The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Nechay T.V.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Sazhin A.V.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Loban K.M.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Bogomolova A.K.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Suglob V.V.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Beniia T.R.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Efficacy and safety of artificial intelligence-based large language models for decision making support in herniology: evaluation by experts and general surgeons

Authors:

Nechay T.V., Sazhin A.V., Loban K.M., Bogomolova A.K., Suglob V.V., Beniia T.R.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(8): 6‑14

Read: 1947 times


To cite this article:

Nechay TV, Sazhin AV, Loban KM, Bogomolova AK, Suglob VV, Beniia TR. Efficacy and safety of artificial intelligence-based large language models for decision making support in herniology: evaluation by experts and general surgeons. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(8):6‑14. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia20240816

Recommended articles:
Arti­ficial inte­lligence in ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodu­les. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12-2):109-116
Long-term outcomes of lapa­roscopic inguinal hernia repair. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12):67-73
Is arti­ficial inte­lligence nece­ssary for healthcare system?. Medi­cal Technologies. Asse­ssment and Choice. 2024;(4):40-48
Iatrogenic exte­rnal iliac artery injury following inguinal hernia repair. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;(6):695-698
Challenges, problems and approaches to healthcare digi­tal technologies enha­ncement. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2024;(12):31-36
Outcomes of using both self-gripping mesh and poly­propylene meshes fixed by tacks in Liechtenstein repair. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2024;(4-2):53-57

References:

  1. Jia Z, Chen J, Xu X, Kheir J, Hu J, Xiao H, Peng S, Hu XS, Chen D, Shi Y. The importance of resource awareness in artificial intelligence for healthcare. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2023;5(7):687-698.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00670-0
  2. Calaluce R, Davis JW, Bachman SL, Gubin MM, Brown JA, Magee JD, Loy TS, Ramshaw BJ, Atasoy U. Incisional hernia recurrence through genomic profiling: a pilot study. Hernia. 2013;17(2):193-202.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0923-4
  3. Venigalla A, Frankle J, Carbin M. BioMedLM: a Domain-Specific Large Language Model for Biomedical Text. 2022. Accessed June 15, 2023. https://www.mosaicml.com/blog/introducing-pubmed-gpt
  4. Singhal K, Azizi S, Tu T, Mahdavi SS, Wei J, Chung HW, Scales N, Tanwani A, Cole-Lewis H, Pfohl S, Payne P, Seneviratne M, Gamble P, Kelly C, Babiker A, Schärli N, Chowdhery A, Mansfield P, Demner-Fushman D, Agüera Y Arcas B, Webster D, Corrado GS, Matias Y, Chou K, Gottweis J, Tomasev N, Liu Y, Rajkomar A, Barral J, Semturs C, Karthikesalingam A, Natarajan V. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature. 2023;620(7972):172-180.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2
  5. Dave T, Athaluri SA, Singh S. ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. 2023;6:1169595. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1169595
  6. Homolak J. Opportunities and risks of ChatGPT in medicine, science, and academic publishing: a modern Promethean dilemma. Croatian Medical Journal. 2023;64(1):1-3.  https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2023.64.1
  7. Heath R. ChatGPT, in study, achieves a 72% success. Axios. August 29, 2023. Accessed September 12, 2023. https://www.axios.com/2023/08/29/chatgpt-medical-diagnosis-study
  8. Rao A, Pang M, Kim J, Kamineni M, Lie W, Prasad AK, Landman A, Dreyer K, Succi MD. Assessing the Utility of ChatGPT Throughout the Entire Clinical Workflow: Development and Usability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2023;25:e48659. https://doi.org/10.2196/48659
  9. Owusu T. Doctors should think twice about using ChatGPT for medical advice, here’s why. The Street. December 5, 2023. Accessed January 15, 2024. https://www.thestreet.com/technology/doctors-should-think-twice-about-using-chatgpt-for-medical-advice-heres-why
  10. Can doctors trust chatgpt? No, but they use it anyway. ICT&health. Published online August 7, 2023. Accessed August 24, 2023. https://ictandhealth.com/can-doctors-trust-chatgpt-no-but-they-use-it-anyway/news
  11. Taylor J. AMA calls for stronger AI regulations after doctors use ChatGPT to write medical notes. The Guardian. July 27, 2023. Accessed August 20, 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/27/chatgpt-health-industry-hospitals-ai-regulations-ama
  12. Mello MM, Guha N. ChatGPT and Physicians’ Malpractice Risk. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(5):e231938. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1938
  13. Hetrick C. Why doctors using ChatGPT are unknowingly violating HIPAA. USC Price School of Public Policy. July 7, 2023. Accessed August 27, 2023. https://priceschool.usc.edu/news/chatgpt-doctors-data-privacy-hipaa
  14. Omelyanovskiy VV, Gorkavenko FV, Ignatyeva NV, Mukhortova PA, Ryzhova OR, Teptsova TS, Kingshott AA, Kondratyeva BB. Real-world data: principles of use in decision making and in health technology assessment. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2023;16(2):283-290. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2023.167
  15. Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, Fabian M, Ferzli G, Fortelny R, Köckerling F, Kukleta J, LeBlanc K, Lomanto D, Misra M, Morales-Conde S, Ramshaw B, Reinpold W, Rim S, Rohr M, Schrittwieser R, Simon T, Smietanski M, Stechemesser B, Timoney M, Chowbey P. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)—Part 3. Surgical Endoscopy. 2014;28(2):380-404.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3172-4
  16. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13(4):343-403.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7
  17. Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, Fabian M, Ferzli GS, Fortelny RH, Köckerling F, Kukleta J, Leblanc K, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Bansal VK, Morales-Conde S, Ramshaw B, Reinpold W, Rim S, Rohr M, Schrittwieser R, Simon T, Smietanski M, Stechemesser B, Timoney M, Chowbey P; International Endohernia Society (IEHS). Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)—Part 1. Surgical Endoscopy. 2014;28(1):2-29.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6
  18. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, Dunlop DD, Reda DJ, McCarthy M Jr, Neumayer LA, Barkun JS, Hoehn JL, Murphy JT, Sarosi GA Jr, Syme WC, Thompson JS, Wang J, Jonasson O. Watchful Waiting vs Repair of Inguinal Hernia in Minimally Symptomatic Men. JAMA. 2006;295(3):285.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.3.285
  19. Köckerling F, Bittner R, Kuthe A, Hukauf M, Mayer F, Fortelny R, Schug-Pass C. TEP or TAPP for recurrent inguinal hernia repair—register-based comparison of the outcome. Surgical Endoscopy. 2017;31(10):3872-3882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5416-1
  20. De Angelis L, Baglivo F, Arzilli G, Privitera GP, Ferragina P, Tozzi AE, Rizzo C. ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11:1166120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166120
  21. Janssen BV, Kazemier G, Besselink MG. The use of ChatGPT and other large language models in surgical science. BJS Open. 2023;7(2):zrad032. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad032
  22. Samaan JS, Yeo YH, Rajeev N, Hawley L, Abel S, Ng WH, Srinivasan N, Park J, Burch M, Watson R, Liran O, Samakar K. Assessing the Accuracy of Responses by the Language Model ChatGPT to Questions Regarding Bariatric Surgery. Obesity Surgery. 2023;33(6):1790-1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06603-5
  23. Ayoub NF, Lee YJ, Grimm D, Balakrishnan K. Comparison Between ChatGPT and Google Search as Sources of Postoperative Patient Instructions. JAMA Otolaryngology — Head & Neck Surgery. 2023;149(6):556.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0704
  24. Ouyang L, Wu J, Jiang X, Almeida D, Wainwright CL, Mishkin P, Zhang C, Agarwal S, Slama K, Ray A, Schulman J, Hilton J, Kelton F, Miller L, Simens M, Askell A, Welinder P, Christiano P, Leike J, Lowe R. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Arxiv. March 4, 2022. Accessed August 11, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02155
  25. Haupt CE, Marks M. AI-Generated Medical Advice — GPT and Beyond. JAMA. 2023;329(16):1349. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.5321
  26. Jones E, Steinhardt J. Capturing Failures of Large Language Models via Human Cognitive Biases. Arxiv. February 24, 2022. Accessed August 18, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.12299
  27. Kirchner JH. Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models. On Brains, Minds, And Their Possible Uses. September 25, 2021. Accessed August 12, 2023. https://universalprior.substack.com/p/cognitive-biases-in-large-language?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.