Anatomical and surgical research in neurosurgery. Traditions and trends

Close metadata

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgery is a high-tech surgical specialty in which available quantitative anatomical research must be carried out using modern surgical technologies and modern approaches.

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of data from available literature and the experience of the authors in the study of intracranial neurosurgical approaches, taking into account changing trends and technical progress.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The article analyzes domestic and foreign experience in anatomical and surgical studies of intracranial approaches based on data from 50 sources, and also presents the results of the authors’ own research.

CONCLUSION

Conducting anatomical and surgical research in neurosurgery at the modern level is advisable only with the use of the entire complex of technical means used in the operating room, and especially computer navigation.

Keywords:

neurosurgery

quantitative anatomical studies

intracranial approach

Authors:

Zakondyrin D.E.

ORCID: 0000-0002-0925-415X

Dydykin S.S.

ORCID: 0000-0002-1273-0356

Vasiliev Yu.L.

ORCID: 0000-0003-3541-6068

Trunin E.M.

I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-2452-0321

Tatarkin V.V.

I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-9599-3935

Laptina V.I.

ORCID: 0000-0002-6402-8868

Mellin R.V.

G.Ya. Remishevskaya Republican Clinical Hospital

ORCID: 0000-0002-1587-0581

Tambovthev S.A.

National Research Mordovia State University

ORCID: 0000-0002-7514-1153

Gavrilov A.V.

Lomonosov Moscow State University

ORCID: 0000-0002-7838-584X

Dolotova D.D.

Gammamed-Soft, Ltd

ORCID: 0000-0002-5538-1109

Sarmadian R.

ORCID: 0009-0007-9612-7442

Dubkov V.D.

ORCID: 0009-0003-9642-160X

Novichkova D.A.

Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

ORCID: 0009-0006-1409-1996

Stecik E.O.

Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

ORCID: 0009-0001-5865-1629

Received:

13.11.2024

Accepted:

12.12.2024

List of references:

Nikityuk D.B., Dydykin S.S., Kagan I.I., Zadnipryany I.V., Vasil’ev Yu.L., Kapitonova M.Yu. About the first edition of the International Neuronatomical Terminology (TNA) and its Russian equivalent. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2024; 8(2):42-50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/operhirurg2024802142
Zakondyrin, D.E., Semenov, G.M. Anatomical Features of Transcranial Access to the Orbital Cavity. Neurosci Behav Physi. 2011; 41: 759-762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-011-9483-9
Belov I.Yu., Gulyaev D.A., Primak N.A., Chebotarev S.Ya., Gorban’ V.V. Anatomical-topographic comparison of surgical approaches to pterygopalatine fossa and infratemporal fossa. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2014;(4):32-37. (In Russ.)
Agosti E, De Maria L, Mattogno PP, Della Pepa GM, D’Onofrio GF, Fiorindi A, Lauretti L, Olivi A, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F. Quantitative anatomical studies in neurosurgery: a systematic and critical review of research methods. Life. 2023;13:1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13091822
Wu H, Maimaiti A, Xie Q, Aili Y, Muertizha M, Zhu G, Mijiti M, Li Y, Wang Y. Quantitative anatomical study of the supratentorial and infratentorial «endoscopic keyhole» approach to the peripineal region. Int J Clin Pract. 2024;6851468. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6851468
Abramov I, Labib MA, Houlihan LM, Loymak T, Srinivasan VM, Preul MC, Lawton MT. Quantitative anatomic comparison of the extreme lateral transodontoid vs extreme medial endoscopic endonasal approaches to the jugular foramen and craniovertebral junction. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022;23(5):396-405. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000350
Salma A, Alkandari A, Sammet S, Amiratti M. Lateral supraorbital approach vs pterional approach: an anatomic qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(2):364-372. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318211721f
Kodera T, Akazawa A, Yamada S, Arai H, Yamauchi T, Higashino Y, Arishima H, Iino S, Noriki S, Kikuta KI. Quantitative analysis of the far-lateral, supra-articular transcondylar transtubercular approach using cadaveric computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Operative Neurosurg. 2020;19(5):E498-E509. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opaa035
Topczewski TE, Di Somma A, Pineda J, Ferres A, Torales J, Reyes L, Morillas R, Solari D, Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Enseñat J, Prats-Galino A. Endoscopic endonasal and transorbital routes to the petrous apex: anatomic comparative study of two pathways. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(9):2097-2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04451-1
Kalandari AA, Levchenko OV, Zakondyrin DE, Kutrovskaya NYu. Anatomical study of the possibilities of endoscopic transnasal and endoscopic transorbital medial orbitotomy and decompression of the optic nerve. Neyrokhirurgiya = Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019;21(3): 44-49 (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2019-21-3-52-57
Melchenko AA, Cherekaev VA, Sufianov AA, Nikolenko VN, Golodnev GE, Shumeiko TS, Gizatullin MR, Golbin DA, Lasunin NV, Shelyagin IS, Surikov AA, Senko IV. Topographic anatomy of two-piece orbitozygomatic, modified orbitozygomatic and transzygomatic approaches: A comparative analysis of neurosurgical options. Science and innovations in medicine. 2023;8(1):4-12. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35693/2500-1388-2023-8-1-4-12
Evins AI, Sistiaga IL, Quispe-Flores AH, Castro MM, Atchley TJ, Pérez-Fernández S, Pomposo I, Stieg PE, Bernardo A. Quantitative comparative surgical analysis of the endoscopic transorbital approach and frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic approach for extradural exposure of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurg Focus. 2024;56(4):E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.1.FOCUS23860
Zanin L, Agosti E, Ebner F, de Maria L, Belotti F, Buffoli B, Rezzani R, Hirt B, Ravanelli M, Ius T, Zeppieri M, Tatagiba MS, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F. Quantitative anatomical comparison of surgical approaches to Meckel’s cave. J Clin Med. 2023;12(21):6847. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216847
Saraceno G, Agosti E, Qiu J, Buffoli B, Ferrari M, Raffetti E, Belotti F, Ravanelli M, Mattavelli D, Schreiber A, Hirtler L, Rodella LF, Maroldi R, Nicolai P, Gentili F, Kucharczyk W, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F. Quantitative anatomical comparison of anterior, anterolateral and lateral, microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to the middle cranial fossa. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:e682-e730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.178.
García-Pérez D, Abarca J, González-López P, Nieto J, Lagares A, Paredes I. A Frontal Route to Middle and Posterior Cranial Fossa: Quantitative study for the lateral transorbital endoscopic approach and comparison with the subtemporal approach. World Neurosurg. 2022;167: e236-e250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.129
Fava A, di Russo P, Passeri T, Camara B, Paglia F, Matano F, Okano A, Giammattei L, Froelich S. The mini-combined transpetrosal approach: an anatomical study and comparison with the combined transpetrosal approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022;164(4):1079-1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05124-x
Agosti E, Turri-Zanoni M, Saraceno G, Belotti F, Karligkiotis A, Rocca G, Buffoli B, Raffetti E, Hirtler L, Rezzani R, Rodella LF, Ferrari M, Nicolai P, Bresson D, Herman P, Dallan I, Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F. Quantitative anatomic comparison of microsurgical transcranial, endoscopic endonasal, and transorbital approaches to the spheno-orbital region. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021;21(6):E494-E505. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab310
Serioli S, Agosti E, Buffoli B, Raffetti E, Alexander AY, Salgado-López L, Hirtler L, Rezzani R, Maroldi R, Draghi R, Borghesi I, Calbucci F, Peris-Celda M, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F. Microsurgical transcranial approaches to the posterior surface of petrosal portion of the temporal bone: quantitative analysis of surgical volumes and exposed areas. Neurosurg Rev. 2023;46(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-01956-y
Santos C, Guizzardi G, Di Somma A, Lopez P, Mato D, Enseñat J, Prats-Galino A. Comparison of accessibility to cavernous sinus areas throughout endonasal, transorbital, and transcranial approaches: anatomic study with quantitative analysis. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023;24(4):e271-e280. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000547
Sun Q, Zhao X, Gandhi S, Tayebi Meybodi A, Belykh E, Valli D, Cavallo C, Borba Moreira L, Nakaji P, Lawton MT, Preul MC. Quantitative analysis of ipsilateral and contralateral supracerebellar infratentorial and occipital transtentorial approaches to the cisternal pulvinar: laboratory anatomical investigation. J Neurosurg. 2019; 133(4): 1172-1181. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.4.JNS19351
Houlihan LM, Naughton D, Preul MC. Volume of surgical freedom: The most applicable anatomical measurement for surgical assessment and 3-dimensional modeling. Front Bioengineer Biotechnol. 2021;9;62879.
Otero-Fernández P, Abarca-Olivas J, González-López P, Martorell-Llobregat C, Flores-Justa A, Villena-Martín M, Nieto-Navarro J. Endoscopic approaches to the posterior wall of the third ventricle: An anatomical comparison. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024;245:108511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108511
Lan Q, Sughrue M, Hopf NJ, Mori K, Park J, Andrade-Barazarte H, Balamurugan M, Cenzato M, Broggi G, Kang D, Kikuta K, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Irie S, Li Y, Liew BS, Kato Y. International expert consensus statement about methods and indications for keyhole microneurosurgery from International Society on Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01188-z
Arnaout MM, Luzzi S, Galzio R, Aziz K. Supraorbital keyhole approach: pure endoscopic and endoscope-assisted perspective. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020;189:105623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105623
Rampinelli V, Agosti E, Saraceno G, Ferrari M, Taboni S, Mattavelli D, Schreiber A, Tomasoni M, Gualtieri T, Ravanelli M, Buffoli B, Rezzani R, Fontanella MM, Nicolai P, Piazza C, Deganello A, Doglietto F. Endoscopic subtemporal epidural key-hole approach: quantitative anatomic analysis of three surgical corridors. World Neurosurg. 2021;152: e128-e137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.055
Wu H, Maimaiti A, Xie Q, Aili Y, Muertizha M, Zhu G, Mijiti M, Li Y, Wang Y. Quantitative anatomical study of the supratentorial and infratentorial “endoscopic keyhole” approach to the peripineal region. Int J Clin Pract. 2024;6851468. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6851468
Revuelta Barbero JM, Porto E, Prevedello DM, Noiphithak R, Yanez-Siller JC, Martinez-Perez R, Pradilla G. Quantitative comparative analysis of the endoscope-assisted expanded retrosigmoid approach and the far-lateral approach to the inframeatal area: an anatomic study with surgical implications. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023;24(3):e187-e200. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000506
Lin BJ, Ju DT, Hsu TH, Chen YA, Chung TT, Liu WH, Hueng DY, Chen YH, Hsia CC, Ma HI, Liu MY, Tang CT. Quantitative comparison of endoscopically assisted endonasal, sublabial and transorbital transmaxillary approaches to the anterolateral skull base. Clin Otolaryngol. 202;46(1):123-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13559
Agosti E, Saraceno G, Rampinelli V, Raffetti E, Veiceschi P, Buffoli B, Rezzani R, Giorgianni A, Hirtler L, Alexander AY, Deganello A, Piazza C, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D, Peris-Celda M, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F. Quantitative anatomic comparison of endoscopic transnasal and microsurgical transcranial approaches to the anterior cranial fossa. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022;23(4):e256-e266. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000312
Zoia C, Mantovani G, Müther M, Suero Molina E, Scerrati A, De Bonis P, Cornelius JF, Roche PH, Tatagiba M, Jouanneau E, Manet R, Schroeder HWS, Cavallo LM, Kasper EM, Meling TR, Mazzatenta D, Daniel RT, Messerer M, Visocchi M, Froelich S, Bruneau M, Spena G. Through the orbit and beyond: current state and future perspectives in endoscopic orbital surgery on behalf of the EANS frontiers committee in orbital tumors and the EANS skull base section. Brain Spine. 2023; 3:102669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102669
de Notaris M, Sacco M, Corrivetti F, Grasso M, Corvino S, Piazza A, Kong DS, Iaconetta G. The transorbital approach, a game-changer in neurosurgery: a guide to safe and reliable surgery based on anatomical principles. J Clin Med. 2023;12(20):6484. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206484
Corvino S, Kassam A, Piazza A, Corrivetti F, Spiriev T, Colamaria A, Cirrottola G, Cavaliere C, Esposito F, Cavallo LM, Iaconetta G, de Notaris M. Open-door extended endoscopic transorbital technique to the paramedian anterior and middle cranial fossae: technical notes, anatomomorphometric quantitative analysis, and illustrative case. Neurosurg Focus. 2024;56(4):E7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.1.FOCUS23838
Komaitis S, Skandalakis GP, Drosos E, Neromyliotis E, Charalampopoulou E, Anastasopoulos L, Zenonos G, Stranjalis G, Kalyvas A, Koutsarnakis C. The lateral retrocanthal transorbital endoscopic approach to the middle fossa: cadaveric stepwise approach and review of quantitative cadaveric data. Neurosurg Focus. 2024;56(4):E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.1.FOCUS23839
Di Somma A, Andaluz N, Cavallo LM, Topczewski TE, Frio F, Gerardi RM, Pineda J, Solari D, Enseñat J, Prats-Galino A, Cappabianca P. Endoscopic transorbital route to the petrous apex: a feasibility anatomic study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160(4):707-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3448-x
Park HH, Roh TH, Choi S, Yoo J, Kim WH, Jung IH, Yun IS, Hong CK. Endoscopic transorbital approach to mesial temporal lobe for intra-axial lesions: cadaveric study and case series (SevEN-008). Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021;21(6):E506-E515. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab319
De Rosa A, Mosteiro A, Guizzardi G, Roldán P, Torales J, Matas Fassi J, Cavallo LM, Solari D, Prats-Galino A, Di Somma A, Enseñat J. Endoscopic transorbital resection of the temporal lobe: anatomic qualitative and quantitative study. Front Neuroanat. 2023;17:1282226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2023.1282226
Kim EH, Yoo J, Jung IH, Oh JW, Kim JS, Yoon JS, Moon JH, Kang SG, Chang JH, Roh TH. Endoscopic transorbital approach to the insular region: cadaveric feasibility study and clinical application (SevEN-005). J Neurosurg. 2021;135(4):1164-1172. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.8.JNS202255
Di Somma A, Kong DS, de Notaris M, Moe KS, Sánchez España JC, Schwartz TH, Enseñat J. Endoscopic transorbital surgery levels of difficulty. J Neurosurg. 2022;137(4):1187-1190. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.3.JNS212699
Evins AI, Sistiaga IL, Quispe-Flores AH, Castro MM, Atchley TJ, Pérez-Fernández S, Pomposo I, Stieg PE, Bernardo A. A quantitative comparative surgical analysis of the endoscopic transorbital approach and frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic approach for extradural exposure of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurg Focus. 2024;56(4):E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.1.FOCUS23860
Noiphithak R, Yanez-Siller JC, Revuelta Barbero JM, Cho RI, Otto BA, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM. Comparative analysis of the exposure and surgical freedom of the endoscopic extended minipterional craniotomy and the transorbital endoscopic approach to the anterior and middle cranial fossae. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019;17(2):174-181. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy309
Zoia C, Mastantuoni C, Solari D, de Notaris M, Corrivetti F, Spena G, Cavallo LM. Transorbital and supraorbital uniportal multicorridor approach to the orbit, anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossa: Anatomic study. Brain Spine. 2023;4:102719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102719
Houlihan LM, Loymak T, Abramov I, Jubran JH, Staudinger Knoll AJ, Howshar JT, O’Sullivan MGJ, Lawton MT, Preul MC. The biportal transorbital approach: quantitative comparison of the anterior subfrontal craniotomy, bilateral transorbital endoscopic, and microscopic approaches. J. Neurosurg. 2023;30;140(1):59-68. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.4.JNS221866
Topczewski TE, Di Somma A, Pineda J, Ferres A, Torales J, Reyes L, Morillas R, Solari D, Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Enseñat J, Prats-Galino A. Endoscopic endonasal and transorbital routes to the petrous apex: anatomic comparative study of two pathways. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(9):2097-2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04451-1
Wang Q, Xu X, Ouyang S, Chen J, Song Z, Lou J, Jiang S, Shi W. Exposure of the cavernous sinus via the endoscopic transorbital and endoscopic endonasal approaches: a comparative study. World Neurosurg. 2024;181:e1047-e1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.034
Agosti E, Turri-Zanoni M, Saraceno G, Belotti F, Karligkiotis A, Rocca G, Buffoli B, Raffetti E, Hirtler L, Rezzani R, Rodella LF, Ferrari M, Nicolai P, Bresson D, Herman P, Dallan I, Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F. Quantitative anatomic comparison of microsurgical transcranial, endoscopic endonasal, and transorbital approaches to the spheno-orbital region. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021;21(6):E494-E505. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab310
Guizzardi G, Prats-Galino A, Mosteiro A, Santos C, Topczewski T, Torales J, Roldan P, Reyes L, Di Somma A, Enseñat J. Multiportal combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital pathways: qualitative and quantitative anatomic studies of the “connection” skull base areas. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023;24(5):e342-e350. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000577
Konovalov A.N., Pilipenko Yu.V., Okishev D.N., Artemiev A.A., Mamedbekova G.Sh., Ivanov V.M., Smirnov A.Yu., Strelkov S.V., Blinova E.V., Eliava Sh.Sh. Augmented reality as a method of neuronavigation for extra-intracranial microanastomosis. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy (Pirogov scientific journal). 2024; 8(3):28-34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/operhirurg2024803128
Shell K, Holt E, Kington A, Mohammed K, Black A, Troup C, Ingiaimo M, Scoles K, Nathaniel TI. Motivation to learn neuroanatomy by cadaveric dissection is correlated with academic performance. Clin Anat. 2020;33(1):128-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23500
Fava A, Gorgoglione N, De Angelis M, Esposito V, di Russo P. Key role of microsurgical dissections on cadaveric specimens in neurosurgical training: Setting up a new research anatomical laboratory and defining neuroanatomical milestones. Front Surg. 2023;10:1145881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1145881
Ahumada-Vizcaino JC, Wuo-Silva R, Hernández MM, Chaddad-Neto F. The art of combining neuroanatomy and microsurgical skills in modern neurosurgery. Front Neurol. 2023;13:1076778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1076778
La Rocca G, Mazzucchi E, Pignotti F, Galieri G, Rinaldi P, Sabatino G. Advanced dissection lab for neuroanatomy training. Front Neuroanat. 2022;15:7 78122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2021.778122
Erol G, Güngör A, Sevgi UT, Gülsuna B, Doğruel Y, Emmez H, Türe U. Creation of a microsurgical neuroanatomy laboratory and virtual operating room: a preliminary study. Neurosurg Focus. 2024; 56(1):E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.10.FOCUS23638

Close metadata