The orbitozygomatic approach (OZA) has been used in neurosurgical practice since the 1980s. Many approach modifications have been proposed; anatomical and clinical developments have been conducted in many clinics. However, there is no algorithm for choosing an approach option, depending on the type and topographo-anatomical features of pathology. Material and methods. We searched for publications in the PubMed and Medscape databases using the keywords «orbitozygomatic». Results. A total of 447 publications matching the search terms were found. In most of them, the approach was either not actually orbitozygomatic or was mentioned in the description of a clinical case. One hundred and nineteen full text Russian or English papers were available for detailed analysis. Of these, we selected 72 most relevant publications. Discussion. There were no studies demonstrating disadvantages of the OZA compared to traditional craniotomies. Orbitozygomatic approaches are widely used in routine neurosurgical practice. Existing approaches are not without disadvantages. The publications are based on small material. The recommendations on choosing the optimal OZA option are based on the authors’ opinion, i.e. they satisfy the minimum level of evidence. There are no studies comparing the efficacy of OZA options in different types and topographo-anatomical variants of neurosurgical pathology of the anterior and middle skull base. Conclusion. The reasonability of using the orbitozygomatic approach in neurosurgical practice is obvious. There are a large number of orbitozygomatic approaches and their modifications. The modern literature lacks an algorithm for choosing the optimal OZA option for specific types and topographo-anatomical variants of the pathological process.