The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Byval'tsev V.A.

otdel neĭrokhirurgii i ortopedii Nauchnogo tsentra rekonstruktivnoĭ i vosstanovitel'noĭ khirurgii Sibirskogo otdeleniia RAMN;
NUZ Dorozhnaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa OAO "RZhD", Irkutsk

Kalinin A.A.

NUZ Dorozhnaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa OAO "RZhD", Irkutsk

Stepanov I.A.

Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia

Pestryakov Yu.Ya.

Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Krasnoyarsk, Russia

Shepelev V.V.

Department of hospital surgery with course of neurosurgery Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia

Analysis of the results of total cervical disc arthroplasty using a M6-C prosthesis: a multicenter study

Authors:

Byval'tsev V.A., Kalinin A.A., Stepanov I.A., Pestryakov Yu.Ya., Shepelev V.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;81(5): 46‑55

DOI: 10.17116/neiro201781546-55

Read: 3511 times

Download PDF (RU)
Download PDF
Contact the author
Table of contents

ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF TOTAL CERVICAL DISC ARTHROPLASTY USING A M6-C PROSTHESIS: A MULTICENTER STUDY
ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF TOTAL CERVICAL DISC ARTHROPLASTY USING A M6-C PROSTHESIS: A MULTICENTER STUDY

To cite this article:

Byval'tsev VA, Kalinin AA, Stepanov IA, Pestryakov YuYa, Shepelev VV. Analysis of the results of total cervical disc arthroplasty using a M6-C prosthesis: a multicenter study. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;81(5):46‑55. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro201781546-55

Подписка 2025 Журнал «Вопросы нейрохирургии» имени Н.Н. Бурденко (Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Neurological complications invo­lving the cervical spine as a cause of adve­rse outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(6):133-140
A clinical case of upper airway obstruction, dysphagia caused by diffuse idiopathic skeletal hype­rostosis. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2025;(4):115-118
Systemic glucocorticosteroids for dege­nerative back pain: effi­cacy in radi­culopathy and musculoskeletal pain syndrome. Russian Journal of Pain. 2025;(4):54-59
Abstract:

Cervical spondylosis and intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration are the most common cause for compression of the spinal cord and/or its roots. Total IVD arthroplasty, as a modern alternative to surgical treatment of IVD degeneration, is gaining popularity in many neurosurgical clinics around the world. Aim — the study aim was to conduct a multicenter analysis of cervical spine arthroplasty with an IVD prosthesis M6-C («Spinal Kinetics», USA). Material and methods. The study included 112 patients (77 males and 35 females). All patients underwent single-level discectomy with implantation of the artificial IVD prosthesis M6-C. The follow-up period was up to 36 months. Dynamic assessment of the prosthesis was based on clinical parameters (pain intensity in the cervical spine and upper extremities (visual analog scale — VAS); quality of life (Neck Disability Index — NDI); and subjective satisfaction with the results of surgical treatment (Macnab scale) and instrumental data (range of motion in the operated spinal motion segment, degree of heterotopic ossification (McAfee-Suchomel classification), and time course of degenerative changes in the adjacent segments).

Keywords:

cervical spine
intervertebral disc degeneration
spondylosis
dynamic fixation
total arthroplasty
intervertebral disc prosthesis M6-C

Authors:

Byval'tsev V.A.

otdel neĭrokhirurgii i ortopedii Nauchnogo tsentra rekonstruktivnoĭ i vosstanovitel'noĭ khirurgii Sibirskogo otdeleniia RAMN;
NUZ Dorozhnaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa OAO "RZhD", Irkutsk

Kalinin A.A.

NUZ Dorozhnaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa OAO "RZhD", Irkutsk

Stepanov I.A.

Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia

Pestryakov Yu.Ya.

Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Krasnoyarsk, Russia

Shepelev V.V.

Department of hospital surgery with course of neurosurgery Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia

Close metadata

References:

  1. Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Orthopedics. 2011;34:889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.10.033
  2. Fraser JF, Härtl R. Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:298-303. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.298
  3. Upadhyaya CD, Wu JC, Trost G, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Tay B, et al. Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16:216-228. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.6.spine10623
  4. Phillips FM, Lee JY, Geisler FH, Cappuccino A, Chaput CD, DeVine JG, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine. 2013;38:E907-E918. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318296232f
  5. Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Anderson PA, Fessler RG, Hacker RJ, et al. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine. 2009;34:101-107. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31818ee263
  6. Li J, Liang L, Ye XF, Qi M, Chen HJ, Yuan W. Cervical arthroplasty with Discover prosthesis: clinical outcomes and analysis of factors that may influence postoperative range of motion. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:2303-2309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2897-z
  7. Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:308-318. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.spine09513
  8. Pfirrmann C, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine. 2001;26(17):1873-1878. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011
  9. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, Tanaka N, Jeon CH, Andersson GB, Haughton VM. The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine. 2000;25(23):3036-3044. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012010-00011
  10. Byvaltsev VA, Sorokovikov VA, Kalinin AA, Belykh EG. Analysis of anterior cervical interbody fusion using plate cage PCB Evoution for a two year period. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2013;1:37-45. (In Russ.)
  11. Lauryssen C, Coric D, Dimmig T, Musante D, Ohnmeiss DD, Stubbs HA. Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: Results from a prospective food and drug administration — regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up. International Journal of Spine Surgery. 2012;6:71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.001
  12. Gulsen S. The effect of the PEEK cage on the cervical lordosis in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;3(2):215-223. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2015.034
  13. Cincu R, Lorente F de A, Gomez J, Eiras J, Agrawal A. Long-term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: a comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2014;9(4):213-217. https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.146608
  14. Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3:417-423.
  15. Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Nian H, Harrell FE. Cervical disc arthroplasty with prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: seven-year outcomes. International Journal of Spine Surgery. 2016;10:24. https://doi.org/10.14444/3024
  16. Chang H-K, Huang W-C, Wu J-C, et al. Cervical arthroplasty for traumatic disc herniation: an age- and sex-matched comparison with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2015;16:228. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0692-1
  17. Cappelletto B, Giorgiutti F, Veltri C, Trevigne MA, Facchin P, Del Fabro P. Disc prosthesis replacement and interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease: comparative analysis of 176 consecutive cases. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:894-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3023-y
  18. Jadik S, Miller F, Pietila A. Cervical arthroplasty with the M6-C artificial disc in degenerative disease of the cervical spine. Arch Med. 2015;13(5):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0035-108529.
  19. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6(3):198-209. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198
  20. Chen L, Nie L, Zhang L, Hou Y. Fusion versus discover cervical disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1347-1351.
  21. Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Hoffman GA, Bae HW, Gaede SE, et al. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(5):532-545. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.6.SPINE12527
  22. Suchomel P, Byvaltsev VA. Analysis of the results of the use of artificial ProDisc-C cervical disc arthroplasty for the 2-year period in 54 patients. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2008;3:20-25. (In Russ.)
  23. Obernauer J, Landscheidt J, Hartmann S, Schubert GA, Thomé C, Lumenta C. Cervical arthroplasty with ROTAIO cervical disc prosthesis: first clinical and radiographic outcome analysis in a multicenter prospective trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016;17:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0880-7
  24. Tu TH, Wu JC, Huang WC, Wu CL, Ko CC, Cheng H. The effects of carpentry on heterotopic ossification and mobility in cervical arthroplasty: determination by computed tomography with a minimum 2-year follow-up: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(6):601-609. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.3.SPINE11436
  25. Levi B, Jayakumar P, Giladi A, et al. Risk factors for the development of heterotopic ossification in seriously burned adults: a NIDRR burn model system database analysis. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2015;79(5):870-876. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000838
  26. Medici D, Olsen BR. The role of endothelial-mesenchymal transition in heterotopic ossification. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2012;27(8):1619-1622. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1691
  27. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. European Spine Journal. 2002;12):131-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0428-4
  28. Sola RB, Murrey D, Janssen ME, et al. Results at 24 months from the prospective, randomized, multicenter investigational device exemption trial of ProDisc-C versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with 4-year follow-up and continued access patients. SAS J. 2010;4:122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.09.001
  29. Khalil C, Hancart C, Le Thuc V, Chantelot C, Chechin D, Cotton A. Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2013;18(10):2283-2291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0971-4
  30. Byvaltsev VA, Stepanov IA, Kalinin AA, Belykh EG. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of intervertebral disc degeneration in the lumbosacral spine. Vestnik Rentgenologii i Radiologii (Russian Journal of Radiology). 2016;97(6):357-364. (In Russ.)
  31. Shen S, Wang H, Zhang J, Wang F, Liu S-R. Diffusion weighted imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and T2* mapping of lumbar intervertebral disc in young healthy adults. Iranian Journal of Radiology. 2016;13(1):e30069. https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.30069
  32. Zuo J, Joseph GB, Li X, et al. In-vivo intervertebral disc characterization using magnetic resonance spectroscopy and T1ρ imaging: association with discography and oswestry disability index and SF-36. Spine. 2012;37(3):214-221. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182294a63
  33. Goffin M, Markwalder T-M. Bryan total disc arthroplasty: a replacement disc for cervical disc disease. Medical Devices (Auckland, NZ). 2010;3:11-24.
  34. Beaurain J, Bernard P, Dufour T, et al. Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up. European Spine Journal. 2009;18(6):841-850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1017-6
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.