The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kushnarev V.A.

N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Artemyeva E.S.

N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Kudaybergenova A.G.

N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg, Russia

The frequency of luminal A- and B-subtypes in ER-positive HER2-negative invasive breast carcinomas according to the data of digital image analysis of histological specimen

Authors:

Kushnarev V.A., Artemyeva E.S., Kudaybergenova A.G.

More about the authors

Journal: P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2019;8(3): 175‑179

Read: 5497 times


To cite this article:

Kushnarev VA, Artemyeva ES, Kudaybergenova AG. The frequency of luminal A- and B-subtypes in ER-positive HER2-negative invasive breast carcinomas according to the data of digital image analysis of histological specimen. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2019;8(3):175‑179. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog2019803115175

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Polley MY, Leung SC, McShane LM, Gao D, Hugh JC, Mastropasqua MG, Viale G, Zabaglo LA, Penault-Llorca F, Bartlett JM, Gown AM, Symmans WF, Piper T, Mehl E, Enos RA, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Nielsen TO. An international Ki-67 reproducibility study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(24):1897-1906. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt306
  2. Major MA. Clinical trials update: Medical management of advanced breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2003;26(6, Suppl.):10S-15S.
  3. Denkert C, von Minckwitz G. Reply to Ki-67 in breast cancer: a useful prognostic marker! Ann Oncol. 2014;25(2):542-543. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt564
  4. Gnant M, Harbeck N, Thomssen C. St. Gallen 2011: Summary of the Consensus Discussion. Breast Care(Basel). 2011;6(2):136-141. https://doi.org/10.1159/000328054
  5. Harbeck N, Thomssen C, Gnant M. St. Gallen 2013: brief preliminary summary of the consensus discussion. Breast Care (Basel). 2013;8(2):102-109. https://doi.org/10.1159/000351193
  6. Gnant M, Thomssen C, Harbeck N. St. Gallen/Vienna 2015: a brief summary of the consensus discussion. Breast Care(Basel). 2015;10(2):124-130. https://doi.org/10.1159/000430488
  7. Kurbel S, Dmitrović B, Marjanović K, Kristek B. Testing tumor type dependent relations between expression of ER and PgR with Ki-67 values in a single series of 1180 invasive ductal cancer patients. Period Biol. 2014;116(4):417-424.
  8. Zhong F, Bi R, Yu B, Yang F, Yang W, Shui R. A comparison of visual assessment and automated digital image analysis of Ki-67 labeling index in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0150505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150505
  9. Laurinavicius A, Plancoulaine B, Laurinaviciene A, Herlin P, Meskauskas R, Baltrusaityte I, Besusparis J, Dasevicius D, Elie N, Iqbal Y, Bor C. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki-67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(2):R35. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3639
  10. Bloom HJ, Richardson WW. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Br J Cancer. 1957;11(3):359-377.
  11. Plancoulaine B, Laurinaviciene A, Meskauskas R, Baltrusaityte I, Besusparis J, Herlin P, Laurinavicius A. Digital immunohistochemistry wizard: image analysis-assisted stereology tool to produce reference data set for calibration and quality control. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9(Suppl.1):S8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-9-S1-S8
  12. Kårsnäs A. Image analysis methods and tools for digital histopathology applications relevant to breast cancer diagnosis. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2014.
  13. Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ; Panel members. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2206-2223. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt303
  14. Besusparis J, Plancoulaine B, Rasmusson A, Augulis R, Green AR, Ellis IO, Laurinavicius A. Impact of tissue sampling on accuracy of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry evaluation in breast cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2016;11(1):82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-016-0525-z
  15. Mikami Y, Ueno T, Yoshimura K, Tsuda H, Kurosumi M, Masuda S, Horii R, Toi M, Sasano H. Interobserver concordance of Ki-67 labeling index in breast cancer: Japan Breast Cancer Research Group Ki-67 ring study. 2013. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:1539-1543. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12245
  16. Maisonneuve P, Disalvatore D, Rotmensz N, Curigliano G, Colleoni M, Dellapasqua S, Pruneri G, Mastropasqua MG, Luini A, Bassi F, Pagani G, Viale G, Goldhirsch A. Proposed new clinicopathological surrogate definitions of luminal A and luminal B (HER2-negative) intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(3):R65. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3679
  17. Ye J, Wang W, Xu L, Duan X, Cheng Y, Xin L, Zhang H, Zhang S, Li T, Liu Y. A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging system for luminal A breast cancer. Chin J Cancer Res. 2017;29(4):351-360. https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.04.08
  18. Li J, Chen Z, Su K, Zeng J. Clinicopathological classification and traditional prognostic indicators of breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(7):8500-8500.
  19. Puig-Vives M, Sánchez MJ, Sánchez-Cantalejo J, Torrella-Ramos A, Martos C, Ardanaz E, Chirlaque MD, Perucha J, Díaz JM, Mateos A, Machón M, Marcos-Gragera R. Distribution and prognosis of molecular breast cancer subtypes defined by immunohistochemical biomarkers in a Spanish population-based study. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(3):609-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.039
  20. Regan MM, Pagani O, Francis PA, Fleming GF, Walley BA, Kammler R, et al. Predictive value and clinical utility of centrally-assessed ER, PgR and Ki-67 to select adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer: TEXT and SOFT trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;154(2):275-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3612-z
  21. Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, Blair SL, Burstein HJ, Cyr A, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: breast cancer, version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2017;15(4):433-451. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2017.0044
  22. Kushnarev VA, Artemyeva ES, Kudaybergenova AG. Comparison of digital and visual methods for Ki-67 assessment in invasive breast carcinomas. 2018. Arkhiv patologii. 2018;80(2):38-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/patol201880238-42
  23. Stålhammar G, Fuentes Martinez N, Lippert M, Tobin N, Mølholm I, Kis L, Rosin G, Rantalainen M, Pedersen L, Bergh J, Grunkin M, Hartman J. Digital image analysis outperforms manual biomarker assessment in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2016;29(4):318-29. https://doi.org/1038/modpathol.2016.34
  24. Mu K, Li L, Yang Q, Yun H, Kharaziha P, Ye DW, Auer G, Lagercrantz SB, Zetterberg A. A standardized method for quantifying proliferation by Ki-67 and cyclin A immunohistochemistry in breast cancer. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2015;19(4):243-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.05.002

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.