The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

M.M. Vysotskiĭ

Kafedra akusherstva i ginekologii lechebnogo fakul'teta Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo mediko-stomatologicheskogo universiteta

E.O. Sazonova

Kafedra éndoskopicheskoĭ khirurgii FPDO MGMSU

Iu.Iu. Domokeeva

Kafedra éndoskopicheskoĭ khirurgii fakul'teta poslediplomnogo obrazovaniia MGMSU, Moskva

Comparative analysis of efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and Prolift surgery

Authors:

M.M. Vysotskiĭ, E.O. Sazonova, Iu.Iu. Domokeeva

More about the authors

Journal: Endoscopic Surgery. 2012;18(1): 12‑15

Views: 496

Downloaded: 10

To cite this article:

Vysotskiĭ MM, Sazonova EO, Domokeeva IuIu. Comparative analysis of efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and Prolift surgery. Endoscopic Surgery. 2012;18(1):12‑15. (In Russ.)

Recommended articles:
Pregnancy after lapa­roscopic sacrohysteropexy. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2023;(3):70-73
Pelvic organ prolapse in young women. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2023;(6-2):142-148
Reha­bilitation programs for women after vagi­nal plastic surgery with native tissues (educational and methodological manual). Rege­nerative Biotechnologies, Preventive, Digi­tal and Predictive Medi­cine. 2024;(1):45-54
Lapa­roscopic methods of treatment of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(3):55-59

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation



We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.