The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Gabuzov G.G.

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Savrasov G.V.

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Saakova A.L.

Tsentrsoyuz Hospital of the Russian Federation

The place of the robot in operative gynecology

Authors:

Gabuzov G.G., Savrasov G.V., Saakova A.L.

More about the authors

Journal: Endoscopic Surgery. 2021;27(6): 56‑63

DOI: 10.17116/endoskop20212706156

Read: 1777 times

Contact the author
Table of contents

THE PLACE OF THE ROBOT IN OPERATIVE GYNECOLOGY
THE PLACE OF THE ROBOT IN OPERATIVE GYNECOLOGY

To cite this article:

Gabuzov GG, Savrasov GV, Saakova AL. The place of the robot in operative gynecology. Endoscopic Surgery. 2021;27(6):56‑63. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop20212706156

Подписка 2026 Эндоскопическая хирургия (Endoscopic Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Lapa­roscopic access in the treatment of diseases of the reproductive system in patients with morbid obesity. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(4):102-109
In-hospital resu­lts of robot-assisted aorto-iliac reco­nstructions for occlusive lesions. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2026;(1):7-14
Atypical loca­tion of uterine fibroids: a view of an unusual clinical case through the lens of diagnostics and surgery. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2026;(1):86-91
Cata­mnesis of patients who unde­rwent surgical treatment of placental regrowth in the Russian Fede­ration (pilot multicenter study). Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2026;(2):5-19
Anaphylactic shock in obstetrics (an obse­rvation from practice with a brief lite­rature review). Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2026;(2):64-72
Abstract:

The main advantages of robotic-assisted surgery over traditional methods of performing surgical interventions from the point of view of the patient, the surgeon and his adaptive responses, the clinic and the state are considered. The literature data on the number of surgical robotic systems used in the world, on the number of operations performed with their help, features of the development of robotic-assisted surgery in Russia, forecasts of the development of the surgical robotics market are presented. A brief overview of three surgical robotic systems available in the global medical device market is presented: da Vinci Si, Senhance, Versius. Their main functional advantages for minimally invasive operations, including gynecological ones, are described. A brief review of the published results of the successful use of the listed surgical robotic systems in the operative gynecological practice of clinics around the world is presented.

Keywords:

endosurgery
robot-assisted operation
surgical robotics
operative gynecology
hysterectomy

Authors:

Gabuzov G.G.

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Savrasov G.V.

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Saakova A.L.

Tsentrsoyuz Hospital of the Russian Federation

Received:

07.06.2021

Accepted:

29.09.2021

Close metadata

References:

  1. Popov AA, Atroshenko KV, Manannikova TN, Fedorov AA, Koval AA, Tyurina SS, Ashurova GZ, Zingan SI. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya Sankt-Peterburga. 2017;2:65-69. (In Russ.).
  2. Sheptunov S.A., Vasiliev A.O., Kolontarev K.B., Nakhushev R.S., Pushkar D.Yu. Robotic surgery — digital technology that saves lives. Zdorov’e megapolisa. 2020;1(1):60-71. (In Russ.).
  3. Powell F, Khaund A. Laparoscopy and laparoscopic surgery. Obstet, Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2016;26:297-303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2016.07.004
  4. Lawrie TA, Liu H, Lu D, Dowswell T, Song H, Wang L, Shi G. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011422.pub2
  5. Lee J, Asher V, Nair A, White V, Brocklehurst C, Traves M, Bali A. Comparing the experience of enhanced recovery programme for gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open gynaecological surgery: a prospective study. Perioperative Med. 2018;7:15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0096-5
  6. Claerhout F, Verguts J, Werbrouck E, Veldman J, Lewi P, Deprest J. Analysis of the learning process for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: identification of challenging steps. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1185-1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2412-z
  7. Gueli Alletti S, Perrone E, Cianci S, Rossitto C, Monterossi G, Bernardini F, Scambia G. 3 mm Senhance robotic hysterectomy: a step towards future perspectives. J Robotic Surg. 2018;12:575-577.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0778-5
  8. Savalgi R, Ellis G. Clinical anatomy for surgeons performing laparoscopic and thoracoscopic operations. M.: Meditsna; 2016. (In Russ.).
  9. Bouquet de Joliniere J, Librino A, Dubuisson J-B, Khomsi F, Ben Ali N, Fadhlaoui A, Ayoubi J M, Feki A. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Frontiers in Surgery 3: eCollection 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00026
  10. Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G. Comparison of roboticassisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS: J Society Laparoendoscop Surg. 2012;16:542.  https://doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13462882736899
  11. Corrado G, Mereu L, Bogliolo S, Cela V, Gardella B, Sperduti I, Certilli C, Pellegrini A, Posar G, Zampa A, Tateo S, Gadducci A, Spinillo A, Vizza E. Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy in obese patients with endometrial cancer: an Italian multi-institutional study. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS: 2019;e2066. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2066
  12. Buderath P, Aktas B, Heubner M, Kimmig R. Robot-assisted hysterectomy: a critical evaluation. Robot Surg Res Rev. 2015;2:51-58.  https://doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S50267
  13. Pushkar DYu, Govorov AV, Kolontarev KB. Robot-assisted surgery. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2019;89(5):466-469. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869-5873895466-469
  14. Vasilyev AO, Govorov AV, Kolontarev KB, Sukhikh SO, Okishev AV, Kim YuA, Shiryaev AA, Vishnevskaya YuG, Pushkar DYu. Modern robotic technologies in the treatment of urological diseases. Meditsinskii alfavit. 2017;3(33):25-28. (In Russ.).
  15. Istre O. Minimally invasive gynecological surgery. Springer; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0691-z
  16. Schuessler Z, Schuessler H, Strohaber J. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy in a community hospital after seven years of experience. Laparosc, Endosc Robotic Surg. 2018;1(2):42-45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2018.07.001
  17. Berelavichus SV, Kriger AG, Titova NL, Smirnov AV, Polyakov IS, Kaldarov AR, Son AI. Cost of robot-assisted and laparoscopic operations. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2015;4:31-34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2015431-34
  18. Rebeles SA, Muntz HG, Wieneke-Broghammer C, Vason ES, McGonigle KF. Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women. J Robotic Surg. 2009;3:141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-009-0149-3
  19. Da Vinci sets new standards for surgical precision [Electronic resource]. Date of access: 25.02.21.  https://elvation.de/en/da-vinci-systeme/
  20. Da Vinci robot in Russia. Da Vinci in figures. Date of access: 25.02.21. (In Russ.). https://robot-davinci.ru/zapisi/robot-da-vinchi-v-rossii
  21. Popov AA, Atroshenko KV, Slobodyanuyk BA, Ashurova GZ, Zingan SI. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik. 2016;1:116-120. (In Russ.).
  22. Stephan D, Salzer H, Willeke F. First Experiences with the New Senhance Telerobotic System in Visceral Surgery. Visceral Med. 2018;34(1):31-36.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000486111
  23. Cianci S, Rossitto C, Perrone E, Alletti SG. Senhance robotic platform for ovarian borderline tumor treatment: minimally invasive robotic approach for conservative adnexal surgery. Gynecol Pelvic Med. 2020;3:27.  https://doi.org/10.21037/gpm-20-27
  24. Fanfani F, Monterossi G, Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Gueli Alletti S, Costantini B, Gallotta V, Selvaggi L, Restaino S, Scambia G. The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):215-221.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4187-9
  25. Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S, Perrone E, Pizzacalla S, Monterossi G, Vizzielli G, Gidaro S, Scambia G. The Senhance™ surgical robotic system («Senhance») for total hysterectomy in obese patients: a pilot study. J Robot Surg. 2018;12:229-234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0718-9
  26. Rossitto C, Gueli Alletti S, Perrone E, Monterossi G, Scambia G: Treatment of gynecological disease in obese patients: with role for telelap ALF-X platform? J Robot Surg. 2017;11:95-96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0594-8
  27. CMR Surgical rolls out modular surgery robot to NHS hospitals [Electronic resource]. Date of access: 25.02.21.  https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/cmr-surgical-rolls-out-modular-surgery-robot-to-nhs-hospitals
  28. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1105-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8
  29. Sedrakyan A, Campbell B, Merino JG, Kuntz R, Hirst A, McCulloch P. IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices. BMJ. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2372
  30. Carey M, Bali A, Pandeva I, Pradhan A, Slack M. Preclinical evaluation of a new robot-assisted surgical system for use in gynecology minimal access surgery. Gynecol Surg. 2020;17:2.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-020-01069-0
  31. Kelkar D, Borse MA, Godbole GP, Kurlekar U, Dinneen E, Stevens L, Slack M. First-in-human clinical trial of a new robot-assisted surgical system for total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(3):800-801.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.083
  32. Kelkar D, Borse MA, Godbole GP, Kurlekar U, Slack M. Interim safety analysis of the first-in-human clinical trial of the Versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery. Surg Endosc. 2020:5193-5202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08014-4
  33. Prodromidou A, Spartalis E, Tsourouflis G, Dimitroulis D, Nikiteas N. Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2020;679-686.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01042-1
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.