The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Sinkov M.A.

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Kochergin N.A.

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Arnt A.A.

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Isakov L.K.

Kemerovo State Medical University

Sinkova M.N.

Kemerovo State Medical University

Ganyukov V.I.

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Results of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with coronary artery disease and previous coronary artery bypass grafting

Authors:

Sinkov M.A., Kochergin N.A., Arnt A.A., Isakov L.K., Sinkova M.N., Ganyukov V.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021;14(4): 237‑242

DOI: 10.17116/kardio202114041237

Read: 1567 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

RESULTS OF PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND PREVIOUS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING
RESULTS OF PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND PREVIOUS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING

To cite this article:

Sinkov MA, Kochergin NA, Arnt AA, Isakov LK, Sinkova MN, Ganyukov VI. Results of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with coronary artery disease and previous coronary artery bypass grafting. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021;14(4):237‑242. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio202114041237

 
 
ЭндоКард
Подписка 2026 Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия (Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Stentectomy following percutaneous coro­nary inte­rvention complicated by perforation of distal anastomosis after previous coro­nary artery bypass grafting. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(1):109-114
Strain echo­cardiography for perioperative asse­ssment of the left ventricle and left atrium in patients unde­rgoing coro­nary artery bypass surgery. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(3):269-279
Reha­bilitation pote­ntial of patients with ischemic heart disease who unde­rwent auto­venous coro­nary artery bypass surgery in the evaluation of reha­bilitation treatment effe­ctiveness. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(5):29-39
Endo­vascular correction of lesions of coro­nary arte­ries and coro­nary artery bypass grafts in patients with coro­nary artery disease with recu­rrent ischemia after surgical myocardial reva­scularization. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2024;(4):34-40
Quality of life within 6 months after coro­nary artery bypass grafting. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2025;(3):62-71
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

To study the results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and venous coronary artery bypass graft dysfunction after previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis included 87 patients with coronary artery disease who underwent PCI for venous coronary artery bypass graft dysfunction and chronic coronary artery occlusion. PCI for coronary artery bypass graft dysfunction was performed in 63 patients, recanalization of coronary artery occlusion — in 24 patients.

RESULTS

Analysis of early (within 30 days) results showed that both groups were comparable by primary endpoint rate (mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeated revascularization of the target coronary artery) and incidence of combined endpoint (overall number of adverse cardiovascular events). Analysis of long-term outcomes (within 36 months) showed that patients after PCI for coronary artery bypass graft dysfunction were characterized by higher incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (42.9 vs 18.2%, p=0.028) including nonfatal myocardial infarction (33.9 vs 9.1%, p=0.028) compared to PCI for coronary artery occlusion.

CONCLUSION

PCI for coronary artery bypass graft dysfunction is characterized by higher incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in long-term period compared to PCI for coronary artery occlusion.

Keywords:

CABG
PCI for coronary artery bypass graft dysfunction
recanalization of coronary artery occlusion
repeated myocardial revascularization

Authors:

Sinkov M.A.

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Kochergin N.A.

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Arnt A.A.

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Isakov L.K.

Kemerovo State Medical University

Sinkova M.N.

Kemerovo State Medical University

Ganyukov V.I.

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Received:

06.11.2020

Accepted:

10.12.2020

Close metadata

References:

  1. Sinkov MA, Kochergin NA, Ganyukov VI. In-hospital outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome according to clinical practice. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2019;8:1:23-29. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2019-8-1-23-29
  2. Chen L, Theroux P, Lesperance J, et al. Angiographic features of vein grafts versus ungrafted coronary arteries in patients with unstable angina and previous bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1493-1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00344-0
  3. Bourassa MG, Enjalbert M, Campeau L, et al. Progression of atherosclerosis in coronary arteries and bypass grafts: ten years later. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:102-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(84)90759-8
  4. Hwang MH, Meadows WR, Palac RT, et al. Progression of native coronary artery disease at 10 years: insights from a randomized study of medical versus surgical therapy for angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:1066-1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90533-u
  5. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:616-626.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(96)00206-9
  6. Barner HB, Bailey M, Guthrie TJ, et al. Radial artery free and T graft patency as coronary artery bypass conduit over a 15-year period. Circulation. 2012;126:140-144.  https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.081497
  7. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2019;40:87-165.  https://doi.org/10.1714/3203.31801
  8. Windecker S, Neumann FJ, Juni P, et al. Considerations for the choice between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention as revascularization strategies in major categories of patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease: an accompanying article of the task force of the 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:204-212.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy532
  9. de Jaegere PP, van Domburg RT, Feyter PJ, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:89-96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(96)00104-0
  10. Keeley EC, Velez CA, O’Neill WW, Saan RD, et al. Long-term clinical outcome and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after percuta-neous interventions on saphenous vein grafts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:659-665.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01420-6
  11. Coolong A, Baim DS, Kuntz RE et al. Saphenous vein graft stenting and major adverse cardiac events: a predictive model derived from a pooled analysis of 3958 patients. Circulation. 2008;117:790-797.  https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.651232
  12. Brilakis ES, O’Donnell CI, Penny W et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in native coronary arteries versus bypass grafts in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: insights from the veterans affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking program. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:884-893.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.034
  13. Brilakis ES, Rao SV, Banerjee S, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a report from the national cardiovascular data registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:844-850.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.018
  14. De Feyter PJ. Percutaneous treatment of saphenous vein bypass graft obstructions: a continuing obstinate problem. Circulation. 2003;107:2284-2286. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000069360.38675.22
  15. Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, et al. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2011;4:213-221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.024
  16. Teramoto T, Tsuchikane E, Matsuo H, et al. Occlusion in native coronary artery in decreased in patients who underwent previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JACC Cardiovascular interventions. 2014;7(1):39-46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.012
  17. Tejada JG, Velazquez M, Hernandez F, et al. Percutaneous revascularization in patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Immediate and 1-year clinical outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2009;134:201-206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.01.042
  18. Bundhoo SS, Kalla M, Anantharaman R, et al. Outcomes following PCI in patients with previous CABG: a multi centre experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78:169-176.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22841
  19. Mathew V, Berger PB, Lennon RJ, Gersh BJ, Holmes Jr DR. Comparison of percutaneous interventions for unstable angina pectoris in patients with and without previous coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:931-937.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01125-5
  20. Galassi AR, Tomasello SD, Reifart N, et al. In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion: insights from the ERCTO (European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion) registry. EuroIntervention. 2011;7:472-479.  https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv7i4a77
  21. Kimura M, Katoh O, Tsuchikane E, et al. The efficacy of a bilateral approach for treating lesions with chronic total occlusions the CART (controlled antegrade and retrograde subintimal tracking) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2009;2:1135-1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2009.09.008
  22. Vermeersch P, Agostoni P, Verheye S, et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implan-tation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2423-2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.021
  23. Brilakis ES, Lichtenwalter C, de Lemos JA et al. A randomized controlled trial of a paclitaxel-eluting stent versus a similar bare-metal stent in saphenous vein graft lesions the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:919-928.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.029
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.