The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 101-59-87
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Voronin G.V.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Bubnova I.A.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea after keratorefractive surgery

Authors:

Voronin G.V., Bubnova I.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(4): 108‑112

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2019135041108

Views: 1141

Downloaded: 68

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Voronin GV, Bubnova IA. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea after keratorefractive surgery. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(4):108‑112. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2019135041108

Подписка 2025 (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Effect of refractive surgery on Maklakov tono­metry resu­lts. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(2-2):51-59
Clinical outcomes of SMILE Xtra for myopia correction. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):87-96

Biomechanical properties of the cornea are important for the functioning of the ocular optical system. They affect such qualities of the system as correct diffraction and resistance to different external action. Keratorefractive surgery widely used in clinical practice nowadays significantly upsets corneal biomechanics, which introduces a margin of error for IOP measurements done by different methods. The article reviews literature devoted to the problem of changes of corneal biomechanical properties after refractive surgeries.

Keywords:

corneal biomechanical properties
refractive surgery
LASIK

Authors:

Voronin G.V.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Bubnova I.A.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

List of references:

  1. Avetisov SE, Bubnova IA, Antonov AA. Clinical and experimental aspects of investigation of biomechanical properties of corneoscleral shell. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2013;129(5):83-91. (In Russ.)
  2. Iomdina EN, Bauer SM, Kotliar KE. Biomekhanika glaza: teoreticheskie aspekty i klinicheskie prilozheniya. M.: Real Time; 2015. (In Russ.)
  3. Iomdina EN, Petrov SYu, Antonov AA, Novikov IA, Pahomova NI, Archakov AY. The corneoscleral shell of the eye: potentials of assessing biomechanical parameters in normal and pathological conditions. Oftal’mologiya. 2016;13(2):62-68. (In Russ.)
  4. Balashevich LI. Refrakcionnaya hirurgiya. SPb.: Izdatel’skij dom SPbMAPO; 2002. (In Russ.)
  5. Avetisov SE, Fyodorov AA, Vvedenskyi AS, Nenyukov AK. Experimental study of radial keratotomy influence on corneal mechanical properties. Oftal’mologicheskij zhurnal. 1990;154-58. (In Russ.)
  6. Forstot SL, Damiano RE. Trauma after radial keratotomy. Ophthalmology. 1988;95(6):833-835.
  7. Fernandez J, Rodriguez-Vallejo M, Martinez J, Tauste A, Pinero DP. Corneal biomechanics after laser refractive surgery: Unmasking differences between techniques. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2018;44(3):390-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.10.054
  8. Stonecipher K, Ignacio TS, Stonecipher M. Advances in refractive surgery: microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation in relation to safety, efficacy, predictability, and biomechanical stability. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2006;17(4):368-372. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.icu.0000233957.88509.2d
  9. Avetisov SE, Bubnova IA, Antonov AA. Corneal biomechanics: clinical importance, evaluation, possibilities of sistemization of examination approaches. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2010;126(6):3-7. (In Russ.)
  10. Roy AS, Dupps WJ. Patient-specific modeling of corneal refractive surgery outcomes and inverse estimation of elastic property changes. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2011;133(1):011002.
  11. Djotyan GP, Kurtz RM, Fernández DC, Juhasz T. An analytically solvable model for biomechanical response of the cornea to refractive surgery. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2001;123(5):440-445.
  12. Bryant MR, McDonnell PJ. Constitutive laws for biomechanical modeling of refractive surgery. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 1996;118(4):473-481.
  13. Elsheikh A, Anderson K. Comparative study of corneal strip extensometry and inflation tests. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2005;2(3):177-185. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2005.0034
  14. Avetisov S, Bubnova I, Novikov I, Antonov A, Siplivyi V. Experimental study on the mechanical strain of corneal collagen. Journal of Biomechanics. 2013;46(10):1648-1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.04.008
  15. Wang H, Prendiville PL, McDonnell PJ, Chang WV. An ultrasonic technique for the measurement of the elastic moduli of human cornea. Journal of Biomechanics. 1996;29(12):1633-1636.
  16. Friedenwald JS., Moses R. Modern refinements in tonometry. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 1950;4(1):335-362.
  17. Avetisov SE, Bubnova IA, Antonov AA. Once more about the diagnostic capacities of elastic tonometry. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2008;124(5):19-22. (In Russ.)
  18. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2005;31(1):156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044
  19. Hanna KD, Jouve FE, Waring GO, Ciarlet PG. Computer simulation of arcuate keratotomy for astigmatism. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 1992;8(2):152-163.
  20. Hanna KD, Jouve F, Bercovier MH, Waring GO. Computer simulation of lamellar keratectomy and laser myopic keratomileusis. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 1988;4(6):222-231.
  21. Tong X, Zhang H, Bao W, Davis R. Cluster Analysis of Patients Evaluated in Laser Refractive Surgery. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal. 2017;5(6):00151.
  22. Achiron A, Gur Z, Aviv U, Hilely A, Mimouni M, Karmona L, Rokach L, Kaiserman I. Predicting refractive surgery outcome: machine learning approach with big data. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2017;33(9):592-597. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170616-03
  23. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2005;31(1):146-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.031
  24. Elsheikh A, Wang D. Numerical modelling of corneal biomechanical behaviour. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. 2007;10(2):85-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840600976013
  25. Avetisov SE, Mamikonyan VR, Zavalishin NN, Nenukov AK. Experimental study of mechanical properties of cornea and sclera. Ophthalmic Journal. 1988;4:233-237. (In Russ.)
  26. Pinsky PM, van der Heide D, Chernyak D. Computational modeling of mechanical anisotropy in the cornea and sclera. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2005;31(1):136-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.048
  27. Meek KM, Newton RH. Organization of collagen fibrils in the corneal stroma in relation to mechanical properties and surgical practice. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 1999;15(6):695-699.
  28. Babuška I, Strouboulis T. The finite element method and its reliability. Oxford University Press; 2001.
  29. Pandolfi A, Manganiello F. A model for the human cornea: constitutive formulation and numerical analysis. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2006;5(4):237-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-005-0014-x
  30. Bao F, Wang J, Cao S, Liao N, Shu B, Zhao Y, Li Y, Zheng X, Huang J, Chen S, Wang Q, Elsheikh A. Development and clinical verification of numerical simulation for laser in situ keratomileusis. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2018;83:126-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.016
  31. Kostenev SV, Chernyh VV. Biomechanical and immunological changes of the cornea after eximerlaser refractive surgery (review of literature). Sibirskij nauchnyj medicinskij zhurnal. 2009;29(4):71-74. (In Russ.)
  32. Avetisov SE, Voronin GV. Experimental study of corneal mechanical properties after eximer laser ablation. RMZH. Klinicheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2001;2(3):83-86. (In Russ.)
  33. Avetisov SE, Novikov IA, Bubnova IA, Antonov AA, Siplivyi VI. Determination of corneal elasticity coefficient using the ORA database. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2010;26(7):520-524. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20091030-01
  34. Avetisov SE, Mamikonyan VR, Shmeleva-Demir OA, Karamyan AA, Bubnova IA, Kazaryan EE, Galoyan NS, Karapetyan AT. Intraocular pressure, ocular blood flow, and corneal biomechanics changes after LASIK surgery for myopia. Vestnik oftalmologii. 2016;132(4):24-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2016132424-28
  35. Güell JL, Velasco F, Roberts C, Sisquella MT, Mahmoud A. Corneal flap thickness and topography changes induced by flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2005;31(1):115-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.045
  36. Roberts C. Biomechanics of the cornea and wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2002;18(5):589-592.
  37. Hamilton DR, Johnson RD, Lee N, Bourla N. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2008;34(12):2049-2056.
  38. Hassan Z, Modis L, Szalai E, Berta A, Nemeth G. Examination of ocular biomechanics with a new Scheimpflug technology after corneal refractive surgery. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2014;37(5):337-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2014.05.001
  39. Dupps WJ. Biomechanical modeling of corneal ectasia. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2007;23(1):186-190.
  40. Santhiago MR, Giacomin NT, Smadja D, Bechara SJ. Ectasia risk factors in refractive surgery. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ). 2016;10:713. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S51313
  41. Vahdati A, Seven I, Mysore N, Randleman JB, Dupps WJ. Computational biomechanical analysis of asymmetric ectasia risk in unilateral post-LASIK ectasia. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2016;32(12):811-820. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20160929-01
  42. Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Astyrakakis NI. Corneal ectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2001;27(11):1796-1802.
  43. Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ. Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2014;40(6):991-998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.013
  44. Hersh PS, Greenstein SA, Fry KL. Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2011;37(1):149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.030
  45. Dauwe C, Touboul D, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Kérautret J, Fournier P, Malecaze F, Colin J. Biomechanical and morphological corneal response to placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2009;35(10):1761-1767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.033
  46. Cennamo G, Intravaja A, Boccuzzi D, Marotta G, Cennamo G. Treatment of keratoconus by topography-guided customized photorefractive keratectomy: two-year follow-up study. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2008;24(2):145-149.
  47. Kamburoglu G, Ertan A. Intacs implantation with sequential collagen cross-linking treatment in postoperative LASIK ectasia. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2008;24(7):726-729.
  48. Kanellopoulos A.J. Comparison of sequential vs same-day simultaneous collagen cross-linking and topography-guided PRK for treatment of keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2009;25(9):812-818. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20090813-10
  49. Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Kounis GA, Portaliou DM, Karavitaki AE, Magarakis M, Yoo S, Pallikaris IG. Simultaneous topography-guided PRK followed by corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2009;25(9):807-811. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20090813-09
  50. Krueger RR, Kanellopoulos AJ. Stability of simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy and riboflavin/UVA cross-linking for progressive keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2010;26(10):827-832. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20100921-11
  51. Stojanovic A, Zhang J, Chen X, Nitter TA, Chen S, Wang Q. Topography-guided transepithelial surface ablation followed by corneal collagen cross-linking performed in a single combined procedure. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2010;26(2):145-152. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20100121-10

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register


We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.