lumbar spinal fusion. Orthopedics. 2018;41:161-167. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20170621-02
Maruenda JI, Barrios C, Garibo F, Maruenda B. Adjacent segment degeneration and revision surgery after circumferen- tial lumbar fusion: outcomes throughout 15 years of follow-up. European Spine Journal. 2016;25:1550-1557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0058 6-016-4469-5
Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine. 2007;32:382-387. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000254104.55716.46
Tokuhashi Y, Ajiro Y, Umezawa N. Follow-up of patients with delayed union after posterior fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Spine. 2008;33(7):786-791. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816956f7
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Rao PJ. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as a Salvage Technique for Pseudarthrosis following Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery. Global Spine Journal. 2016;6(1):14-20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555656
Yun DJ, Yu JW, Jeon SH, Lee HC, Lee SH. Salvage Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Pseudoarthrosis After Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of 10 Patients. World Neurosurgery. 2018;111:746-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.155