The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

At’kova E.L.

Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Zhukov O.V.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

Krakhovetskiĭ N.N.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Yartsev V.D.

Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Reznikova L.V.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Intraoperative prevention of dacryocystitis relapse

Authors:

At’kova E.L., Zhukov O.V., Krakhovetskiĭ N.N., Yartsev V.D., Reznikova L.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2018;134(5): 270‑275

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2018134051270

Read: 819 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

INTRAOPERATIVE PREVENTION OF DACRYOCYSTITIS RELAPSE
INTRAOPERATIVE PREVENTION OF DACRYOCYSTITIS RELAPSE

To cite this article:

At’kova EL, Zhukov OV, Krakhovetskiĭ NN, Yartsev VD, Reznikova LV. Intraoperative prevention of dacryocystitis relapse. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2018;134(5):270‑275. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2018134051270

Подписка 2026 Вестник офтальмологии (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Analysis of the effe­ctiveness of bica­nalicular intu­bation of lacrimal ducts in endo­nasal endo­scopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Russian Rhinology. 2025;(1):36-41
Comparative characteristics of the microbial landscape of the maxi­llary sinus in patients with chro­nic dacryocystitis and chro­nic sinu­sitis. Russian Rhinology. 2025;(2):117-125
Abstract:

The article reviews the literature devoted to modern intraoperative methods of preventing cicatricial process at the site of dacryostoma after endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Despite the constant improvement of the surgery technique, complications in the postoperative period still occur. They include the formation of granulation tissue at the sites of dacryostoma, synechiae in the nasal cavity, or narrowing of the dacryostoma, which ultimately leads to a relapse of the disease. The main prevention methods are construction of flaps from the medial wall of the lacrimal sac, from mucosa of the nasal cavity, and intubation of the dacryostoma with the lacrimal implant. They are used separately and in various combinations.

Keywords:

nasolacrimal duct
endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
dacryostoma
granulations
prevention of dacryocystitis relapse

Authors:

At’kova E.L.

Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Zhukov O.V.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

Krakhovetskiĭ N.N.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Yartsev V.D.

Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Reznikova L.V.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Close metadata

References:

  1. Caldwell GW. Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct with preservation of the canaliculi and an incidental description of a new lachrymal probe. NY Med J. 1893;57:581.
  2. West JM. A window resection of the nasal duct in cases of stenosis. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 1910;12(2):654.
  3. Rice DH. Endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy-A cadaver study. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy. 1988;2(3):127. https://doi.org/10.2500/105065888781693122
  4. McDonogh M, Meiring JH. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 1989;103(6):585-587. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100109405
  5. Wormald PJ. Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. The Laryngoscope. 2002;112(1):69-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35267-1_21
  6. Majumder A, Singh M, Das C, Das S, Hazra TK. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(2):371-375.
  7. Becker BB. Dacryocystorhinostomy without flaps. Ophtalmic Surg. 1988;19:419-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-012-0541-6
  8. Sonkhya N, Mishra P. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy with nasal mucosal and posterior lacrimal sac flap. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(3):320-326. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215108003897
  9. Trimarchi M, Giordano Resti A, Bellini C, Forti M, Bussi M. Anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(11):1747-1752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1002-z
  10. Jawaheer L, MacEwen CJ, Anijeet D. Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;24(2):CD007097. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007097.pub3
  11. Beloglazov VG. Alternatives to recovery of lacrimal duct patency. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2006;122(1):8-12. (In Russ.)
  12. Baek JS, Jeong SH, Lee JH, Choi HS, Kim SJ, Jang JW. Cause and management of patients with failed endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology. 2017;10(1):85. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2016.00192
  13. Gupta N. Improving results in endoscopic DCR. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2011;63(1):40-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-010-0112-7
  14. At’kova EL, Rein DA, Yartsev VD, Subbot AM. Influence of TGF-β cytokine and a number of other biochemical factors on regenerative process. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2017;133(4):89-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2017133489-96
  15. At’kova EL, Ramenskaya GV, Root AO, Krakhovetskii NN, Yartsev VD, Yartsev SD, Shokhin IE. Mitomycin C after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2017;133(5):16-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2017133516-22
  16. Ji QS, Zhong JX, Tu YH, Wu WC. New mucosal flap modification for endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in Asians. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(6):704-707. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.06.10
  17. Prakash MD, Viswanatha B, Rasika R. Powered Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy with Mucosal Flaps and Trimming of Anterior End of Middle Turbinate. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;67(4):333-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-014-0807-2
  18. At’kova EL, Yartsev VD, Tomashevskiy IO, Krakhovetskiy NN. Treatment choice in dacryostenosis based on single-photon emission computed tomography and X-ray computed tomography findings. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2016;132(3):15-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2016132315-20
  19. Olver JM. The success rates for endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(11):1431. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.11.1431
  20. Saratziotis A, Emanuelli E, Gouveris H, Babighian G. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: creating a window with a drill without use of mucosal flaps. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129(9):992-995. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480802495396
  21. Wu W, Cannon PS, Yan W, Tu Y, Selva D, Qu J. Effects of Merogel coverage on wound healing and ostial patency in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for primary chronic dacryocystitis. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(6):746-753. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.44
  22. Ayoob M, Mahida K. Outcome and complications of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2013;29(5):1236. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.295.3393
  23. Krasnozhen VN. Coblation in chronic dacryocystitis treatment. Rossijskaya otorinolaringologiya. 2016;81(2):134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18692/1810-4800-2016-2-134-136
  24. Feng YF, Cai JQ, Zhang JY, Han XH. A meta-analysis of primary dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011;46(6):521-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2011.09.008
  25. Wu S, et al. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with an otologic T-type ventilation tube in repeated revision cases. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0539-7
  26. Beloglazov VG, At’kova EL, Abdurakhmanov GA, Krakhovetskii NN. Prevention of ostial obstruction after microendoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2013;129(2):19-22. (In Russ.)
  27. Orlova EI, Davydov DV. Lacrimal stents in the larimal pathways’ surgery. Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2017;10(4):48-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17816/OV10448-55
  28. Ritleng P. A simplified technique for lacrimal intubation. Ocul Surg News. 1996;14(7):25-27.
  29. Crawford JS. Intubation of obstructions in the lacrimal system. Can J Ophthalmol. 1977;12:289-292.
  30. Shkolnik SF. New method of bicanalicular drainage of lacrimal passages. Sibirskij nauchnyj medicinskij zhurnal. 2009;4:114-117. (In Russ.)
  31. Fayet B, Bernard JA. A monocanalicular stent with self-stabilizing meatic fixation in surgery of excretory lacrimal ducts. Initial results. Ophtalmologie. 1990;4(4):351-357.
  32. At’kova EL, Krakhovetskii NN, Yartsev VD. Modified method of ostium intubation after endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2015;8(4):16-23. (In Russ.)
  33. Beloglazov VG, Grusha OV, Saad-El’din NM, At’kova EL, Malaeva LV. The prevention and treatment of recurrences after dacryorhinostomies. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 1999;5:14-17. (In Russ.)
  34. Kashkouli MB, Kempster RC, Galloway GD, Beigi B. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults.Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2005;21(2):142-147. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iop.0000155524.04390.7b
  35. Hodgson N, Bratton E, Whipple K, Priel A, Oh SR, Fante RG, Kikkawa DO, Korn BS. Outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flap preservation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30(1):24-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0b013e3182a7502e
  36. Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Teräsvirta M, Nuutinen J, Seppä J. Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study. American Journal of Rhinology. 2008;22(2):214-217. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2006.20.2955
  37. Unlu HH, Gunhan K, Baser EF, Songu M. Long-term results in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: is intubation really required? Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery. 2009;140(4):589-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.056
  38. Chong KK, Lai FH, Ho M, Luk A, Wong BW, Young A. Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction Ophthalmology. 2013;120(10):2139-2145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.036
  39. Shashidhar K, Nagalotimath U, Dixit D. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stenting: a comparative study. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2014;7(3):244-247.
  40. Ananth L, Hosamani P, Chary G. Efficacy of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy, using ‘cold steel’ instruments without stenting, in treatment of distal nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Laryngol Otol. 2011;125(6):590-594. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002221511100017x
  41. Callejas CA, Tewfik MA, Wormald PJ. Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with selective stenting. The Laryngoscope. 2010;120(7):1449-1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20916
  42. Choung HK, Khwarg SI. Selective non‐intubation of a silicone tube in external dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2007;85(3):329-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00827.x
  43. Madge SN, Selva D. Intubation in routine dacryocystorhinostomy: why we do what we do. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2009;37(6):620-623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02094.x
  44. Magomedov MM, Ibragimov ShI, Starostina AV, Magomedov GM. Dacryocystitits relapses after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Rossiyskaya Rinologiya. 2013;21(2):54. (In Russ.)
  45. Kansu L, Aydin E, Avci S, Kal A, Gedik S. Comparison of surgical outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with or without mucosal flaps. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009;36(5):555-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2009.01.005
  46. Obodov VA. Videoehndoskopicheskie tekhnologii lecheniya dakriocistitov. Materialy V Evro-Aziatskoj konferencii po oftal’mohirurgii MNTK «Mikrohirurgiya glaza». Ekaterinburg. 2009. (In Russ.) https://www.eyepress.ru/obj0042/sbornik.pdf#page=222
  47. Çukurova I, Caner Mercan G, Çetinkaya E, Gümüsssoy M, Söken H. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: outcomes using mucosal flap preserving technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(5):1661-1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2285-z
  48. Peng W, Tan B, Wang Y, Wang H, Wang Z, Liang X. A Modified Preserved Nasal and Lacrimal Flap Technique in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy. Sci Rep. 2017;28;7(1):6809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07364-9
  49. Mueller SK, et al. Endoscopic DCR using bipedicled interlacing mucosal flaps. The Laryngoscope. 2017;128(4):794-797. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26730
  50. Codère F, Denton P, Corona J. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a modified technique with preservation of the nasal and lacrimal mucosa. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26(3):161-164. https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0b013e3181b80af6
  51. Krasnozhen VN, Shkolnik SF. Our experience of nasolacrimal duct channel obliteration treatment O. Oftal’mohirurgiya. 2007;2:37-39. (In Russ.)
  52. Obodov VA, Shlyakhtov MI. Lacrimal bypass surgery in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Oftal’mologiya. 2014;11(4):54-58. (In Russ.)
  53. Stuchilov VA, Nikitin AA, Gerasimenko MYu, Obodov VA. Travmaticheskie povrezhdeniya glaznicy i slezootvodyashchih putej. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2015. (In Russ.)
  54. Kirtane MV, Lall A, Chavan K, Satwalekar D. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with flap suturing. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2013;65(2):236-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0354-z
  55. Khalifa MA, Ragab SM, Saafan ME, El-Guindy AS. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with double posteriorly based nasal and lacrimal flaps: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(4):782-787. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812447759
  56. Green R, Gohil R, Ross P. Mucosal and lacrimal flaps for endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;42(3):514-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812447759
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.