Comparative analysis of evaluating criteria for lumbar discectomy success rate

The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Search result: 0

Bikmullin V.N.

Gorodskaia mnogoprofil'naia bol'nitsa #2, Sankt-Peterburg

Klitsenko O.A.

Kafedra pedagogiki, filosofii i prava Sankt-Peterburgskoĭ meditsinskoĭ akademii poslediplomnogo obrazovaniia

Shulev Iu.A.

Gorodskaia mnogoprofil'naia bol'nitsa #2, Sankt-Peterburg;
Kafedra neĭrokhirurgii Sankt-Peterburgskoĭ gosudarstvennoĭ akademii im. I.I. Mechnikova

Comparative analysis of evaluating criteria for lumbar discectomy success rate

Authors:

Bikmullin V.N., Klitsenko O.A., Shulev Iu.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2012;76(6): 28‑35

Read: 813 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Bikmullin VN, Klitsenko OA, Shulev IuA. Comparative analysis of evaluating criteria for lumbar discectomy success rate. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2012;76(6):28‑35. (In Russ.)

Подписка 2025-2 (Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Mediasphera_Net

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Rehabilitation of patients after spinal surgery: effectiveness of nonthermal techniques of peloidotherapy. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(4):23-29

Effectiveness of spinal traction in degenerative spine diseases. (A literature review). Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(4):60-69

Sanogenetic mechanisms of cyclic local traction therapy in the treatment of neurological manifestations of degenerative diseases in the spine. (Literature review). Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(5):74-83

Biodegradable devices for annulus fibrosus defect closure after lumbar discectomy. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12-2):95-100

Purpose. The study was conducted to analyze different criteria for lumbar discectomy success rate. Material and methods. 493 patients were evaluated by five-component visual-analogue pain scale, Oswestry index, ability to perform normal daily activity and work, satisfaction with surgery results and Watkins scale. Results. Good and excellent results of surgery correspond with good functional outcome. Generally, values reflecting good outcome could also be used as successful surgery criteria, although 10 to 20% of those patients still have pain complaints and/or are not satisfied with their postoperative functional and economic status. Conclusion. None of the abovementioned criteria has proved to be absolute prognostic factor. Combination of different predictive values might be useful in lumbar disc surgery outcome anticipation.

Keywords:

degenerative disc disease

functional outcome

microdiscectomy

good outcome.

Authors:

Bikmullin V.N.

Gorodskaia mnogoprofil'naia bol'nitsa #2, Sankt-Peterburg

Klitsenko O.A.

Kafedra pedagogiki, filosofii i prava Sankt-Peterburgskoĭ meditsinskoĭ akademii poslediplomnogo obrazovaniia

Shulev Iu.A.

Gorodskaia mnogoprofil'naia bol'nitsa #2, Sankt-Peterburg;
Kafedra neĭrokhirurgii Sankt-Peterburgskoĭ gosudarstvennoĭ akademii im. I.I. Mechnikova

List of references:

Mixter W.J., Barr J.S. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 1934; 211: 210-215.
Caspar W. A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Adv Neurosurg 1977; 74-77.
Yasargil M.G. Microsurgical operation of herniated lumbar disc. Adv Neurosurg 1977; 81-81.
Williams R.W. Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc. Spine 1978; 3: 175-182.
Tikhodeev S.A. Miniinvazivnaya khirurgiya gryzh mezhpozvonkovykh diskov poyasnichnogo otdela pozvonochnika. Ros neirokhirur zhurn 1999; 3: 239-240 (spets. vypusk).
Striffeler H., Groger U., Reulen H.J. "Standat" Microsurgical Lumbar Discectomy vs. "Conservative" Microsurgical Discectomy. Preliminary Study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991; 112: 62-64.
Pappas C.T., Harrington T., Sonntag V.K. Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 1992; 30: 6: 862-866.
Javid M.J., Hadar E.J. Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 1998; 89: 1-7.
Quigley M.R., Bost J., Maroon J.C., Elrifai A., Panahandeh M. Outcome after microdiscectomy: results of a prospective single institutional study. Surg Neurol 1998; 49: 3: 263-267; discussion 267-268.
Acsh H.L., Lewis P.J., Moreland D.B. et al. Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75-80% success rates be norm? J Neurosurg (Spine) 2002; 96: 1: 34-44.
Schoeggl A., Reddy M., Matula C. Functional and economic outcome following microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation in 672 patients. J Spinal Dis Tech 2003; 16: 2: 150-155.
Findlay G.F., Hall B.I., Musa B.S. et al. A 10-Year Follow-Up of the Outcome of Lumbar Microdiscectomy. Spine 1998; 23: Issue 10: 1168-1171.
Huang T.J., Hsu R.W., Li Y.Y., Cheng C.C. Less systemic cytokine response in patients following microendoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy. J Orthop Res 2005; 23: 2: 406-411.
Jensdottir M., Gudmundsson K., Hannesson B., Gudmundsson G. 20 years follow-up after the first microsurgical lumbar discectomies in Iceland. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2007; 149: 1: 51-58.
Bakhsh A. Long-term outcome of lumbar disc surgery: an experience from Pakistan Journal of Neurosurgery (Spine) 2010; 12: 6: 666-670.
Bikmullin V.N., Klitsenko O.A., Shulev Yu.A. i dr. Pyatisostavnaya vizual'no- analogovaya shkala otsenki bolevogo statusa pri retrospektivnom analize iskhodov khirurgicheskogo lecheniya degenerativnykh zabolevanii pozvonochnika. Zhurn vopr neirokhirur 2011; 4: 61-69.
Fairbank J.C., Couper J., Davies J.B. et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 271-273.
Watkins R.G., O'Brien J.P., Draugelis R. et al. Comparasion of Preoperative and Postoperative MMPI Data in Chronic Back Patients. Spine 1986; 11: 4: 385-390.
Prolo D.J., Oklund S.A., Butcher M. Toward uniformity in evaluation results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 1986; 6: 601-606.
Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Guillemin F. et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 24: 3186-3191.
Howe J., Frymoyer J.W. The effects of questionnaire design on the determination of end results in lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985; 10: 9: 804-805

Close metadata

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Registration

Last Name

Name

Middle Name

E-mail

Phone

Address

Country

Zip

City

Region

Street

Home

Apartmen

Legal entity name

ИНН

КПП

Password

Password

Repeat password

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.