Water aerobics training: selection and control of the exercise intensity using the Borg scale

Persiyanova-Dubrova A.L.; Marphina T.V.; Badalov N.G.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort20219802139

Persiyanova-Dubrova A.L.

National Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Marphina T.V.

Center of Medical Prevention of Department of Health of Moscow

Badalov N.G.

L.I. Shvetsova Scientific and Practical Center for Medical and Social Rehabilitation;
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Water aerobics training: selection and control of the exercise intensity using the Borg scale

Authors:

Persiyanova-Dubrova A.L., Marphina T.V., Badalov N.G.

More about the authors

Journal: Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2021;98(2): 39‑44

DOI: 10.17116/kurort20219802139

Read: 2491 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Persiyanova-Dubrova AL, Marphina TV, Badalov NG. Water aerobics training: selection and control of the exercise intensity using the Borg scale. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2021;98(2):39‑44. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort20219802139

Подписка 2026 Вопросы курортологии, физиотерапии и лечебной физической культуры (Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the opportunity of Borg scale using for applying and monitoring the aerobic training intensity in the pool as well as the relationship between the Borg scale and the heart rate (HR) in the aquatic environment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study involved 11 healthy individuals (mean age 46.4±7.5 years). After a cardiopulmonary test on a treadmill and a probation lesson the training was conducted in the pool using a set of basic aerobic exercises lasting 45 minutes. During training the subjects had to maintain a load level corresponding to 12—14 points on the Borg scale. Every 10 minutes of the main training part the heart rate was calculated and the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was determined according to the Borg scale.

RESULTS

The average heart rate in the main part of the training was 126.8±14.0 beats/min. The intensity of aerobic exercise was 82% of the maximum heart rate determined during the cardiopulmonary test and 68% of the reserve heart rate which corresponded to a high level of intensity. Between the heart rate and the Borg scale a significant correlation was found in the first period of training (r=0.67, p<0.02). At RPE 12—13 in almost ¹/₂ cases the subjects felt a subjectively lower intensity of the load than they actually performed (by heart rate) while at RPE 14 a high percentage of coincidences was observed between different measurement methods (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

During water aerobics training the use of the Borg scale to prescribe and maintain a level of exercise allows to achieve a sufficient intensity level which is necessary to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and physical performance in order to influence risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The Borg Scale as a stand-alone method of controlling intensity when using water-based aerobic training, especially with high-intensity training should be used with caution. Further investigation is needed to determine the relation between subjective measures of exercise intensity and HR and validity of their use during water aerobics training.

Keywords:

aerobic training

exercise in water

exercise intensity

heart rate

Borg scale

Authors:

Persiyanova-Dubrova A.L.

National Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Marphina T.V.

Center of Medical Prevention of Department of Health of Moscow

Badalov N.G.

L.I. Shvetsova Scientific and Practical Center for Medical and Social Rehabilitation;
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Received:

24.06.2020

Accepted:

03.11.2020

Close metadata

References:

Vuori I, Andersen L, Cavill N, Breda J, Whiting J, Mendes S, Logstrup S, Kestens M. Physical Activity Policies for Cardiovascular Health. Brussels; European Heart Network; 2019. Accessed January 23, 2021. https://www.ehnheart.org/publications-and-papers/publications/1243:physical-activity-policies-for-cardiovascular-health.html#:~:text=The%20recommendation%20is%20for%20regular,activity%20or%20an%20equivalent%20combination
Global action plan on physical activity 2018—2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
Bubnova MG, Aronov DM, Boytsov SA. Methodic recommendations. Maintaining physical activity of those with limitations in health. Edited by Boytsov S.A. Cardio Somatics. 2016;7(1):5-50. (In Russ.).
Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Accessed January 23, 2021. (In Russ.). https://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789244599976_rus.pdf
Bruce BE, Cole AJ. Comprehensive Aquatic Therapy. 3rd Edition. Pullman: Washington State University Publishing; 2011.
Pescatello LS. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Woltzers Kluwer/Lippincott, Williams&Wilkins; 2014.
Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 1982;14(5):377-381.
Haile L, Gallagher MJr, Robertson RJ. Perceived exertion laboratory manual: From standard practice to contemporary application. NY, New York: Springer Science ± Business Media; 2015.
Scherr J, Wolfarth B, Christle JW, Pressler A, Wagenpfeil S, Halle M. Associations between Borg’s rating of perceived exertion and physiological measures of exercise intensity. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113(1):147-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2421-x
Sage M, Middleton LE, Tang A, Sibley KM, Brooks D, McIlroy W. Validity of rating of perceived exertion ranges in individuals in the subacute stage of stroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(6):519-527. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr2006-519
Coquart J-B, Tourny-Chollet C, Lemaître F, Lemaire C, Grosbois J-M, Garcin M. Relevance of the measure of perceived exertion for the rehabilitation of obese patients. Review Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;55(9-10):623-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2012.07.003
Soriano-Maldonado A, Ruiz JR, Álvarez-Gallardo IC, Segura-Jiménez V, Santalla A, Munguía-Izquierdo D. Validity and reliability of rating perceived exertion in women with fibromyalgia: exertion-pain discrimination. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(14):1515-1522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.994661
Tang LH, Zwisler AD, Berg SK, Doherty P, Taylor R, Langberg H. Is the cardiovascular response equivalent between a supervised center-based setting and a self-care home-based setting when rating of perceived exertion is used to guide aerobic exercise intensity during a cardiac rehabilitation program? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(6):381-387. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000628
Parfitt G, Evans H, Eston R. Perceptually regulated training at RPE 13 is pleasant and improves physical health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(8):1613-1618. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31824d266e
Aronov DM, Lupanov VP. Funkcional’nye proby v kardiologii. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2007. (In Russ.).
Aquatic Exercise Association. Aquatic fitness professional manual. Aquatic exercises association. — 6th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2010.
Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, Cooney M-T, Corrà U, Cosyns B, Deaton C, Graham I, Hall MS, Hobbs FDR, Løchen M-L, Löllgen H, Marques-Vidal P, Perk J, Prescott E, Redon J, Richter DJ, Sattar N, Smulders Y, Tiberi M, van der Worp HB, van Dis I, Verschuren WMM. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Atherosclerosis. 2016;252:207-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.05.037
Cancela Carral JM, Ayán Pérez C. Effects of high-intensity combined training on women over 65. Gerontology. 2007;53:340-346. https://doi.org/10.1159/000104098
Quinn TJ, Sedory DR, Fisher BS. Physiological effects of deep water running following a land-based training program. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994;65:386-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1994.10607646
Alberton CL, Antunes AH, Pinto SS, Tartaruga MP, Silva EM, Cadore EL, Kruel LF. Correlation between rating of perceived exertion and physiological variables during the execution of stationary running in water at different cadences. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:155-162. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bde2b5
Pinto SS, Alberton CL, Zaffari P, Cadore EL, Kanitz AC, Liedtke GV, Tartaruga MP, Martins LF. Rating of perceived exertion and physiological responses in water-based exercise. J Hum Kinet. 2015;49:99-108. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0112
Shono T, Fujishima K, Hotta N, Ogaki T, Ueda T, Otoki K, Teramoto K, Shimizu T. Physiological responses and RPE during underwater treadmill walking in women of middle and advanced age. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2000;19(4):195-200.
David GB, Andrade LS, Schaun GZ, Alberton CL. HR, VO₂, and RPE relationships in an aquatic incremental maximum test performed by young women. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(10):2852-2858. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001719
Ozkan A, Kin-Isler A. The reliability and validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion in step dance sessions. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(1):296-300. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200702000-00052
Muyor JM, López-Miñarrro PA. Overall ratings of perceived exertion and heart rate during indoor cycling session in non-expert subjects. Med dello Sport. 2012;65:145-154.
Muyor JM. Exercise intensity and validity of the ratings of perceived exertion (borg and omni scales) in an indoor cycling session. J Hum Kinet. 2013;39:93-101. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0072
Chen MJ, Fan X, Moe ST. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2002;20(11):873-899. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404102320761787