Technical and methodological support for postmortem radiation examinations in the pathological departments and the forensic bureau

Tumanova U.N.; Shchegolev A.I.; Kovalev A.V.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/sudmed20216402151

Tumanova U.N.

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I. Kulakov

ORCID: 0000-0002-0924-6555

Shchegolev A.I.

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I. Kulakov

ORCID: 0000-0002-2111-1530

Kovalev A.V.

Russian Center for Forensic Medical Examination

Technical and methodological support for postmortem radiation examinations in the pathological departments and the forensic bureau

Authors:

Tumanova U.N., Shchegolev A.I., Kovalev A.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Forensic Medical Expertise. 2021;64(2): 51‑57

DOI: 10.17116/sudmed20216402151

Read: 1939 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Tumanova UN, Shchegolev AI, Kovalev AV. Technical and methodological support for postmortem radiation examinations in the pathological departments and the forensic bureau. Forensic Medical Expertise. 2021;64(2):51‑57. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/sudmed20216402151

Подписка 2026 Судебно-медицинская экспертиза (Forensic Medical Expertise)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Expert evaluation of stillbirth in forensic medical practice. Forensic Medical Expertise. 2025;(2):55-60

Stillbirth: historical aspects and current state of the problem. Forensic Medical Expertise. 2025;(3):51-56

Diffuse changes in the brain in the acute phase of COVID-19 and after infection. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2025;(1):5-15

Regional features of the relationship between the causes of population death, place of its occurrence and autopsy frequency in the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2025;(8):7-13

Abstract:

The purpose of the work is to analyze the technical and methodological features of postmortem radiation studies based on literature data and the results of our own experience. To designate such studies, the term thanatoradiology has been proposed. The basis for the effective conduct of a thanatodiological examination is adequate technical support, which equally consists of the capabilities of the equipment for obtaining radiographs, CT and MR tomograms (type and generation of the device, technical features of a particular model), as well as the capabilities of the radiologist’s workstation with the help of which the computer processing of the obtained images is carried out, three-dimensional reconstructions are performed, the calculation of planar and volumetric parameters and additional information is obtained. The use of an X-ray unit allows one to assess only pronounced pathology and the presence of foreign objects. The effectiveness of a computed tomography device depends on the choice of the slice thickness and the step of the examination table. Research on a magnetic resonance imager is effective at certain magnetic induction strength, the form of a magnetic coil and the used mode of recording a pulse sequence. The objectivity and efficiency of digital processing of tomograms consists of the type of a radiologist’s workstation and installed programs for post-processing tomograms, including for modeling three-dimensional images and color mapping. The choice of a specific method of postmortem radiation research should be determined mainly by the research objectives. Research should be carried out taking into account age, body weight, individual characteristics and the state of body tissues. Today, it is advisable to use radiation methods as part of a comprehensive pathological and anatomical or forensic medical research to improve the quality and shorten the autopsy duration. The development of a unified protocol for postmortem CT and MRI studies that meets the pathological, anatomical and forensic requirements remains an urgent task.

Keywords:

autopsy

viropsy

thanatoradiology

postmortem CT

postmortem MRI

Authors:

Tumanova U.N.

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I. Kulakov

ORCID: 0000-0002-0924-6555

Shchegolev A.I.

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I. Kulakov

ORCID: 0000-0002-2111-1530

Kovalev A.V.

Russian Center for Forensic Medical Examination

Received:

03.06.2020

Accepted:

07.07.2020

Close metadata

References:

Kokov LS, Kinle AF, Sinitsyn VY, Filimonov BA. Possibilities of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in forensic medical examination of mechanical trauma and sudden death (a literature review). Neotlozhnaya meditsinskaya pomoshch. Zhurnal im. N.V. Sklifosovskogo. 2015;2:16-26. (In Russ.).
Michaud K, Genet P, Sabatasso S, Grabherr S. Postmortem imaging as a complementary tool for the investigation of cardiac death. Forensic Sci Res. 2019;4(3):211-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2019.1630944
von Stillfried S, Isfort P, Knüchel-Clarke R. Postmortem imaging procedures: Experiences and perspective. Pathologe. 2017;38(5):412-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-017-0344-3
Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A, Mallett S, Patankar T, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC. Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet. 2012;379(9811):136-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61483-9
Ampanozi G, Halbheer D, Ebert LC, Thali MJ, Held U. Postmortem imaging findings and cause of death determination compared with autopsy: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy and meta-analysis. Int J Legal Med. 2020;134(1):321-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02140-y
Lewis C, Hutchinson JC, Riddington M, Hill M, Arthurs OJ, Fisher J, Wade A, Doré CJ, Chitty LS, Sebire NJ. Minimally invasive autopsy for fetuses and children based on a combination of post-mortem MRI and endoscopic examination: a feasibility study. Health Technol Assess. 2019;23(46):1-104. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta23460
Tumanova UN, Shchegolev AI. Possibilities and limitations of virutal autopsy in neonatology. REJR. 2017;7(1):20-33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2017-7-1-20-33
Shakiryanova YuP, Leonov SV, Kurbanov SI. Vozmozhnosti komp’yuternoj tomografii v sudebno-medicinskih issledovaniyah. V kn.: Izbrannye voprosy sudebno-meditsinskoj ekspertizy. Pod red. Avdeeva A.I., Vlasyuka I.V., Nesterova A.V. Habarovsk. Izdatel’stvo Dal’nevostochnogo gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta. 2019;201-205. (In Russ.).
Jawad N, Sebire NJ, Wade A, Taylor AM, Chitty LS, Arthurs OJ. Body weight lower limits of fetal postmortem MRI at 1.5T. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(1):92-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14948
Thayyil S, Cleary JO, Sebire NJ, Scott RJ, Chong K, Gunny R, Owens CM, Olsen OE, Offiah AC, Parks HG, Chitty LS, Price AN, Yousry TA, Robertson NJ, Lythgoe MF, Taylor AM. Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet. 2009;374(9768):467-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60913-2
Tumanova UN, Shchegolev AI. Postmortem magnetic resonance tomography of fetuses and newborns. Meditsinskaya visualizatsiya. 2015;5:128-136. (In Russ.).
Norman W, Jawad N, Jones R, Taylor AM, Arthurs OJ. Perinatal and paediatric post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR): sequences and technique. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1062):20151028. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20151028
Arthurs OJ, van Rijn RR, Sebire NJ. Current status of paediatric post-mortem imaging: an ESPR questionnaire-based survey. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44(3):244-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2827-6
Addison S, Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S. Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: from research into clinical practice. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1036):20130621. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130621
Tumanova UN, Lyapin VM, Burov AA, Shchegolev AI, Degtyarev DN. Postmortem Characteristics of Lung Hypoplasia at Diaphragmatic Hernia: MRI — Pathomorphological Comparisons. Meditsinskaya visualizatsiya. 2017;4:132-142. (In Russ.).
Tumanova UN, Lyapin VM, Kozlova AV, Bychenko VG, Shchegolev AI. Galen vein aneurysm in a newborn: postmortem MSCT with contrast enhancement of vessels with in the autopsy. REJR. 2019;9(2):260-274. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-2-260-274
Tumanova UN, Serova NS, Bichenko VG, Shchegolev AI. Possibilities of using contrast agents in postmortem computed tomography. REJR. 2018;8(3):83-99. https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2018-8-3-83-99
Grabherr S, Doenz F, Steger B, Dirnhofer R, Dominguez A, Sollberger B, Gygax E, Rizzo E, Chevallier C, Meuli R, Mangin P. Multi-phase post-mortem CTangiography development of a standardized protocol. Int J Leg Med. 2011;125(6):791-802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0526-5
Tumanova UN, Lyapin VM, Burov AA, Podurovskaya YuL, Zaretskaya NV, Bychenko VG, Kozlova AV, Shchegolev AI. VACTERL association of newborn: postmortem ct and mri imaging for autopsy. REJR. 2017;7(2):191-208. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2017-7-2-191-208
Christe A, Flach P, Ross S, Spendlove D, Bolliger S, Vock P, Thali M. J. Clinical radiology and postmortem imaging (Virtopsy) are not the same: Specific and unspecific postmortem signs. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2010;12(5):215-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.05.005
Tumanova UN, Serova NS, Bychenko VG, Shchegolev AI. Possibilities of postmortem radiological studies for evaluation of lung lesions. REJR. 2018;8(2):198-221. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2018-8-2-198-221
Tumanova UN, Shchegolev AI. Radio-visualization of non-specific postmortem changes in the cardiovascular system. Sudebno-meditsinskaja ekspertiza. 2016;5:59-63. (In Russ.).
Shchegolev AI, Tumanova UN. Rol’ magnitno-rezonansno tomografii v opredelenii tanatogeneza. Kriminalistika — proshloe, nastojashhee, budushhee: dostizhenija i perspektivy razvitija. Pod. red. Bastrykina A.I. M.: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskoj akademii Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossijskoj Federacii; 2014;369-372. (In Russ.).
Dubrova SE, Vishnyakova MV, Kinle AF, Filimonov BA. Features of computed tomography autopsy: the problem of interpretation of specific and nonspecific artifacts. Luchevaja diagnostika i terapija. 2016;1:25-40. (In Russ.).
Dubrova SE, Filimonov BA. Postmortem computed tomography and its features: what should clinical radiologists know? Consilium Medicum. 2016;18(13):38-47. (In Russ.).
Bokin AN, Starberg AI, Kulesha NV. Luchevaya diagnostika kak vozmozhnyj istochnik oshibok pri ispolnenii sudebno-medicinskoj ekspertizy. Izbrannye voprosy sudebno-medicinskoj ekspertizy. Pod red. Avdeeva A.I., Vlasyuka I.V. Habarovsk: Izdatel’stvo Dal’nevostochnogo gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta; 2014; 19-21. (In Russ.).
Shtarberg AI, Gigolyan MO, Cheremkin MI, Kulesha NV, Smirnova EA. K voprosu o neobhodimosti kriticheskogo podhoda k dannym luchevoj diagnostiki v praktike sudebno-medicinskogo eksperta. V kn.: Izbrannye voprosy sudebno-medicinskoj ekspertizy. Pod red. Avdeeva A.I., Vlasyuka I.V., Nesterova A.V. Habarovsk: Izdatel’stvo Dal’nevostochnogo gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta; 2019;214-216. (In Russ.).
Kovalev AV, Kinle AF, Kokov LS, Sinitsyn VA, Fetisov VA, Filimonov BA. Actual possibilities of postmortem imaging in forensic medicine practice. Consilium Medicum. 2016;18(13):9-25. (In Russ.).
Eriksson A, Gustafsson T, Höistad M, Hultcrantz M, Jacobson S, Mejare I, Persson A. Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem imaging vs autopsy — A systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2017;89:249-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.003
van Rijn RR, Beek EJ, van de Putte EM, Teeuw AH, Nikkels PGJ, Duijst WLJM, Nievelstein RA, Dutch NODO Group. The value of postmortem computed tomography in paediatric natural cause of death: a Dutch observational study. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(11):1514-1522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3911-0
Tumanova UN, Fedoseeva VK, Liapin VM, Stepanov AV, Voevodin SM, Shchegolev AI. Postmortem computed tomography of stillborn with bone pathology. Meditsinskaya visualizatsiya. 2013;5:110-120. (In Russ.).
Tumanova UN, Fedoseeva VK, Lyapin VM, Bychenko VG, Voevodin SM, Shchegolev AI. Acardiacfetus: postmortem computed and magnetic resonance tomography imaging. Diagnosticheskaya i interventsionnaya Radiologiya. 2016;2:23-30. (In Russ.).
Obertová Z, Leipner A, Messina C, Vanzulli A, Fliss B, Cattaneo C, Sconfienza LM. Postmortem imaging of perimortem skeletal trauma. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;302:109921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109921
Kuznetsov LE, Buromsky IV, Kildyushov EM, Chogovadze GA. Potentialities of detecting injuries in children: a comparative X-ray, computer-aided tomographic, and morphologic study. Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertiza. 1995;3:3-10. (In Russ.).
Kil′dyushov EM, Egorova EV. A multitrauma: diagnostic capabilities of computer tomography in forensic medical practice. Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertiza. 2019;6:27-31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/sudmed20196206127
Baglivo M, Winklhofer S, Hatch GM, Ampanozi G, Thali MJ, Ruder TD. The rise of forensic and post-mortem radiology — Analysis of the literature between the year 2000 and 2011. J Foren Radiol Imag. 2013;1:3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2012.10.003
Tumanova UN, Lyapin VM, Bychenko VG, Schegolev AI, Sukhikh GT. Ppostmortem magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of congenital pneumonia. Vestnik Rossyiskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2016;4:44-50. (In Russ.).
Tumanova UN, Lyapin VM, Burov AA, Shchegolev AI, Sukhikh GT. The possibility of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnostics of lung hypoplasia. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2018;165(2):288-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-018-4150-6
Grabherr S, Heinemann A, Vogel H, Rutty G, Morgan B, Woźniak K, Dedouit F, Fischer F, Lochner S, Wittig H, Guglielmi G, Eplinius F, Michaud K, Palmiere C, Chevallier C, Mangin P, Grimm JM. Postmortem CT angiography compared with autopsy: A forensic multicenter study. Radiology. 2018;288(1):270-276. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018170559