The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Iomdina E.N.

FGBU "Moskovskiĭ NII glaznykh bolezneĭ im. Gel'mgol'tsa" Minzdrava Rossii

Klevtsov E.A.

Yelatma Instrument Making Enterprise, JSC, 16 Trubezhnaya St., Ryazan, Russian Federation, 390000

Ivanishchev K.V.

Yelatma Instrument Making Enterprise, JSC, 16 Trubezhnaya St., Ryazan, Russian Federation, 390000

Kiseleva O.A.

FGBU "Moskovskiĭ NII glaznykh bolezneĭ im. Gel'mgol'tsa" Minzdrava Rossii

Bessmertny A.M.

Helmholtz Moscow Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062

Filippova O.M.

Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062

Luzhnov P.V.

Yelatma Instrument Making Enterprise, JSC, 16 Trubezhnaya St., Ryazan, Russian Federation, 390000

Shamaev D.M.

Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 5/1 2-ya Baumanskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105005

Uslontsev D.N.

Ryazan Regional Bureau of Forensic Medical Examination, 18 Vostochnyi Promuzel, Ryazan region, Russian Federation, 390047

Experimental simulation for determining optimal design parameters of a transpalpebral tonometry sensor

Authors:

Iomdina E.N., Klevtsov E.A., Ivanishchev K.V., Kiseleva O.A., Bessmertny A.M., Filippova O.M., Luzhnov P.V., Shamaev D.M., Uslontsev D.N.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(6): 27‑32

Read: 3432 times


To cite this article:

Iomdina EN, Klevtsov EA, Ivanishchev KV, et al. . Experimental simulation for determining optimal design parameters of a transpalpebral tonometry sensor. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(6):27‑32. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913506127

Recommended articles:
Long-term outcomes of phakic intraocular lens implantation in high myopia. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(1):28-31
Modern devi­ces for microinvasive glaucoma surgery. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(5):101-108

References:

  1. Volkov VV. Glaukoma otkrytougol’naja. M.: Mia; 2008. (In Russ.)
  2. Erichev VP, Egorov AE. On pathogenesis of primary open-angle glaucoma. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2014;130(6):98-105. (In Russ.)
  3. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38(1):1-30.
  4. Özcura F, Yildirim N, Sahin A, Çolak E. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eye. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015;8(2):299-304.
  5. Kouchaki B, Hashemi H, Yekta A, Khabazkhoob M. Comparison of current tonometry techniques in measurement of intraocular pressure. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016;29(2):92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.08.010
  6. Wachtl J, Töteberg-Harms M, Frimmel S, Roos M, Kniestedt C. Correlation between dynamic contour tonometry, uncorrected and corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry, and stage of glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(6):601-608. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1012
  7. Andreanos K, Koutsandrea C, Papaconstantinou D, et al. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:2477-2484. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S115203
  8. Kontiola AI. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 2000;78(2):142-145.
  9. Kim KN, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Yang MK, Kim DM. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(5):392-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12109
  10. Achiron A, Blumenfeld O, Avizemer H, et al. Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: A comparative study. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016;39(10):822-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2016.09.009
  11. Vostrukhin SV, Agadzhanyan TM, Fokina ND, Sherstneva LV. Tonometry peculiarities after keratorefractive surgery. Literature review. RMZH. Klinicheskaja oftal’mologija. 2015;2:77-82. (In Russ.)
  12. Vostrukhin SV. The effect of keratorefractive surgery on the intraocular pressure measurement. Natsional’nyj Zhurnal Glaukoma. 2015;14(2):82-92. (In Russ.)
  13. Illarionova AR, Piletzky NG. Research results of intraocular pressure reliability indication by transpalpebral tonometer (TGD-01 PRA). RMZH. Klinicheskaja oftal’mologija. 2001;2:55-56. (In Russ.)
  14. Golovkov OL, Ivanishchev KV. Sposob izmerenija vnutriglaznogo davlenija cherez veko I ustrojstvo dlja ego osushchestvlenija (varianty). Patent RF №2335234, 10.10.08. (In Russ.)
  15. Filippova OM. Transpalpebral tonometry: new possibilities of intraocular pressure registration. Glaucoma. 2004;1:54-56. (In Russ.)
  16. Avetisov SE, Erichev VP, Antonov AA. Diagnostic capabilities of transpalpebral tonometry with IGD-03. Natsional’nyj Zhurnal Glaukoma. 2016;15(3):17-23. (In Russ.)
  17. Makashova NV, Ivanishchev KV. Clinical results of transpalpebral tonometry. Glaukoma. Zhurnal NII glaznykh boleznej RAMN. 2013;2:42-46. (In Russ.)
  18. Dykin VI, Ivanishchev KV, Kornev NP, Mikheev AA, Solomakha VN. Intraocular pressure dynamic type tonometer. Meditsinskaya tekhnika. 2013;4(280):33-36. (In Russ.)

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.