The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Telyakova M.I.

Ural Scientific Research Institute of Maternity and Child Care Public Health’s Ministry of the Russian Federation

Mikhelson A.A.

Ural Scientific Research Institute of Maternity and Child Care Public Health’s Ministry of the Russian Federation

Okulova E.O.

Ural Scientific Research Institute of Maternity and Child Care Public Health’s Ministry of the Russian Federation

Pogorelko D.V.

Ural Scientific Research Institute of Maternity and Child Care

Lazukina M.V.

Ural Research Institute of Maternity and Child Care

Clinical and anamnestic features of patients with endometriosis of an incompetent uterine scar after cesarian section

Authors:

Telyakova M.I., Mikhelson A.A., Okulova E.O., Pogorelko D.V., Lazukina M.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2022;28(5): 100‑106

Read: 2815 times


To cite this article:

Telyakova MI, Mikhelson AA, Okulova EO, Pogorelko DV, Lazukina MV. Clinical and anamnestic features of patients with endometriosis of an incompetent uterine scar after cesarian section. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2022;28(5):100‑106. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/repro202228051100

Recommended articles:
Cesa­rean section in modern obstetrics: problems and ways to overcome them. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(4):5-18

References:

  1. World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme, 10 April 2015. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Reproductive Health Matters. 2015;23(45):149-150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007
  2. Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging manifestations of cesarean scar defect in reproductive-aged women. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016;23(6):893-902.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.020
  3. Adamyan LV, Andreeva EN, Apolikhina IA, Bezhenar VF, Gevorkyan MA, Gus AI, Demidov VN, Kalinina EA, Levakov SA, Marchenko LA, Popov AA, Sonova MM, Khashukoeva AZ, Chernukha GE, Yarotskaya EL. Endometrioz: diagnostika, lechenie i reabilitaciya. Federal’nye klinicheskie rekomendacii po vedeniyu bol’nyh. M.: Rossijskoe obshchestvo akusherov-ginekologov; 2013. Accessed June 01, 2022. (In Russ.). https://moniiag.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Endometrioz-diagnostika-i-lechenie.pdf?ysclid=l4a1gbnrkx456120064
  4. Galimov OV, Ziangirov RA, Alimov V, Safin IN, Khanov VO, Kostina YuV, Lapteva KM. Endometriosis of Postoperative Scar. Mediko-farmacevticheskij zhurnal Pul’s. 2019;21(9):56-60. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2019-21-9-56-60
  5. Poismans G, Tolbize N, Gielen F, Lipombi D. Post-caesarean abdominalwall endometriosis prevention. Revue Medicale de liege. 2016;71(4):193-197. 
  6. Machairiotis N, Stylianaki A, Dryllis G, Zarogoulidis P, Kouroutou P, Tsiamis N, Katsikogiannis N, Sarika E, Courcoutsakis N, Tsiouda T, Gschwendtner A, Zarogoulidis K, Sakkas L, Baliaka A, Machairiotis C. Extrapelvic endometriosis: a rare entity or an under diagnosed condition? Diagnostic Pathology. 2013;8:194.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-8-194
  7. Youssef AT. The ultrasound of subcutaneous extrapelvic endometriosis. Journal of Ultrasonography. 2020;20(82):176-180.  https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2020.0029
  8. Chui MH, Wang TL, Shih IM. Endometriosis: benign, malignant, or something in between? Oncotarget. 2017;8(45):78263-78264. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21051
  9. Shchukina NA, Buyanova SN, Chechneva MA, Budykina TS, Blagina EI, Sibryaeva VL. Organ-saving surgery in a patient with necrotizing endometritis and incompetent suture on the uterus after cesarean section. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2016;16(4): 80-84. (In Russ.).
  10. Florio P, Filippeschi M, Moncini I, Marra E, Franchini M, Gubbini G. Hysteroscopic treatment of the cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring infertility. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;24(3):180-186.  https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0b013e3283521202
  11. Bakavičiūtė G, Špiliauskaitė S, Meškauskienė A, Ramašauskaitė D. Laparoscopic repair of the uterine scar defect — successful treatment of secondary infertility: a case report and literature review. Acta Medica Lituanica. 2016;23(4):227-231.  https://doi.org/10.6001/actamedica.v23i4.3424
  12. Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, Witmer M, Veersema S, Brölmann HA, Bourne T, Huirne JA. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;43(4):372-382.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13199
  13. Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Brölmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA. Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Human Reproduction. 2015;30(12):2695-2702. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev240
  14. Van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2014;121(2):236-244.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12542

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.