ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроектыО насРекламаДоставка/ОплатаКонтакты
+7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Главная
  • / Журналы
  • / Вернуться в журнал
  • / Содержание номера
  • / Статья
Assessment of patient and neurosurgeon radiation exposure using a direct-reading dosimeter during transpedicular fixation for thoracic and lumbar spine injuries

Assessment of patient and neurosurgeon radiation exposure using a direct-reading dosimeter during transpedicular fixation for thoracic and lumbar spine injuries

Authors:
Антон Юрьевич Кордонский,
Павел Борисович Попов,
Леонид Исаакович Бескин,
Александр Вадимович Тупикин,
Василий Амиранович Каранадзе,
Евгений Михайлович Иванов,
Ринат Ирфанович Абдрафиев,
Артем Николаевич Бородин,
Рашид Саидович Саидов,
Андрей Анатольевич Гринь

Журнал: Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н.Н. Бурденко. 2026;90(3):49-57.

DOI: 10.17116/neiro20269003149

Read: 1471 раз

Download PDF (RU)Download PDF (EN)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Individual dosimetry is routinely performed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Total dose is accumulated in these devices and periodically recorded by an accredited laboratory. This method does not provide real-time information on intraoperative radiation exposure.

OBJECTIVE

To compare X-ray doses received by patients with traumatic thoracic and/or lumbar spine injury during open and minimally invasive interventions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients underwent surgery for thoracic and/or lumbar spine injury. Intraoperative analysis included dose-area products (DAP, cGy×cm2), individual TLD dosimeter readings of surgeons. Individual radiation dose equivalent was determined using four direct-reading dosimeters positioned on the operating table at distances of 0, 40, 80, and 120 cm from direct beam of radiation source.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients underwent open surgery, 38 – transcutaneous procedure. Mean DAP was 2171 cGy×cm2, mean radiation dose equivalent — 1.6 mSv. Minimally invasive procedures were associated with significantly higher radiation exposure: median DAP 3408.8 cGy×cm2 and dose equivalent 2.3 mSv compared to 327.8 cGy×cm2 and 0.2 mSv for open surgeries. Neurosurgeon radiation exposure did not exceed standards.

CONCLUSION

Patient radiation exposure is significantly higher during minimally invasive procedures compared to open surgeries (mean dose equivalent 3 mSv versus 0.6 mSv). Understanding the patterns of radiation field is necessary for informed and safe use of X-rays.

Keywords

  • thoracic and lumbar spine fractures
  • transpedicular fixation
  • radiation dose
  • radiation dose equivalent

Дата поступления: 14.04.2025

Дата принятия в печать: 12.03.2026

Дата публикации: 25.05.2026

References
  1. Barrios A, Vega N, Martínez J, Padua C, Mendivelso F, Orejuela D. Cumulative Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Among Surgeons During Intraoperative Cholangiography. World Journal of Surgery. 2020;44(1):63-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05170-0
  2. Hu Y, Ma M, Yin H, Ren P, Tian X, Zheng Z, Zhong Z, Wang Z, Yang Z, Chen H. Assessment of cumulative cancer risk attributable to diagnostic X-ray radiation: a large cohort study. European Radiology. 2023;33(3):1769-1778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09178-4
  3. Raza M, Houston J, Geleit R, Williams R, Trompeter A. The use of ionising radiation in orthopaedic surgery: principles, regulations and managing risk to surgeons and patients. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. 2021;31(5):947-955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02955-9
  4. Grin’ AA, Bogdanova OYu, Kaykov AK, Kordonskiy AYu. Surgical treatment of patients with multiple vertebral-spinal trauma at thoracic and lumbar levels (literature review). Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2018;20(1):64-75. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2018-20-1-64-75
  5. Kazakova EYu, Grin’ AA. Features of diagnostics and surgical treatment of spine and spinal cord injuries of patients affected by catatrauma (literature review). Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2018;20(1):76-85. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2018-20-1-76-85
  6. Bos D, Guberina N, Zensen S, Opitz M, Forsting M, Wetter A. Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2023;120(9):135-141. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0395
  7. Hurley RJ, McCabe FJ, Turley L, Maguire D, Lucey J, Hurson CJ. Whole-body radiation exposure in Trauma and Orthopaedic surgery. Bone & Joint Open. 2022;3(11):907-912. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.311.BJO-2022-0062.R1
  8. Kim HJ, Park ES, Lee SH, Park CH, Chung SW. Reduction of Radiation Exposure by Modifying Imaging Manner and Fluoroscopic Settings during Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2021;64(6):933-943. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0338
  9. Klingler JH, Scholz C, Krüger MT, Naseri Y, Volz F, Hohenhaus M, Brönner J, Hoedlmoser H, Sircar R, Hubbe U. Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional Fluoroscopy and 3D Fluoroscopy-based Navigation. Spine. 2021;46(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003685
  10. Arif S, Brady Z, Enchev Y, Peev N, Encheva E. Minimising radiation exposure to the surgeon in minimally invasive spine surgeries: A systematic review of 15 studies. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2021;107(7):102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102795
  11. Raffetto ML, Blum LE, Abbenhaus EJ, Hautala GS, Lemieux B, Pease T, Wright RD, Moghadamian ES, Aneja A, Blair JA, Matuszewski PE. Radiation Exposure Among Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons: Deconstructing Commonly Held Myths and Misperceptions. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2022;36(8):375. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002340
  12. Xu X, Xie Y, Li H, Wang X, Shi S, Yang Z, Lan Y, Han J, Liu Y. Awareness and preparedness level of medical workers for radiation and nuclear emergency response. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024;12:1410722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1410722
slide-cover

Recommended articles:

Contents.Non Nocere. New Therapeutic Journal. 2026;(10):4-5

Editor's Letter.Non Nocere. New Therapeutic Journal. 2026;(10):1-1

Academician Andrei Dmitrievich Kaprin is 60 years old.P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2026;15(5):97-97

Diagnostic value of biomarkers in the detection of preclinical cervical neoplasia.P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2026;15(5):92-96

Fluorescence imaging in pancreatic cancer surgery. (A systematic review).P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2026;15(5):87-91

Adrenal cysts clinically mimicking cancer (three clinical observations and literature review).P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2026;15(5):82-86

Well-differentiated liposarcoma of the pancreas: morphological features and surgical management in an elderly female patient.P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2026;15(5):77-81

Synchronous gastrointestinal stromal tumor and locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma achieving complete pathomorphological response after neoadjuvant therapy.P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2026;15(5):73-76

A software calculator for assessing cardiovascular risk in breast cancer radiation therapy: development and validation.P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2026;15(5):67-72

Minimally invasive simultaneous operations on the lungs and abdominal organs for secondary tumor lesions.P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2026;15(5):60-66

Издательство «Медиа Сфера»
РекламаДоставка/ОплатаО насКонтактыОбучение для редакцийПолитика конфиденциальностиПолитика обработки персональных данныхПубличная оферта на реализацию издательской продукции
ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроекты
  • RuStore

© 1998-2026

  • Телефоны издательства:

  • +7 (495) 482-41-18
  • +7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Прямой телефон отдела подписки
    (только по вопросам заказов и доставки журналов)

  • +7 (800) 250-18-12
  • пн-пт с 10:00 до 18:00

  • Telegram
  • VK
info@mediasphera.ru
  • Почтовый адрес:

  • Издательство «Медиа Сфера»,
    а/я 54, Москва, Россия, 127238

  • RuStore

© 1998-2026