The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Khamraeva L.S.

Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan

Narzullaeva D.U.

Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan

Factors influencing target refraction in children with pseudophakia after extraction of congenital cataract

Authors:

Khamraeva L.S., Narzullaeva D.U.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(3): 93‑99

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202013603193

Read: 2636 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

FACTORS INFLUENCING TARGET REFRACTION IN CHILDREN WITH PSEUDOPHAKIA AFTER EXTRACTION OF CONGENITAL CATARACT
FACTORS INFLUENCING TARGET REFRACTION IN CHILDREN WITH PSEUDOPHAKIA AFTER EXTRACTION OF CONGENITAL CATARACT

To cite this article:

Khamraeva LS, Narzullaeva DU. Factors influencing target refraction in children with pseudophakia after extraction of congenital cataract. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(3):93‑99. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202013603193

Подписка 2026 Вестник офтальмологии (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Combined approach to cata­ract surgery in kera­toconus. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(6):107-111
Osmo­genic causes of reve­rsible changes in light scattering power and refraction of hydrophilic intraocular lens in the early postoperative period. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(3):27-36
Current approaches to improving the effe­ctiveness of multifocal and exte­nded depth of focus intraocular lenses. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(4):110-116
Abstract:

The article describes the factors affecting the target refraction of pseudophakic eyes of children after extraction of congenital cataracts. The factors include features of the echobiometric parameters of the eye, refraction, comorbidity of congenital cataracts and ocular pathologies, margins of error in calculating strength of the intraocular lens, localization and structure of the artificial lens, as well as correction of obscure or refractive amblyopia in pseudophakic eyes. Development of the algorithm for correction of residual refraction of pseudophakic eyes in children both before and after IOL implantation with consideration of each of those factors currently remains a relevant problem.

Keywords:

target refraction
congenital cataract
aphakia
pseudophakia
intraocular lens

Authors:

Khamraeva L.S.

Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan

Narzullaeva D.U.

Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan

Close metadata

References:

  1. Bikbov MM, Ishberdina LSh. Intraocular correction of aphakia in young children with congenital cataract. VESTNIK OGU. 2010;12:35-37. (In Russ.).
  2. Lambert SR, Lynn M, Drews-Botsch C. A comparison of grating visual acuity, strabismus, and reoperation outcomes among children with aphakia and pseudophakia after unilateral cataract surgery during the first six months of life. J AAPOS. 2001;5(2):70-75. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpa.2001.111015
  3. Wilson ME, Jr, Bartholomew LR, Trivedi RH. Pediatric cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation: practice styles and preferences of the 2001 ASCRS and AAPOS memberships. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(9)1811-1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00220-7
  4. Chak M, Wade A, Rahi JS, British Congenital Cataract Interest Group. Long-term visual acuity and its predictors after surgery for congenital cataract: findings of the British Congenital Cataract Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(10):4262-4269. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1160
  5. Katargina LA. Detskaya oftal’mologiya federal’noe klinicheskie rekomendatsii. M.: SENTISS; 2016. (In Russ.).
  6. Vasavada AR, Vasavada SA, Bobrova N.Outcomes of pediatric cata- ract surgery in anterior persistent fetal vasculature. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 38:849-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.045
  7. Dandona R, Dandona L. Review of ndings of the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study: policy implications for eye-care services. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2001;49:215-234.
  8. Shamrani MA, Turkmani ShA. Update intraocular lens implantation in children. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012;26(3):271-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.05.005
  9. Katargina LA, Kruglova TB, Egiyan NS. Federal clinical guidelines diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of children with congenital cataract. Rossiiskaya pediatricheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2015;3:55-57. (In Russ.).
  10. Bobrova NF. Glaznyie travmyi u detey. M.: Meditsina; 2003. (In Russ.).
  11. Avetisov SE, Kas’yanov AA, Il’yakova LA. Correction of aphakia after early surgery for congenital cataracts. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 1991;6:61-69. (In Russ.).
  12. Kruglova TB. On the issue of calculating the dioptricity of the IOL implanted in children of the first year of life with congenital cataracts. Sovremennaya optometriya. 2011;8:18-21. (In Russ.).
  13. Kruglova TB. Features of extraction of congenital cataract with IOL implantation in children of the first year of life with congenital cataracts. Rossiiskaya pediatricheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2008;4:32-35. (In Russ.).
  14. Wilson ME, Trivedi RH. Axial length measurement techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012;26 (1):13-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.11.002
  15. Capozzi P, Morini C, Piga S, Cuttini M, VadalÁ P. Corneal curvature and axial length values in children with congenital/infantile cataract in the first 42 months of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4774-4778. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1564
  16. Katargina LA, Kruglova TB, Egiyan NS. The dynamics of the length of the anterior-posterior axis of the eye and refraction in children with pseudophaia after early surgery of the congenital cataracts. Rossiiskaya pediatricheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2015;2:20-24. (In Russ.).
  17. Khamraeva LS, Bobokha LYu, Abdurakhmanova ChK, Makhmudova ZA. Comparative analysis of the anatomical parameters of the eyeball in children with ametropia, congenital glaucoma, aphakia and artifactia. Rossiiskii oftal’mologicheskii zhurnal. 2019;12:38-42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.215116/2072-0076-2019-12-3-38-42
  18. Vasavada AR, Raj SM, Nihalani B. Rate of axial growth after congenital cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:915-924.
  19. Vasavada V, Shah SK, Vasavada VA, Vasavada AR, Trivedi RH, Srivastava S, et al. Comparison of IOL power calculation formulae for pediatric eyes. Eye (Lond). 2016;30(9):1242-1250. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.171
  20. Sidorenko EN. Oftal’mologiya. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: Media Sfera; 2007. (In Russ.).
  21. Kushnarevich NYu. An aggressive approach to hyperopia management: a method of maximum use of adaptive reserves intrinsic for the algorithms of natural refractive development. Rossiiskii oftal’mologicheskii zhurnal. 2017; 2:78-85. (In Russ.). https://doi. org/10.215116/2072-0076-2017-10-2-78-85
  22. Avetisov EhS. Miopiya. M.: Meditsina; 1999. (In Russ.).
  23. Somov EE. Izbrannyie razdelyi detskoy klinicheskoy oftalmologii. SPb.: Chelovek; 2016. (In Russ.).]
  24. Dahan E, Drusedau Choice of lens and dioptric power in pediatric pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Sur. 1997;23:618-623.
  25. McClatchey SK, Parks MM. Theoretic refractive changes after lens implantation in childhood. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1744-1751.
  26. Hutchinson AK, Drews-Botsch C, Lambert S Myopic shift after intraocular lens implantation during childhood. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1752-1757.
  27. Collenbrander MC. Calculation of an iris clip lens for distance vision. Br J Ophthalmol. 1973;57:735-740.
  28. Binkhorst RD. The optical design of intraocular lens implants. Ophthalmic Surg. 1975;6:17-31.
  29. Sanders D, Retzlaff J, Kraff M, et al. Comparison accuracy of the Binkhorst, Colenbrander and SRK implant power prediction formulas. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1981;7:337-340.
  30. Retzlaff J, Sanders D, Kraff M. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:333-340.
  31. Demakova LV, Zamyrov AA, Chuprov AD,Kudryavtseva YuV, Ivonin KS. Analiz prichin refraktsionnyih oshibok pri implantatsii intraokulyarnyih linz. Kirov: Prizma info; 2016. (In Russ.).
  32. Happe V. Oftal’mologiya. Perevod pod obsh. red. A.N. Amirova. 2-e izd. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2005. (In Russ.).
  33. Trivedi RH, Wilson ME, et al. Selecting Intraocular Lens Power in Children. Ophthalmic Pearls Pediatrics. 2006;35-36.
  34. Katargina LA, Kruglova TB, Trifonova OB, Egiyan NS, Kogoleva LV, Arestova NN. Artifact refraction after surgical treatment of congenital cataracts. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2019;135(1):36-41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913501136
  35. Einighammer J, Oltrup T, Bendi T, Jean B. Calculating intraocular lensgeometry by real ray tracing. J Refract Surg. 2007;23(4):393-404.
  36. Olsen T. The accuracy of ultrasonic determination of axial length inpseudophakic eyes. Acta Ophtalmol (Copenh). 1990;67:141-144.
  37. Neely DE, Plager DA, Borger SM, Golub RL. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children undergoing cataract surgery. J AAPOS. 2005;9(2):160-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.010
  38. Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Tsimhoni O, Archer SM, DelMonte MA. Effect of axial length and keratometry measurement error on intraocular lens implant power prediction formulas in pediatric patients. J AAPOS. 2008;12:173-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.10.012
  39. Trivedi RH, Lambert SR, Lynn MJ, Wilson ME. Role of preoperative biometry in selecting initial contact lens power in IATS. J AAPOS. 2014;18(3):251-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.01.012
  40. Vander Veen DK, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, Bothun ED, McClatchey SK, Weakley DR, DuBois LG, Lambert SR. Predictability of Intraocular Lens Calculation and Early Refractive Status: The Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(3):293-299. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.358
  41. Manning CA, Kloess PM. Comparison of portable automated keratometry and manual keratometry for IOL calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23:1213-1216.
  42. Capozzi P, Morini C, Piga S, Cuttini M, Vadal ÁP. Corneal curvature and axial length values in children with congenital/infantile cataract in the first 42 months of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4774-4478. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1564
  43. Ehlers N, Sorensen T, Bramsen T, Poulsen EH. Central corneal thickness in newborns and children. Acta Ophthalmol. 1976;54:285-290.
  44. Zadnik K, Manny RE, Yu JA, Mitchell GL, Cotter SA, Quiralte JC, et al. Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:226-236.
  45. Trivedi RH, Wilson ME. Keratometry in pediatric eyes with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:38-42. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.22
  46. Flitcroft DI, Knight-Nanan D, Bowell R, Lanigan B, O’Keefe M. Intraocular lenses in children: Changes in axial length, corneal curvature, and refraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:265-269.
  47. Egorova EV, Malyugin BE, Uzunyan DU, Polyanskaya EG. Patterns of measurements of a capsule bag after phacoemulsification with IOL implantation during ultrasound biomicroscopy studies. Byulleten’ sibirskogo otdeleniya RAN. 2009;4:12-16. (In Russ.).
  48. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power calculation. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;472-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.x
  49. Khamraeva LS, Narzullaeva DU. Clinical and functional results of primary implantation of an intraocular lens in children with cataracts of various etiologies. Zhurnal Teoreticheskoi i klinicheskoi meditsiny. 2018;3:100-102. (In Russ.).
  50. Li Y, Wang J, Chen Z, Tang X. Effect of hydrophobic acrylic versus hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification: Meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077864
  51. Ness PJ, Werner L, Maddula S, Davis D, Zaugg B, Stringham J, et al. Pathology of 219 human cadaver eyes with 1-piece or 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses: Capsular bag opacification and sites of square-edged barrier breach. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:923-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.036
  52. Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Konen W. Multifocal intraocular lens implantation in pediatric cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1375-1380.
  53. Lapid-Gortzak R, Meulen IJ, Jellema HM, Mourits MP, Nieuwendaal CP. Seven-year follow-up of unilateral multifocal pseudophakia in a child. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37:267-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0232-5
  54. Bikbov MM, Bikbulatova AA, Mannanova RF, Khusnitdinov II. Surgical correction of residual ametropia in pseudophakic eye. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2011;115-117. (In Russ.).
  55. Epelbaum M, Milleret C, Buisseret P, Dufier JL. The sensitive period for strabismic amblyopia in humans. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:323-327.
  56. Scheiman MM, Hertle RW, Beck RW, Edwards AR, Birch E. Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:437-447. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.123.4.437
  57. Bikbov MM, Khusnitdinov II. LASIK in children with residual ametropia after intraocular correction of congenital cataract. Rossiiskaya pediatricheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2008;3:39-42. (In Russ.).
  58. Avetisov SE, Kashchenko TP, Shamshinova AM. Printsipyi korrektsii ametropii posle rannih operatsiy pri vrozhdennyih kataraktah. Zritelnyie funktsii i ih korrektsiya u detey. M.: Meditsina; 2005. (In Russ.).
  59. Narzullaeva DU, Khamraeva LS. Aspect of Correction of Ametropiya in Children Congenital Cataracts. TOOAJ. 2019;2(2):1-4.
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.