The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Mussabekova S.A.

Medical University of Karaganda

Stoyan A.O.

Institute of Forensic Examinations in Almaty State — Enterprise Center for Forensic Examination of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Mkhitaryan X.E.

Medical University of Karaganda

Craniometric aspects in forensic medical identification of the Kazakhstan population

Authors:

Mussabekova S.A., Stoyan A.O., Mkhitaryan X.E.

More about the authors

Journal: Forensic Medical Expertise. 2023;66(3): 24‑28

Read: 1851 times


To cite this article:

Mussabekova SA, Stoyan AO, Mkhitaryan XE. Craniometric aspects in forensic medical identification of the Kazakhstan population. Forensic Medical Expertise. 2023;66(3):24‑28. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/sudmed20236603124

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Hughes CE, Juarez C, Yim AD. Forensic anthropology casework performance: Assessing accuracy and trends for biological profile estimates on a comprehensive sample of identified decedent cases. J Forensic Sci. 2021;66(5):1602-1616. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14782
  2. Morgan RM. Forensic science. The importance of identity in theory and practice. Forensic Science International. Synergy. 2019;1:239-242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.09.001
  3. Francisco RA, Evison MP, Costa Junior MLD, Silveira TCP, Secchieri JM, Guimarães MA. Validation of a standard forensic anthropology examination protocol by measurement of applicability and reliability on exhumed and archive samples of known biological attribution. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;279:241-250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.08.015
  4. Hartley S, Winburn AP. A hierarchy of expert performance as applied to forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci. 2021;66(5):1617-1626. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14761
  5. Pashkova VI, Reznikov BD. Forensic medical identification of a person by bone remains. Saratov: Izdatelstvo Saratovskogo universiteta; 1978. (In Russ.).
  6. Cappella A, Gibelli D, Vitale A, Zago M, Dolci C, Sforza C, Cattaneo C. Preliminary study on sexual dimorphism of metric traits of cranium and mandible in a modern Italian skeletal population and review of population literature. Leg Med. 2020;44:101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101695
  7. Kyllonen KM, Simmons-Ehrhardt T, Monson KL. Stature estimation using measurements of the cranium for populations in the United States. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;281:184.e1-.e9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.10.011
  8. Woo EJ, Jung H, Tansatit T. Cranial index in a modern people of Thai ancestry. Anat Cell Biol. 2018;51(1):25-30.  https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2018.51.1.25
  9. Herrera MD, Tallman SD. Craniometric variation and ancestry estimation in two contemporary Caribbean populations. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;305:110013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110013
  10. Bertsatos A, Papageorgopoulou C, Valakos E, Chovalopoulou ME. Investigating the sex-related geometric variation of the human cranium. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132(5):1505-1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1790-z
  11. Kranioti EF, García-Donas JG, Can IO, Ekizoglu O. Ancestry estimation of three Mediterranean populations based on cranial metrics. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;286:265.e1-e8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.02.014
  12. Alekseev VP, Debets GF. Craniometry: Methods of Anthropological Research. M.: Nauka; 1964. (In Russ.).
  13. Tomilin VV. Medico-forensic identification Handbook of a forensic medical examiner. M.: Izdatelskaya gruppa NORMA-INFRA M; 2000. (In Russ.).
  14. Zvyagin VN. Forensic identification of a person by the skull: Dis. ... d-ra med. nauk. M. 1981. (In Russ.).
  15. Zvyagin VN, Grigoreva MA. The method of establishing the somatological features of a person during the forensic medical examination of bone remains. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. M. 2000. (In Russ.).
  16. Stern HS, Cuellar M, Kaye D. Reliability and validity of forensic science evidence. Significance. 2019;16:21-24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01250.x
  17. Fernandes LCC, Rabello PM, Santiago BM, Carvalho MVD, Sena Júnior MR, Soriano EP, Daruge E. Craniometric study of the Orbital Index in brazilian skulls. RGO, Rev Gaúch Odontol. 2021;69:e2021013. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-86372021001320190115
  18. David LK, Vidona WB. Anatomical evaluation of the craniometric points and dimensions among adult’s populations of the South-Eastern Nigerians and its implication for intracranial surgical procedures. Glob J Medical Clin Case Rep. 2021;8(3):116-119.  https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5282.000143
  19. Mussabekova S, Stoyan A, Mkhitaryan X. Assessment of the Possibilities of Forensic Identification Population of Kazakhstan by Craniometric Indicators. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022;10(A):685-694.  https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9130
  20. Zvyagin VN, Galitskaya OI. The optimization of sex identification based on the craniometric information in the population of the Caucasus for the purpose of medical criminalistics personality identification. Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertiza. 2018;61(6):21-24. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/sudmed20186106121
  21. Small C, Schepartz L, Hemingway J, Brits D. Three-dimensionally derived interlandmark distances for sex estimation in intact and fragmentary crania. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;287:127-135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.02.012
  22. Avent PR, Hughes CE, Garvin HM. Applying posterior probability informed thresholds to traditional cranial trait sex estimation methods. J Forensic Sci. 2022;67:440-449.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14947
  23. Ismagulov O, Ismagulova AO, Nadirbekov IO, Sataev MA. Dynamics of craniological indicators of ancient and medieval populations of the Kazakhstan in the light of the ethnogenesis of the Kazakh people. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsialnye, gumanitarnye, mediko-biologicheskie nauki. 2018;5(62):59-72. (In Russ.).
  24. Stansfield E, Parker J, O’Higgins P. A sensitivity study of human mandibular biting simulations using finite element analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports. 2018;22:420-432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.04.026
  25. Okkesim A, Sezen Erhamza T. Assessment of mandibular ramus for sex determination: Retrospective study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10(4):569-572.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.019
  26. Pengyue L, Siyuan X, Yi J, Wen Y, Xiaoning L, Guohua G, Shixiong W. ANINet: a deep neural network for skull ancestry estimation. BMC Bioinformatics. 2021;22(1):550.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04444-6
  27. Savoldi F, Massetti F, Tsoi JKH, Matinlinna JP, Yeung AWK, Tanaka R, Paganelli C, Bornstein M. Anteroposterior length of the maxillary complex and its relationship with the anterior cranial base. Angle Orthod. 2021;91(1):88-97.  https://doi.org/10.2319/020520-82.1
  28. Upapant V, Pattararchachai J, Urathamakul S, Setabutr D. Nasal Sidewall Dimensions in the Asian Nose: A Thai Cadaveric Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(1):5-9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02044-z
  29. Ibragimov ASh, Isaev NN, Tomaev TT, Makhmudlu NP. Alternative-variable relationships of craniometric characteristics and their applied perspectives. The Scientific Heritage. 2022;82(2):29-32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/9215-0365-2022-82-2-29-32
  30. Spradley MK. Use of craniometric data to facilitate migrant identifications at the United States/Mexico border. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021;175(2):486-496.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24241

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.