The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Avetisov S.E.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Disease;
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Shitikova A.V.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Avetisov K.S.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Disease

Anatomical, morphological and biomechanical aspects of accommodation

Authors:

Avetisov S.E., Shitikova A.V., Avetisov K.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2022;138(4): 117‑125

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2022138041117

Views: 1651

Downloaded: 97

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

ANATOMICAL, MORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOMECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ACCOMMODATION
ANATOMICAL, MORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOMECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ACCOMMODATION

To cite this article:

Avetisov SE, Shitikova AV, Avetisov KS. Anatomical, morphological and biomechanical aspects of accommodation. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2022;138(4):117‑125. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2022138041117

Подписка 2025-2 (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Comparative evaluation of transscleral laser expo­sure in anatomical expe­riment. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(3):19-26
Comparative asse­ssment of the state of the cornea after YAG-laser inte­rventions on ante­rior segment stru­ctures. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(4):17-25

The article reviews the findings on the anatomy, morphological and biomechanical features of the accommodation apparatus. Modern methods of imaging and biometry confirm the validity of the Helmholtz lenticular theory of accommodation, according to which its mechanism involves three main components: the ciliary body, the zonular fibres and the lens capsule, the lens itself. Based on this, there is certain interest in studying the degree of participation of each of these components in the development of age-related changes in accommodation (presbyopia).

Keywords:

accommodation
ciliary body
crystalline lens
zonular fibres
lens capsule

Authors:

Avetisov S.E.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Disease;
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Shitikova A.V.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Avetisov K.S.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Disease

Received:

03.02.2022

Accepted:

23.02.2022

List of references:

  1. De Jong PTVM. The quest for the human ocular accommodation mechanism. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(1):98-104.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14194
  2. Helmholtz H. Ueber die Accommodation des Auges. Arch Ophthalmol. 1855;1:1-74. 
  3. Glasser A, Kaufman P. The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(5):863-872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00502-3
  4. Browm N. The change in shape and internal form of the lens of the eye on accommodation. Exp Eye Res. 1973;15(4):441-459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4835(73)90136-x
  5. Fincham E. The mechanism of accommodation. Monograph supplement. Brit J Ophthalmol. 1937;21(8).
  6. Koretz J, Cook C, Kaufman P. Aging of the human lens: changes in lens shape upon accommodation and with accommodative loss. J Opt Soc Am. 2002;19(1):144-151.  https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.19.000144
  7. Schachar R, Black T, Kash R, Cudmore D, Schanzlin D. The mechanism of accommodation and presbyopia in the primate. Ann Ophthalmol. 1995; 27:58-67. 
  8. Schachar R. The mechanism of accommodation and presbyopia. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2006;46(3):39-61.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004397-200604630-00006
  9. Schachar R, Schachar I. Intralenticular Hydrostatic Pressure Increases During Ciliary Muscle Contraction: A Finding Consistent With the Schachar Mechanism of Accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(6):34.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.6.34
  10. Iomdina EN, Poloz MV. Biomechanical model of the human eye as a basis for studying its accommodation ability. Rossijskij zhurnal biomekhaniki. 2010;14(3):7-18. (In Russ.).
  11. Svetlova OV, Koshits IN. Classification and interaction of accommodation mechanisms of the human eye. In: Biomechanics of the eye — 2002: Collection of scientific papers of the III seminar. M.: MNII GB im. Gelmgoltsa. 2002:117-119. (In Russ.).
  12. Tarutta EP, Iomdina EN, Tarasova NA, Khodzhabekyan NV. On the contribution of cornea into accommodation of the myopic eye. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2010;126(6):15-18. (In Russ.).
  13. Martinez-Enriquez E, Pérez-Merino P, Velasco-Ocana M, Marcos S. OCT-based full crystalline lens shape change during accommodation in vivo. Biomed Opt Exp. 2017;8(2):918-933.  https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.000918
  14. Monsalvez-Romin D, Moulakaki A, Esteve-Toboada J, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montes-Micp R. In vivo OCT assessment of anterior segment central axial lengths with accommodation. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2017;80(6):364-368.  https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20170089
  15. Sun Y, Fan S, Zheng H, Dai C, Ren Q, Zhou C. Noninvasive imaging and measurement of accommodation using dual-channel SD-OCT. Curr Eye Res. 2014;39(6):611-619.  https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2013.860991
  16. Tsorbatzoglou A, Nemeth G, Szell N, Biro Z, Brta A. Anterior segment changes with age and during accommodation measured with partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(9):1597-601.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.021
  17. Farouk M, Naito T, Shinomiya K, Eguchi H, Sayed K, Nagasawa T, Katome T, Mitamura Y. Optical Coherence Tomography Reveals New Insights into the Accommodation Mechanism. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:510459. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/510459
  18. Dubbelman M, Van der Heijde G, Weeber H. Change in shape of the aging human crystalline lens with accommodation. Vision Res. 2005;45(1):117-132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.032
  19. Koretz J, Cook C, Kaufman P. Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye. Changes in the anterior segment and crystalline lens with focus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(3):569-578. 
  20. Kasthurirangan S, Markwell E, Atchison D, Pope J. MRI study of the changes in crystalline lens shape with accommodation and aging in humans. J Vis Exp. 2011;11(3):19.  https://doi.org/10.1167/11.3.19
  21. Koretz J, Bertasso A, Neider M, True-Gabelt B, Kaufman P. Slit-lamp studies of the rhesus monkey eye: II. Changes in crystalline lens shape, thickness and position during accommodation and aging. Exp Eye Res. 1987;45(2):317-326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-4835(87)80153-7
  22. Hermans E, Dubbleman M, van der Heijde R, Heethaar R. The shape of the human lens nucleus with accommodation. J Vis Res. 2007;7(10):16, 1-10.  https://doi.org/10.1167/7.10.16
  23. Khan A, Pope J, Verkicharla P, Suheimat M, Atchison D. Change in human lens dimensions, lens refractive index distribution and ciliary body ring diameter with accommodation. Biomed Opt Express. 2018;9(3):1272-1282. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.001272
  24. Zheng S-L, Zhang A, Shi J-J, Zhou Y-X. Magnetic resonance imaging study of effects of accommodation on human lens morphological characters. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013;93(41):3280-3283.
  25. Choh V, Sivak J, Irving E, Wong W. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the anterior segment of the enucleated chicken eye during accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22(5):401-408.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00058.x
  26. Ostrin L, Glasser A. Comparisons between Pharmacologically and Edinger-Westphal-Stimulated Accommodation in Rhesus Monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(2):609-617.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0990
  27. Abramson D, Coleman D, Forbes M, Franzen L. Pilocarpine. Effect on the anterior chamber and lens thickness. Arch Ophthalmol. 1972;87(6):615-620.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1972.01000020617001
  28. Reilly M. A quantitative geometric mechanics lens model: insights into the mechanisms of accommodation and presbyopia. Vision Res. 2014;103:20-31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.001
  29. Iomdina EN, Bauer SM, Kotlyar KE. Biomechanics of the eye: theoretical aspects and clinical applications. Neroev VV, ed. M.: Real Time; 2015. (In Russ.).
  30. Goldberg D. Computer-animated model of accommodation and theory of reciprocal zonular action. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1559-1566. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S25983
  31. Bassnett S. Zinn’s zonule. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;82:100902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100902
  32. Wullink B, Pas H, Van der Worp R, Schol M, Janssen S, Kuijer R, Los L. Type VII Collagen in the Human Accommodation System: Expression in Ciliary Body, Zonules, and Lens Capsule. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018; 59(2):1075-1083. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23425
  33. Hiraoka M, Inoue K-I, Ohtaka-Maruyama C, Ohsako S, Kojima N, Senoo H, Takada M. Intracapsular organization of ciliary zonules in monkey eyes. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2010;293(10):1797-1804. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.21220
  34. Hiraoka M, Inoue K, Senoo H, Takada M. Morphological Study of the Accommodative Apparatus in the Monkey Eye. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2015; 298(3):630-636.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.2310
  35. De Maria A, Wilmarth PA, David LL, Bassnett S. Proteomic Analysis of the Bovine and Human Ciliary Zonule. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(1):573-585.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-20866
  36. Standring S, Borley N, Collins P, et al. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. Elsevier; 2009: Chapter 40. 
  37. Accommodation. A guide for physicians. Katargina LA, ed. M.: Aprel; 2012:136. (In Russ.).
  38. Chin N, Ishikawa S, Lappin H, Davidowitz J, Breinin G. Accommodation in monkeys induced by midbrain stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol. 1968;7(4): 386-396. 
  39. Gillmartin B. A review of the role of sympathetic innervation of the ciliary muscle in ocular accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1986;6(1):23-37. 
  40. Ostrin L, Glasser A. Autonomic Drugs and the Accommodative System in Rhesus Monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2010;90(1):104-112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2009.09.015
  41. Jampel R, Mindel J. The nucleus for accommodation in the midbrain of the macaque. Invest Ophthalmol. 1967;6(1):40-50. 
  42. Vilupuru A, Glasser A. Dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Vision Res. 2002;42(1):125-141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00260-7
  43. Westheimer G, Plair S. The parasympathetic pathways to internal eye muscles. Invest Ophthalmol. 1973;12(3):193-197. 
  44. Ripps H, Breinin G, Baum J. Accommodation in the cat. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1961;59:176-193. 
  45. Tabernero J, Chirre E, Hervella L, Prieto P, Artal P. The accommodative ciliary muscle function is preserved in older humans. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):25551. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25551
  46. Monsalvez-Romin D, Dominguez-Vicent A, Esteve-Taboada J, Montes-Mico R, Ferrer-Blasco T. Multisectorial changes in the ciliary muscle during accommodation measured with high-resolution optical coherence tomography. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2019;82(3):207-213.  https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20190041
  47. Dominguez-Vincent A, Monsalvez-Romin D, Esteve-Toboada J, Montes-Mico R, Ferrer-Blasco T. Effect of age in the ciliary muscle during accommodation: Sectorial analysis. J Optom. 2019;12(1):14-21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.01.001
  48. Sheppard A, Davies L. The effect of ageing on in vivo human ciliary muscle morphology and contractility. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1809-1816. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6447
  49. Strenk S, Strenk L, Guo S. Magnetic resonance imaging of aging, accommodating, phakic, and pseudophakic ciliary muscle diameters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(11):1792-1798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.05.031
  50. Wang K, Pierscionek B. Biomechanics of the human lens and accommodative system: Functional relevance to physiological states. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;71:114-131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.11.004
  51. Marussich L, Manns F, Nankivik D, Heilman B, Yao Y, Arrieta-Quintero E, Ho A, Augusteyn R, Parel J-M. Measurement of Crystalline Lens Volume During Accommodation in a Lens Stretcher. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(8):4239-4248. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17050
  52. Weeber H, van der Heijde R. Internal deformation of the human crystalline lens during accommodation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86(6):642-647.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01116.x
  53. Augusteyn R. Growth of the human eye lens. Mol Vis. 2007;13:252-257. 
  54. Kumar B, Chandler H, Plageman T, Reilly M. Lens stretching modulates Lens Epithelial Cell Proliferation via YAP Regulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(12):3920-3929. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.19-26893
  55. Iomdina EN, Poloz MV. Biomechanical modeling of age-related changes of human eye accommodation. Vestnik SPbGU. 2011;1(2):127-132. (In Russ.).
  56. Finchman E. The accommodation reflex and its stimulus. Br J Ophthalmol. 1951;35(7):381-393.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.35.7.381
  57. Glasser A, Campbell M. Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia. Vis Res. 1999;39(11):1991-2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00283-1
  58. Krag S, Andreassen T. Biomechanical measurements of the porcine lens capsule. Exp Eye Res. 1996;62(3):253-260.  https://doi.org/10.1006/exer.1996.0030
  59. Fisher R. The elastic constants of the human lens. J Physiol. 1971;212(1):147-180.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009315
  60. Ziebarth N, Borja D, Arrieta E, Aly M, Manns F, Dortonne I, Nankivil D, Jain R, Parel J-M. Role of the lens capsule in the mechanical accommodative response in a lens stretcher. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(10):4490-4496. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1647
  61. Avetisov KS, Bakhchieva NA, Avetisov SE, Novikov IA, Golovchenko AV, Shitikova AV. Atomic force microscopy in the study of anterior eye segment structures. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(1):103-110. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2020136011103
  62. Talu S, Sueiras V, Moy V, Ziebarth N. Micromorphology analysis of the anterior human lens capsule. Mol Vis. 2018;24:902-912. 
  63. Ziebarth N, Arrieta E, Feuer W, Manns F, Moy V, Parel J-M. Primate lens capsule elasticity assessed atomic force microscopy. Exp Eye Res. 2011;92:490-494.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2011.03.008
  64. Tsaousis K, Karagiannidis P, Kopsachilis N, Simeonidis C, Tsinopoulos I, Karagkiozaki V, Lamprogiannis L, Logothetidis S. Measurements of elastic modulus for human anterior lens capsule with atomic force microscopy: The effect of loading force. Int Ophthalmol. 2014;32:519-523.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-013-9846-z
  65. Avetisov KS, Bakhchieva NA, Avetisov SE, Novikov IA, Shitikova AV, Frolova AA, Timashev PS. Assessment of age-related changes in lens capsule biomechanics using atomic force microscopy. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(1):28-34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202113701128
  66. Halfter W, Moes S, Halfter K, Schoenenberger M, Monnier C, Kalita J, Asgeirsson D, Binggeli T, Jenoe P, Scholl H, Henrich P. The human Descemet’s membrane and lens capsule: Protein composition and biomechanical properties. Exp Eye Res. 2020;201:108326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2020.108326
  67. Avetisov K, Bakhchieva N, Avetisov S, Novikov I, Frolova A, Akovantseva A, Efremov Yu, Kotova S, Timashev P. Miomechanical properties of the lens capsule: A review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;103:103600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103600
  68. Michael R, Mikielewicz M, Gordillo C, Montenegro G, Cortes L, Barraquer R. Elastic properties of human lens zonules as a function of age in presbyopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(10):6109-6114. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8702
  69. Koretz J, Handelman, G. Model of the accommodative mechanism in the human eye. Vis Res. 1982;22(8):917-927.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(82)90028-1
  70. Travers M. Structural correlates of shape change in the primate crystalline lens. Ph. D. Thesis. London: The City University; 1990.
  71. Weeber H, van der Heijde R. Internal crystalline lens dynamics during accommodation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86(6):642-647.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01116.x
  72. Danysh B, Duncan M. The lens capsule. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88(2):151-164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2008.08.002
  73. Kumari S, Eswaramoorthy S, Mathias R, Varadaraj K. Unique and analogous functions of aquaporin 0 for fiber cell architecture and ocular lens transparency. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812(9):1089-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.04.001
  74. Kumari S, Gupta N, Shiels A, Fitzgerald P, Menon A, Mathias R, Varadaraj K. Role of Aquaporin 0 in lens biomechanics. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;462(4):339-345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.04.138
  75. Augusteyn R. On the contribution of the nucleus and cortex to human lens shape and size. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101(1):64-68.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12539
  76. Krag S, Andreassen T. Mechanical properties of the human lens capsule. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22(6):749-767.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-9462(03)00063-6
  77. David G, Pedigri R, Humphrey J. Accommodation of the human lens capsule using a finite element model based on nonlinear regionally anisotropic biomembranes. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017;20(3):302-307.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2016.1228907
  78. Coleman D. On the hydraulic suspension theory of accommodation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1986;84:846-868. 
  79. Coleman D. Unified model for accommodative mechanism. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970;69(6):1063-1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(70)91057-3
  80. Croft M, Heatley G, Mcdonald J, Katz A, Kaufman P. Accomodative movements of the lens/capsule and the strand that extends between the posterior vitreous zonule insertion zone and the lens equator, in relation to the vitreous face and aging. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016;36(1):21-32.  https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12256
  81. Svetlova OV, Makarov FN, Kotlyar KE, Zaseva MV, Koshits IN. Morphological and functional features of the design of the lens ciliary band as a key link in the accommodation mechanism of the human eye. Morfologiya. 2003;123(3):7-16. (In Russ.).
  82. Flügel-Koch C, May C, Lütjen-Drecoll E. Presence of a contractile cell network in the human choroid. Ophthalmologica. 1996;210(5):296-302.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000310728
  83. Nickla D, Wallma J. The multifunctional choroid. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29(2):144-168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.12.002

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.