The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.
Sazhin A.V.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Nechay T.V.
Department of general surgery and radiology, Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov, Moscow
Titkova S.M.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Tyagunov A.E.
Department of general surgery and radiology, Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov, Moscow
Anurov M.V.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Melnikov-Makarchuk K.Yu.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia;
City Clinical Hospital №29 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
Tyagunov A.A.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Ermakov I.V.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia;
City Clinical Hospital №29 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
Glagolev N.S.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia;
Bauman Municipal Clinical Hospital №29 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
Kurashinova L.S.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Ivanova E.A.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
Nechai V.S.
Tula Regional Clinical Hospital, Tula, Russia
Karpov A.V.
Moscow Clinical Hospital №4, Moscow, Russia
Mirzoian A.T.
Rossiĭskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ meditsinskiĭ universitet, Moskva
Ivakhov G.B.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University & ,V.S. Savel’ev University Faculty Clinic, Moscow, Russia
Balakirev Yu.S.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia;
City Clinical Hospital №1 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
Comparison of standard and fast track rehabilitation in patients with acute appendicitis. Intermediate results of multicenter prospective randomized trial
Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(9): 15‑23
Views: 769
Downloaded: 11
To cite this article:
Sazhin AV, Nechay TV, Titkova SM, et al. . Comparison of standard and fast track rehabilitation in patients with acute appendicitis. Intermediate results of multicenter prospective randomized trial. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery.
2018;(9):15‑23. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2018090115
Aim. To analyze outcomes of fast track rehabilitation in patients with acute appendicitis. Material and methods. Prospective, randomized multi-center trial including 86 patients was conducted. There were 38 patients in the main group and 48 in the control group. All patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy under endotracheal anesthesia. Protocol included informing, no premedication, glucose infusion prior to surgery, antibiotics administration, mesoappendix excision, limited deployment of drainage tubes, intraabdominal prolonged anesthesia, minimal pneumoperitoneum, limited irrigation, minimum power monopolar electrocautery, antiemetics, early activation and eating (2 and 6 hours after surgery). Pain was evaluated by visual-analogue scale. Auscultative peristalsis was considered every 2 hours after surgery. Cortisol level was assessed preoperatively, in 6 and 12—24 hours after surgery in 11 (29%) and 15 (31%) patients of the main and control groups respectively. Discharge criteria: no leukocytosis, fever and pain syndrome requiring anesthesia, no signs of complications and patient’s consent. Results. Terms of disease, gender, age and comorbidities were similar in all patients. Duration of surgery under minimal pneumoperitoneum and standard pressure was also similar: 69.2±3.98 and 70.9±3.89 min (p=0.762). Pain syndrome grade and need for analgesics were significantly lower in the main group within entire follow-up. Pain syndrome was absent at the 1st postoperative day in 16 (42%) and 2 (4.1%) patients of both groups, respectively (score 0—1). Phrenic nerve syndrome was observed in 36.8% of the main group and 60.4% of the control group (p=0.05). Incidence of dyspepsia and terms of peristalsis onset were similar. Length of hospital-stay was 1.45 days in the main group and 3.15 days in the control group (p=0.002). In the main group 18 (47%) patients were discharged on the first day after surgery. There were only 4 (8.3%) patients with similar hospital-stay in the control group (p<0.001). There were no repeated hospitalizations. Postoperative cortisol concentration was similar in both groups as well as in complicated and uneventful postoperative period. In the main group postoperative intestinal paresis (Clavien—Dindo grade 2) occurred in 1 patient. In the control group 7 patients had postoperative infiltrate and 1 patient — intestinal paresis (Clavien—Dindo grade 2). Postoperative drainage tube was deployed in 3 out of 7 patients with postoperative infiltrates and 6 of them received antibiotic therapy. Medication was successfully applied in all patients with complications. Conclusion. There are some advantages of FTR for AA including reduced pain syndrome, morbidity and less length of hospital-stay. Issue of cortisol concentration requires further trials.
Authors:
Sazhin A.V.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Nechay T.V.
Department of general surgery and radiology, Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov, Moscow
Titkova S.M.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Tyagunov A.E.
Department of general surgery and radiology, Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov, Moscow
Anurov M.V.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Melnikov-Makarchuk K.Yu.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia;
City Clinical Hospital №29 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
Tyagunov A.A.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Ermakov I.V.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia;
City Clinical Hospital №29 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
Glagolev N.S.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia;
Bauman Municipal Clinical Hospital №29 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
Kurashinova L.S.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Ivanova E.A.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
Nechai V.S.
Tula Regional Clinical Hospital, Tula, Russia
Karpov A.V.
Moscow Clinical Hospital №4, Moscow, Russia
Mirzoian A.T.
Rossiĭskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ meditsinskiĭ universitet, Moskva
Ivakhov G.B.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University & ,V.S. Savel’ev University Faculty Clinic, Moscow, Russia
Balakirev Yu.S.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia;
City Clinical Hospital №1 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
List of references:
Close metadata
Email Confirmation
An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.
Email Confirmation
Log in to the site using your account in one of the services
We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.