The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Brzheskiy V.V.

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Modern possibilities of pathogenetically oriented therapy for dry eye syndrome

Authors:

Brzheskiy V.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2023;139(2): 95‑103

Read: 4657 times


To cite this article:

Brzheskiy VV. Modern possibilities of pathogenetically oriented therapy for dry eye syndrome. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2023;139(2):95‑103. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202313902195

Recommended articles:
Evaluation of the effi­ciency of combined pharmaco-physiotherapy in patients with dry eye syndrome. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(6-2):91-95

References:

  1. Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, et al. TFOS DEWS II Management and therapy report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:575-628.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006
  2. Wirta D, Torkildsen GL, Boehmer B, Hollander DA, Bendert E, Zeng L, Ackermann M, Nau J. ONSET-1 Phase 2b randomized trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OC-01 (Varenicline Solution) nasal spray on signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. Cornea. 2022;41(10):1207-1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.11.004
  3. Brzheskiy VV. Combined preparations of artificial tears in the treatment of patients with dry eye syndrome. Rossijskij oftal’mologicheskij zhurnal. 2022; 15(2):154-159. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-2-154-159
  4. Tauber J, Wirta DL, Sall K, Majmudar PA, Willen D, Krösser S. A randomized clinical study (SEECASE) to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of NOV03 for treatment of dry eye disease. Cornea. 2021;40(9):1132-1140. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002622
  5. Brzheskiy VV, Popov VYu, Efimova EL, Golubev SYu. Modern possibilities of diagnostics and treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik Oftal’mologii. 2022;138(6):123-13.2 (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2022138061123
  6. Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, et al. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:438-510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011
  7. Brzheskiy VV, Egorova GB, Egorov EA. Sindrom suhogo glaza i zabolevaniya glaznoj poverhnosti: klinika diagnostika lechenie [Dry eye syndrome and ocular surface diseases: clinic, diagnosis, treatment]. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2016. (In Russ.).
  8. Boboridis KG, Konstas AGP. Evaluating the novel application of cyclosporine 0.1% in ocular surface disease. Exp Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19(9):1027-1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2018.1479742
  9. Matsuda S, Koyasu S. Mechanisms of action of cyclosporine. Immunopharmacology. 2000;47(2-3):119-125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0162-3109(00)00192-2
  10. Li Y, Johnson N, Capano M, et al. Cyclophilin-D promotes the mitochondrial permeability transition but has opposite effects on apoptosis and necrosis. Biochem J. 2004;383:101-109.  https://doi.org/10.1042/bj20040669
  11. Gorantla VS, Barker JH, Jones JJW, et al. Immunosuppressive agents in transplantation: mechanisms of action and current anti-rejection strategies. Microsurgery. 2000;20(8):420-429.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2752(2000)20:8<420::aid-micr13>3.0.co;2-o
  12. Utine CA, Stern M, Akpek EK. Clinical review: topical ophthalmic use of cyclosporin A. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2010;18(5):352-361.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2010.498657
  13. Leonardi A, Modugno RL, Salami E. Allergy and dry eye disease. Ocul Immunol Inflam. 2021;29(6):1168-1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2020.1841804
  14. BenEzra D, Maftzir G, Courten C, Timonen P. Ocular penetration of cyclosporin A. III: the human eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:350-352.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.74.6.350
  15. Palestine AG, Nussenblatt RB, Chan CC. Side effects of systemic cyclosporine in patients not undergoing transplantation. Am J Med. 1984;77:652-656.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(84)90356-5
  16. Lallemand F, Schmitt M, Bourges J-L, et al. Cyclosporine A delivery to the eye: A comprehensive review of academic and industrial efforts. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2017;117:14-28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.03.006
  17. Kanai A, Alba RM, Takano T, et al. The effect on the cornea of alpha-cyclodextrin vehicle for cyclosporin eye drops. Transplant Proc. 1989;21:3150-3152. https://doi.org/10.26226/morressier.57d6b2bad462b8028d88d2ec
  18. Laibovitz RA, Solch S, Andriano K, et al. Pilot trial of cyclosporin 1% ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Cornea. 1993;12(4):315-323.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199307000-00007
  19. Newton C, Gebhard BM, Kaufman HE. Topically applied cyclosporine in azone prolongs corneal allograft survival. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988; 29:208-215. 
  20. Kaufman HE. Neue Ansätze bei der topischen Medikamentenapplikation und der Behandlung des trockenen Auges. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1993; 202(3):195-198.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1045582
  21. Gao J, Sana R, Calder V, et al. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore in inflammatory apoptosis of human conjunctival epithelial cells and T cells: effect of cyclosporin A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:4717-4733. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-11681
  22. Majchuk DYu. Eksperimental’naya mediko-biologicheskaya ocenka i razrabotka metodov primeneniya lizosomal’nyh glaznyh kapel’ ciklosporina: Dis. ... kand.med. nauk [Experimental biomedical evaluation and development of methods for the use of lysosomal eye drops of cyclosporine: Dis. ... cand. medical sciences]. M. 1997. (In Russ).
  23. Tsubota K, Fujita H, Tadano K, et al. Improvement of lacrimal function by topical application of CyA in murine models of Sjogren’s syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(1):101-110. 
  24. Pflugfelder SC, De Paiva CS, Villarreal AL, Stern ME. Effects of sequential artificial tear and cyclosporine emulsion therapy on conjunctival goblet cell density and transforming growth factor-beta2 production. Cornea. 2008;27(1): 64-69.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e318158f6dc
  25. Sall K, Stevenson OD, Mundorf TK, et al. Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:631-639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00176-1
  26. Kunert KS, Tisdale AS, Gipson IK. Goblet cell numbers and epithelial proliferation in the conjunctiva of patients with dry eye syndrome treated with cyclosporine. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:330-337.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.120.3.330
  27. Strong B, Farley W, Stern ME, Pflugfelder SC. Topical cyclosporine inhibits conjunctival epithelial apoptosis in experimental murine keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Cornea. 2005;24(1):80-85.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000133994.22392.47
  28. Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Sonmez B, et al. Clinical utility of objective tests for dry eye disease: variability over time and implications for clinical trials and disease management. Cornea. 2012;31(9):1000-1008. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e318242fd60
  29. Brown MM, Brown GC, Brown HC, et al. Value-based medicine, comparative effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness analysis of topical cyclosporine for the treatment of dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(2):146-152.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.608
  30. Rubin M, Rao SN. Efficacy of topical cyclosporin 0.05% in the treatment of posterior blepharitis. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2006;22(1):47-53.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2006.22.47
  31. Schechter BA, Katz RS, Friedman LS. Efficacy of topical cyclosporine for the treatment of ocular rosacea. Adv Ther. 2009;26(6):651-659.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-009-0037-2
  32. Prabhasawat P, Tesavibul N, Karnchanachetanee C, Kasemson S. Efficacy of cyclosporine 0.05% eye drops in Stevens Johnson syndrome with chronic dry eye. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2013;29(3):372-377.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2012.0009
  33. Roberts CW, Carniglia PE, Brazzo BG. Comparison of topical cyclosporine, punctal occlusion, and a combination for the treatment of dry eye. Cornea. 2007;26(7):805-809.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e318074e460
  34. Nagra PK, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, et al. Thygeson’s superficial punctate keratitis: ten years’ experience. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:34-37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.05.002
  35. Kervick GN, Pflugfelder SC, Haimovici R, et al. Paracentral rheumatoid corneal ulceration. Clinical features and cyclosporine therapy. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:80-88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(92)32006-8
  36. Pflugfelder SC, Karpecki PM, Perez VL. Treatment of blepharitis: recent clinical trials. Ocul Surf. 2014;12:273-284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2014.05.005
  37. Germanova VN, Volzhanin AV, Zolotarev AV, et al. Cyclosporine A in the surgical treatment of glaucoma: prospects and opportunities. Nacional’nyj zhurnal glaucoma. 2017;16(2):92-100. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2020136041130
  38. Sacchetti M, Mantelli F, Lambiase A, et al. Systematic review of randomised clinical trials on topical ciclosporin A for the treatment of dry eye disease. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(8):1016-1022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304072
  39. Wilson SE, Perry HD. Long-term resolution of chronic dry eye symptoms and signs after topical cyclosporine treatment. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1): 76-79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.077
  40. Ridder WH. Ciclosporin use in dry eye disease patients. Exp Opin Pharmacother. 2008;17(9):3121-3128. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656560802500613
  41. Brzheskiy VV, Majchuk DYu. New possibilities of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with dry eye syndrome. Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2012; 5(1):69-74. (In Russ.).
  42. Mandal A, Gote V, Pal D, et al. Ocular pharmacokinetics of a topical ophthalmic Nanomicellar solution of cyclosporine (Cequa) for dry eye disease. Pharm Res. 2019;36:36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-018-2556-5
  43. Labbe A, Baudouin C, Ismail D, et al. Pan-European survey of the topical ocular ciclosporin A. J Franc Ophthalmol. 2017;40:187-195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2016.12.004
  44. Perry HD, Solomon R, Donnenfeld ED, et al. Evaluation of topical cyclosporine for the treatment of dry eye disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(8): 1046-1050. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.8.1046
  45. Eroglu YI. A comparative review of Haute Autorit de Sant and National Institute for health and care excellence health technology assessments of Ikervis to treat severe keratitis in adult patients with dry eye disease which has not improved despite treatment with tear substitutes. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017;5:1336043. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1336043
  46. Leonardi A, Van Setten G, Amrane M, et al. Efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in the treatment of severe dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized trial. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26(4):287-296.  https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000779
  47. Garrigue J-S, Amrane M, Faure M-O, et al. Relevance of lipid-based products in the management of dry eye disease. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017; 33(9):647-661.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2017.0052
  48. Daull P, Feraille L, Barabino S, et al. Efficacy of a new topical cationic emulsion of cyclosporine A on dry eye clinical signs in an experimental mouse model of dry eye. Exp Eye Res. 2016;153:159-164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2016.10.016
  49. Lallemand F, Daull P, Benita S, et al. Successfully improving ocular drug delivery using the cationic nanoemulsion, novasorb. J Drug Deliv. 2012; 2012:604204. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/604204
  50. Baudouin C, Figueiredo FC, Messmer EM, et al. A randomized study of the efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in treatment of moderate to severe dry eye. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27:520-530.  https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000952
  51. Periman LM, Mah FS, Karpecki PM. A review of the mechanism of action of Cyclosporine A: The role of Cyclosporine A in dry eye disease and recent formulation developments. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:4187-4200. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s279051
  52. Leonardi A, Van Setten G, Amrane M, et al. Author’s reply to: «Concerns over: efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in the treatment of severe dry eye disease». Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27:194-195.  https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5001043
  53. Baudouin C, de la Maza MS, Amrane M, et al. One-year efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in the treatment of severe dry eye disease. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2017;27(6):678-685.  https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5001002
  54. Labetoulle M, Leonardi A, Amrane M, et al. Persistence of efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporin a cationic emulsion in subjects with severe keratitis due to dry eye disease: a nonrandomized, open-label extension of the SANSIKA Study. Clin Ther. 2018;40(11):1894-1906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.09.012
  55. Leonardi A, Messmer EM, Labetoulle M, et al. Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:125-131.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311801
  56. Deshmukh R, Ting DSJ, Elsahn A, et al. Real-world experience of using ciclosporin-A 0.1% (Ikervis) in the management of ocular surface inflammatory diseases. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2021;0:1-6.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317907
  57. Hind J, Macdonald E, Lockington D. Real-world experience at a Scottish university teaching hospital regarding the tolerability and persistence with topical Ciclosporin 0.1% (Ikervis) treatment in patients with dry eye disease. Eye. 2019;33:685-686.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0289-7
  58. Pisella PJ, Labetoulle M, Doan S, et al. Topical ocular 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease patients with severe keratitis: experience through the French early-access program. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:289-299.  https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s150957
  59. Baudouin C, Brignole F, Pisella PJ, De Saint Jean M, Goguel A. (2002). Flow Cytometric Analysis of the Inflammatory Marker HLA DR in Dry Eye Syndrome: Results from 12 Months of Randomized Treatment with Topical Cyclosporin A. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506(Pt B):761-769.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0717-8_107

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.