Improving the symptomatic diagnosis of mesial occlusion — a stage of differential diagnostics of dentofacial anomalies

Malygin Yu.M.; Bednyakov A.A.; Abakarov S.I.; Basov A.V.; Malygin A.M.; Abakarova A.S.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202510401142

Malygin Yu.M.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0009-0002-5467-9234

Bednyakov A.A.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0009-0003-9047-7856

Abakarov S.I.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0000-0003-2369-3527

Basov A.V.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0000-0002-9339-1957

Malygin A.M.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0009-0007-9533-3658

Abakarova A.S.

Russian University of Medicine

ORCID: 0009-0000-4078-2762

Improving the symptomatic diagnosis of mesial occlusion — a stage of differential diagnostics of dentofacial anomalies

Authors:

Malygin Yu.M., Bednyakov A.A., Abakarov S.I., Basov A.V., Malygin A.M., Abakarova A.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2025;104(1): 42‑49

DOI: 10.17116/stomat202510401142

Read: 784 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Malygin YuM, Bednyakov AA, Abakarov SI, Basov AV, Malygin AM, Abakarova AS. Improving the symptomatic diagnosis of mesial occlusion — a stage of differential diagnostics of dentofacial anomalies. Stomatology. 2025;104(1):42‑49. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202510401142

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

THE AIM OF THE STUDY

Was to improve the quality of symptomatic diagnostics of mesial occlusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The object of our epidemiological study was 2842 schoolchildren aged 6 to 18 years, and 458 conclusions of Professor Yu. M. Malygin to patients who sought consultative assistance. The analysis of the archive of diagnostic models of jaws of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry of the Central Institute of Orthopedic Medicine and the Department of Orthodontics of the Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education in the volume of 20.000 pairs and a sample of 2490 models of jaws of patients with mesial occlusion were conducted, and then an in-depth biometric study of 205 pairs of models of jaws of patients with permanent mesial occlusion was carried out.

RESULTS

Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of mesial occlusion showed the percentage of occurrence among bite anomalies 5.6+2.03; it occurs more often in boys than in girls and more often in mixed dentition than in permanent dentition. The efficiency of determining individual types of mesial bite varied from 100% to 14%, and on average the visual diagnosis was established correctly in 44.7%. A comparative analysis of 205 pairs of jaw models with mesial bite relative to the norm showed that differences in 39 parameters out of 43 were not statistically guaranteed, so the inclinations of the anterior teeth were also studied, and then 9 typical types of mesial bite were determined using the “diagnostic key” of Yu. M. Malygin and the algorithm we developed.

CONCLUSION

An algorithm for symptomatic diagnostics has been developed, which made it possible to identify and systematize typical types of mesial bite.

Keywords:

orthodontics

mesial bite

symptomatic diagnostics

angulation of teeth

inclination of teeth

diagnostic key

Authors:

Malygin Yu.M.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0009-0002-5467-9234

Bednyakov A.A.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0009-0003-9047-7856

Abakarov S.I.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0000-0003-2369-3527

Basov A.V.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0000-0002-9339-1957

Malygin A.M.

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0009-0007-9533-3658

Abakarova A.S.

Russian University of Medicine

ORCID: 0009-0000-4078-2762

Received:

09.10.2024

Accepted:

02.12.2024

Close metadata

References:

Malygin Yu.M. Development and improvement of symptomatic diagnosis of malocclusion anomalies, Ortodont-Info, 1999;(1):2—10. (in Russ.).
Angle E.H. Malocclusion of the Teeth. — Philadelphia, The A.S. White Dental Mfg. Co., 1907.
Malygin Yu.M., Taibogarova S.S., Malygin M.Yu., Bednyakov A.A., Velieva N.I.Advantages and disadvantages of Engle’s classification of malocclusions and suggestions for their elimination. Orthodontics. 2015;3(71):2-10. (in Russ.).
Malygin Yu.M. Symptomatic diagnosis of malocclusion anomalies and their classification. Moscow: eTest, pp. 1—62 (in Russ.).
Agapov N.I. Symptomatic significance of dental anomalies, in Agapov N.I., Clinical dentistry of childhood, Moscow: MEDGIZ, pp. 323-329. (in Russ.).
Gashimov R.G., Gasimov Z.V., Saidbekov O.S. Classification of anomalies of the dental-maxillofacial system. Baku: Meditsina, p. 78. (in Russ.).
Grigorieva L.P. Classification of malocclusions in children. Poltava, p. 8.
Ilyina-Markosyan L.V. Orthodontic diagnostic methods. Diagnosis and treatment plan, in Ilyina-Markosyan L.V., Guide to orthopedic dentistry, Moscow: Meditsina, pp. 373—386. (in Russ.).
Katz A. Ya. Functional norm of dentition and functional diagnostics in orthodontics. Stomatology. 1951;(1):23-25. (in Russ.).
Kalvelis D.A. Dentoalveolar anomalies in the clinic and experiment. Leningrad: Meditsina, pp. 58-94. (in Russ.).
Kalmakarov Kh.A. Clinic and treatment of dentoalveolar anomalies in children. Tashkent: Meditsina, p. 135. (in Russ.).
Kurlyandsky V.Yu. Dental anomalies in children. Moscow: MEDGIZ, pp. 101—110. (in Russ.).
Persin L.S., Anikienko A.A. Types of dentoalveolar anomalies. Classification, in Persin L.S., Orthodontics. Moscow: Ortodont-Info, pp. 75—90. (in Russ.).
Persin L.S. Types of dentoalveolar anomalies and their classification. Moscow, p. 32. (in Russ.).
Gioeva Yu. A., Persin L.S. Mesial occlusion of dentition (clinical picture, diagnostics, treatment). Moscow: Meditsina. (in Russ.).
Khoroshilkina F.Ya. Dental, dentition, malocclusion defects, morphofunctional disorders in the maxillofacial region and their complex treatment. Moscow, pp. 109—113. (in Russ.).
Shishmareva A.S., Bimbas E.S., Menshikova E.V. The structure of dentoalveolar anomalies in children, Orthodontics, no. 2(94), pp. 4—7. (in Russ.).
Ackerman J.L., Priffit W.R., Sarver D.M., Ackerman M.B., Kean M.R. Pitch, roll and yaw: Describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits. Am. Orthod. 2007;131:305-10.
Simon P.W. Gebissanomalien. Grundzuge einer systematischen. Diagnostik der Gebissanomalien. Meusser, Berlin, 1922.
Gioeva Yu.A. Topolnitsky O.Z. Alimova A.V., Gordina E.S. Evaluation of the results of combined treatment of patients with mesial occlusion, Orthodontics. 2017;1(77):37—47. (in Russ.).
Malygin Yu.M., Velieva N.I. Malygin M.Yu., Samokhina E.S., Taibogarova S.S. Advantages and disadvantages of the Angle classification and its improvement in difficult cases, Orthodontics. 2016;2(74):66. (in Russ.).
Karpanova A.S., Arsenina O.I., Grudyanov A.I., Popova N.V., Popova A.V. Improving diagnostics in planning orthodontic treatment, Stomatology. 2018; 97(6-2):28. (in Russ.).
Malygin Yu.M. A systematic approach and system analysis are the basis of the logic of an orthodontic diagnosis, in Khoroshilkina F.Ya., Guide to orthodontics, Moscow: Meditsina, pp. 140—145. (in Russ.).
Malygin Yu.M. Theoretical substantiation of the orthodontic diagnosis and systematization of varieties of dentoalveolar anomalies, in Khoroshilkina F.Y., Frankel R., Demner L.M., Falk F., Malygin Yu.M., Frankel K., Diagnosis and functional treatment of dentoalveolar facial anomalies, Moscow: Meditsina, p. 112. (in Russ.).
Malygin Yu.M., Bednyakov A.A., Taibogarova S.S., Anosova E.S. Epidemiological characteristics of the prevalence of mesial occlusion among schoolchildren in Moscow. Orthodontics. 2014;3(67):80. (in Russ.).