Results of modified submandibular surgical approach usage for the mouth floor phlegmons treatment with respect to dynamic of local non-specific resistance

Gromov A.L.; Gubin M.A.; Shchenin A.V.; Ivanov V.I.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202210102187

Gromov A.L.

Kursk State Medical University

Gubin M.A.

Voronezh State Medical University of a name of N.N. Burdenko

Shchenin A.V.

Kursk State Medical University

Ivanov V.I.

Kursk State Medical University

Results of modified submandibular surgical approach usage for the mouth floor phlegmons treatment with respect to dynamic of local non-specific resistance

Authors:

Gromov A.L., Gubin M.A., Shchenin A.V., Ivanov V.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2022;101(2): 87‑92

DOI: 10.17116/stomat202210102187

Read: 1246 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Gromov AL, Gubin MA, Shchenin AV, Ivanov VI. Results of modified submandibular surgical approach usage for the mouth floor phlegmons treatment with respect to dynamic of local non-specific resistance. Stomatology. 2022;101(2):87‑92. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202210102187

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

THE AIM OF THE STUDY

Was increasing of treatment effectiveness of patients with mouth floor odontogenic phlegmon (MFOP) by modified of surgical approach usage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospective controlled, randomized, simple blinded clinical trial, II b level of evidence, comprised 86 patients with MFOP which formed main and control groups. The main group consisted of 40 patients treated with designed «Method for surgical treatment of odontogenic oral phlegmon of mouth floor with partial dissection of sublingual-submandibular sac». The control group involved 46 patients treated with traditional surgical procedure. The differences significance between the values has been evaluated with nonparametric Fisher’s exact P-test and parametric Student’s t-test for independent samples.

RESULTS

The modified surgical approach statistically significantly (p<0.05) decreased the number of inflammatory complications (from 26±7% to 9±4%), terms of secondary sutures application (from 7.9±1.4 to 5.7±1.6 days) and time of hospital stay (from 9.4±1.8 to 8.3±1.7 days). On the 5th day of treatment white blood cells count in the main group was significantly (p<0.05) lower (7.2±1.1·10⁹/l) than in controls (9.4±1.3·10⁹/l) showing improved intoxication syndrome resolution in the main group. Index of reaction of bacteria adsorption to the oral epithelium in the main group on the 5th day of treatment was significantly (p<0.05) higher (77.1±6.9%) than in controls (62.4±7.1%). More successful correction of local non-specific resistance was registered in the main group.

CONCLUSION

The proposed modified submandibular surgical approach is more effective for the treatment of patients with MFOP.

Keywords:

surgical approach

mouth floor phlegmon

drainage

odontogenic infection

inflammatory complications

Authors:

Gromov A.L.

Kursk State Medical University

Gubin M.A.

Voronezh State Medical University of a name of N.N. Burdenko

Shchenin A.V.

Kursk State Medical University

Ivanov V.I.

Kursk State Medical University

Received:

13.12.2021

Accepted:

25.12.2021

Close metadata

References:

Solov’ev MM, Bol’shakov OP, Galetskiy DV. Gnoyno-vospalitel’nye zabolevaniya golovy i shei: Etiologiya, patogenez, klinika, lechenie. M.: Smart doctor Publ., 2016. (In Russ.).
Kovalev V. A Severe Case of Ludwig’s Angina with a Complicated Clinical Course. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7695. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7695
Loyt AA, Kayukov AV. Khirurgicheskaya anatomiya golovy i shei. M.: MEDpresoinform Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.).
Jansisyanont P, Kasemsai W, Bamroong P. Factors related to the treatment outcome of maxillofacial fascia space infection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2015;27(4):458-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoms.2014.04.009
Dai TG, Ran HB, Qiu YX, Xu B, Cheng JQ, Liu YK. Fatal complications in a patient with severe multi-space infections in the oral and maxillofacial head and neck regions: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7(23):4150-4156. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i23.4150
Vallée M, Gaborit B, Meyer J, Malard O, Boutoille D, Raffi F, Espitalier F, Asseray N. Ludwig’s angina: A diagnostic and surgical priority. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;93:160-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.028
Edetanlen BE, Saheeb BD. Comparison of Outcomes in Conservative versus Surgical Treatments for Ludwig’s Angina. Med Princ Pract. 2018;27(4): 362-366. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490740
Hyun SY, Oh HK, Ryu JY, Kim JJ, Cho JY, Kim HM. Closed suction drainage for deep neck infections. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(6):751-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.11.006
Mahadevan M, Neeff M, Van Der Meer G, Baguley C, Wong WK, Gruber M. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial head and neck infections in children: Analysis of results and complications for various treatment modalities. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82:102-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.12.026
Gromov AL, Gubin MA, Ivanov SV, Shchenin AV, Tishkov DS. Method for surgical treatment of odontogenic oral phlegmon of mouth floor with partial dissection of sublingual-submandibular sac. Patent RF na izobretenie №2705105/17.06.19. Byul. №31. Accessed December 04, 2021. (In Russ.). https://www.fips.ru/iiss/document.xhtml?faces-redirect=true&id=e5662f27a5b0ebf55b367e898111a7bf
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche J-D, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, Poll T van der, Vincent J-L, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
Shchenin AV. Features of oral immunity indicators in patients with phlegmons of the maxillofacial region against the background of insulin-independent diabetes mellitus. Humans and their health. 2021;24(1):10-18. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2021-1/02