The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Palastin P.M.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Neonatology, Acad. I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia

Bezhenar' V.F.

NII akusherstva i ginekologii im. D.O. Otta RAMN, Sankt-Peterburg

Petrov A.V.

State Research Institute of Highly Pure Biopreparations, Federal Biomedical Agency, St. Petersburg, Russia

A local immune response to a synthetic polypropylene implant (an experimental study)

Authors:

Palastin P.M., Bezhenar' V.F., Petrov A.V.

More about the authors

Read: 1080 times


To cite this article:

Palastin PM, Bezhenar' VF, Petrov AV. A local immune response to a synthetic polypropylene implant (an experimental study). Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2019;19(2):47‑51. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20191902147

Recommended articles:
Evolution of surgical methods for correction of pelvic organ prolapse. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(1):31-36
Use of xeno­genic biomaterials in gyne­cologic practice of pelvic organ prolapse correction. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(3):50-56
“Classical” sacrocolpopexy as a method of surgical correction of apical geni­tal prolapse. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(5):92-97
Rege­nerative modu­lators use in the surgical treatment of ante­rior abdo­minal wall hernias. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2025;(1):63-70

References:

  1. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nelsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13:4:343-403.
  2. Reynolds WS, Gold KP, Ni S, Kaufman MR, Dmochowski RR, Penson DF. Immediate effects of the initial FDA notification on the use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in medicare beneficiaries. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32:4:330-335.
  3. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, Hakakha M. Biomaterials for abdominal wall hernia surgery and principles of the irapplications. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379:168—171.
  4. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:103-113.
  5. Muffly T, Barber MD. Insertion and removal of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010; 53:1:99-114.
  6. Bezhenar´ VF. Complications of pelvic prolapse correction using the Prolift prolene system. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2012;4(2):116-121. (In Russ.)
  7. Popov AA, Krasnopol´skaya IV, Tyurina SS, Fedorov AA, Slobodyanyuk B.A. Sacrospinous fixation in the treatment of women with genital prolapse in the era of mesh technologies. Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2013;13:2:36-41. (In Russ.)
  8. Perepelova TA, Gazazyan MG, Bezhin AI, Ishunina TA. Clinical and morphological assessment of the lower uterus segment after cesarean section. Akusherstvo, ginekologiya i reproduktologiya. 2016; 10:1:111-118. (In Russ.)
  9. Huffaker RK, Muir TW, Rao A. Histologic response of porcine collagen-coated and uncoated polypropylene grafts in a rabbit vagina model.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:5:582.e1-e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.029
  10. Souza-Pinto FJ, Moretti AI, Cury V. Induciblenitric oxide synthase inhibition increases MMP-2 activity leading to imbalance between extracellular matrix deposition and degradation after polypropylene mesh implant. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101:5:1379-1387.
  11. Anderson JM, Miller KM. Biomaterial biocompatibility and the macrophage. Biomaterials. 1984;5:1:5-10.
  12. Bhardwaj RS, Henze U, Klein B. Monocyte–biomaterial interaction inducing phenotypic dynamics of monocytes: a possible role of monocyte subsets in biocompatibility. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997;8:12:737-742.
  13. Zakharov AA, Il´ina NA. Clinical manifestations of blastocyst invasion. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii. 2010;9:88-90. (In Russ.)
  14. Palastin PM, Bezhenar´ VF, Petrov AV. A method for assessing the biocompatibility of mesh synthetic implants: Pat. 2607656 the Russian Federation: IPC GOIN 33/48 (2006.01). Ofitsial´nyi bulleten´ «Izobreteniya. Poleznye modeli». 2017;1. (In Russ.)

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.