Conceptual approach to classification of implant supported prosthesis for edentulous patients

Trezubov V.N.; Rozov R.A.; Azarin G.S.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201796151-55

Trezubov V.N.

Rozov R.A.

Kafedra ortopedicheskoj stomatologii i materialovedenija s kursom ortodontii GBOU VPO «PSPbGMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova», Minzdrava Rossii, Sankt-Peterburg

SPIN RSCI: 1173-7870
Scopus AuthorID: 57205048723
ResearcherID: E-3677-2019
ORCID: 0000-0001-5804-9497

Azarin G.S.

Kafedra ortopedicheskoj stomatologii i materialovedenija s kursom ortodontii GBOU VPO «PSPbGMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova», Minzdrava Rossii, Sankt-Peterburg

Conceptual approach to classification of implant supported prosthesis for edentulous patients

Authors:

Trezubov V.N., Rozov R.A., Azarin G.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2017;96(1): 51‑55

DOI: 10.17116/stomat201796151-55

Read: 912 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Trezubov VN, Rozov RA, Azarin GS. Conceptual approach to classification of implant supported prosthesis for edentulous patients. Stomatology. 2017;96(1):51‑55. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201796151-55

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Abstract:

The aim of this study was the creation of a conceptual model of the standard implant prosthetics for edentulous patients using the data of comprehensive examination and implantation prosthetics in 372 patients aged 38 to 80 years (201 women, 171 men) with 582 implant supported prosthesis of various types, supporting on implants «Nobel Replace Select/Groove» and «Nobel Speedy Groove» (3675 implants). Clinical classification of implant-supported prosthesis for edentulous patients included 5 classes: class 1 (1—2 implants) included 6.2% of implant supported prosthesis, class 2 (3—4 implant) — 19.2% of prostheses, class 3 (5—6 implants) — 30.2% of replacement structures; IV (7—10 implants) — 44%, and V — 0,3%. Restoration class was age-dependent.

Keywords:

implant-retained prosthetics in edentulous patients

implant-prosthodontic classification

implant-supported immediately loaded fixed full-arch dentures

implant supported prosthesis standard for edentulous patients

Authors:

Trezubov V.N.

Rozov R.A.

Kafedra ortopedicheskoj stomatologii i materialovedenija s kursom ortodontii GBOU VPO «PSPbGMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova», Minzdrava Rossii, Sankt-Peterburg

SPIN RSCI: 1173-7870
Scopus AuthorID: 57205048723
ResearcherID: E-3677-2019
ORCID: 0000-0001-5804-9497

Azarin G.S.

Kafedra ortopedicheskoj stomatologii i materialovedenija s kursom ortodontii GBOU VPO «PSPbGMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova», Minzdrava Rossii, Sankt-Peterburg

Close metadata

References:

Kulakov A.A., Losev F.F., Gvetadze R.Sh. Zubnaya implantatsiya: osnovnye printsipy, sovremennye dostizheniya. M.: Meditsinskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo; 2006.
Rozov R.A., Gerasimov A.B., Shpynova A.M., Azarin G.S., Gusev A.V. Osobennosti protezirovaniya s"emnymi implantatsionnymi zameshchayushchimi konstruktsiyami. Forum praktikuyushchikh stomatologov. 2013;1(7):16-31.
Rozov R.A., Gusev A.V., Emdin L.M., Gerasimov A.B., Azarin G.S. Otdalennye rezul'taty protezirovaniya protyazhennymi metallokeramicheskimi implantatsionnymi konstruktsiyami s karkasami, poluchennymi tekhnologiei komp'yuternogo frezerovaniya iz kobal'to-khromovogo splava. Forum praktikuyushchikh stomatologov. 2013;3(9):4-16.
Att W, Bernhart J, Strub JR. Fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: possibilities and clinical outcome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(11 suppl):60-73.
Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(4):539-545.
Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132.
Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Loi I, Viola P, Ferri V, Leone M, Collivasone D, Esposito M. Immediate loading of bimaxillary total fixed prostheses supported by five flapless-placed implants with machined surfaces: A 6-month follow-up prospective single cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(1):67-74.
Greenstein G, Cavallaro J Jr. Cantilevers extending from unilateral implant-supported fixed prostheses: a review of the literature and presentation of practical guidelines. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(10):1221-1230.
Ismail HA, Mahrous AI, Banasr FH, Soliman TA, Baraka Y. Two Years Retrospective Evaluation of Overdenture Retained by Symphyseal Single Implant Using Two Types of Attachments. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(6):4-8.
Lambert FE, Weber HP, Susarla SM, Belser UC, Gallucci GO. Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla. J Periodontol. 2009;80(8):1220-1230.
Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. «All-on-Four» immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(suppl 1):2-9.
Papadimitriou DE, Salari S, Gannam C, Gallucci GO, Friedland B. Implant-prosthodontic classification of the edentulous jaw for treatment planning with fixed rehabilitations. Int J Prosthodont. 2014;27(4):320-327.
Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Chuang SK, Weber HP. Implant loading protocols for edentulous patients with fixed prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(suppl):256-270.
Schimmel M, Srinivasan M, Herrmann FR, Müller F. Loading protocols for implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous jaw: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;(29 suppl):271-286.
Stafford GL. Survival rates of short-span implant-supported cantilever fixed dental prostheses. Evid Based Dent. 2010;11(2):50-51.
Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial