OBJECTIVE

To determine the criteria for choosing a surgical approach and compare an effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEAE) via 3 approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 120 patients who underwent CEAE via 3 different approaches. Intraoperative skin marking included lower jaw angle, skin fold closest to common carotid artery bifurcation. Carotid artery bifurcation and borders of atherosclerotic plaque were visualized using ultrasound. An effectiveness of each access was evaluated in accordance with the following criteria: neurological complications, cosmetic effect and quality of life after 1 and 12 months. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group I — 80 patients with CEAE with access through the natural skin fold (NSF); group II — 40 patients with CEAE using the classical longitudinal access. The 1st group was divided into 2 subgroups. Subgroup I A — 39 patients with CEAE using mini-access via NSF; subgroup I B — 41 patients with CEAE using extended access via NSF.

RESULTS

There were no strokes and transient ischemic attacks in a month after surgery in both groups. After 12 months, stroke occurred in 2 (%) patients of group II, cranial neuropathy — 8 (21%) patients in the same group. The best cosmic effect was achieved in subgroup I A after 1 and 12 months (37.1±6.7 scores). Mean score of physical health was 51.59±5.9 scores in subgroup I A, 46.03±7.53 scores — in subgroup I B, 38.84±5.28 scores — in group II. Index of mental health was 49.63±6.69, 45.68±5.6, and 48.59±7.29 scores, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Considering these data, we developed a personalized computer program ensuring fast choice of optimal surgical approach.