Manifestations of allergic reactions occurring at a dental appointment

Sabanceva E.G.; Ivanova E.V.; Rabinovich I.M.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202110006229

Sabanceva E.G.

Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Education

Ivanova E.V.

Institute for Cellular and Intracellular Symbiosis of Ural Division of RAS

ORCID: 0000-0002-4974-8947

Rabinovich I.M.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-8539-814X

Manifestations of allergic reactions occurring at a dental appointment

Authors:

Sabanceva E.G., Ivanova E.V., Rabinovich I.M.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2021;100(6‑2): 29‑32

DOI: 10.17116/stomat202110006229

Read: 11753 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Sabanceva EG, Ivanova EV, Rabinovich IM. Manifestations of allergic reactions occurring at a dental appointment. Stomatology. 2021;100(6‑2):29‑32. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202110006229

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the data of modern scientific literature to conduct a study on identifying the true allergic reaction at a dental appointment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The article is based on the study of materials from domestic and foreign research databases eLibrary, PubMed, Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. The research period is 15 years.

RESULTS

Among dental materials, the most common allergens are local anesthetics, metal alloys, components of composite materials, latex.

CONCLUSION

If allergy is suspected, it is necessary to carefully collect an anamnesis and conduct a clinical examination of the patient with the involvement of specialist doctors, with the recommendation of skin tests and test subcutaneous provocation.

Keywords:

allergy

anaphylactic shock

local anesthesia

local anesthetic

filling materials

latex

nickel-titanium

methyl methacrylate

orthodontic constructions

Authors:

Sabanceva E.G.

Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Education

Ivanova E.V.

Institute for Cellular and Intracellular Symbiosis of Ural Division of RAS

ORCID: 0000-0002-4974-8947

Rabinovich I.M.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-8539-814X

Received:

08.11.2021

Accepted:

24.11.2021

Close metadata

References:

Khamaysi Z, Bergman R, Weltfriend S. Positive patch test reactions to allergens of the dental series and the relation to the clinical presentations. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55(4):216-218.
Kal BI, Evcin O, Dundar N, Tezel H, Unal I. An unusual case of immediate hypersensitivity reaction associated with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J. 2008;205(10):547-550.
Lugović-Mihić L, Ilić I, Budimir J, Pondeljak N, Mravak Stipetić M. Common allergies and allergens in oral and perioral diseases. Acta Clin Croat. 2020;59(2):318-328. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2020.59.02.16
Bains VK, Loomba K, Loomba A, Bains R. Mercury sensitisation: review, relevance and a clinical report. Br Dent J. 2008;205(7):373-378.
Meena Syed, Radhika Chopra, Vinod Sachdev Allergic Reactions to Dental Materials A Systematic Review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(10):ZE04-ZE09. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/15640.6589
Kanerva L, Lahtinen A, Toikkanen J, et al. Increase in occupational skin diseases of dental personnel. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:104-108.
Alanko K, Susitaival P, Jolanki R, Kanerva L. Occupational skin diseases among dental nurses. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50:77-82.
Hamann CP, Rodgers PA, Sullivan KM. Occupational allergens in dentistry. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;4(5):403-409.
Clayton TH, Wilkinson SM, Rawcliffe C, Pollock B, Clark SM. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. centre. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154(1):114-117.
Noble J, Ahing SI, Karaiskos NE, Wiltshire WA. Nickel allergy and orthodontics,a review and report of two cases. Br Dent J. 2008;204(6):297-300.
Duarte I, Amorim JR, Perázzio EF, Schmitz Junior R. Metal contact dermatitis:prevalence to nickel, cobalt and chromium. An Bras Dermatol. 2005; 80(2):137-142.
Sicilia A, Cuesta S, Coma G, et al. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients:a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(8):823-835.
Müller K, Valentine-Thon E. Hypersensitivity to titanium: clinical and laboratory evidence. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 2006;27(suppl 1):31-35.
Wetter DA, Davis MD, Yiannias JA, Cheng JF, Connolly SM, el-Azhary RA, et al. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998—2000. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(3):416-421.
Marquardt W, Seiss M, Hickel R, Reichl FX. Volatile methacrylates in dental practices. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(2):101-107.
Stoeva I, Kisselova A, Zekova M. Allergic contact stomatitis from bisphenolA-glycidyldimethacrylate during application of composite restorations. A case report. J IMAB-Ann Proc. 2008;2:45-46.
Johns DA, Hemaraj S, Varoli RK. Allergic contact stomatitis from bisphenol-aglycidyldimethacrylate during application of composite restorations: A case report. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25(2):266-268.
Goon AT, Isaksson M, Zimerson E, Goh CL, Bruze M. Contact allergy to (meth) acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reactions patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55(4):219-226.
Hallstrom U. Adverse reaction to a fissure sealant. Report of a case. J Dent Child. 1993;60(2):143-146.
Tas E, Pletscher M, Bircher AJ. IgE mediated urticaria from formaldehyde in a dental root canal compound. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2002; 12(2):130-133.
Haïkel Y, Braun JJ, Zana H, Boukari A, de Blay F, Pauli G. Anaphylactic shock during endodontic treatment due to allergy to formaldehyde in a root canal sealant. J Endod. 2000;26(9):529-531.
Braun JJ, Zana H, Purohit A, Valfrey J, Scherer PH, HaBkel Y, et al. Anaphylactic reactions to formaldehyde in root canal sealant after endodontic treatment: four cases of anaphylactic shock and three of generalized urticaria. Allergy. 2003;58(11):1210-1215.
Kijima A, Nishino H, Umeda J, Kataoka Y. Type 1 allergy to formaldehyde in root canal sealant after dental treatment: two case reports and review of the literature. Arerugi. 2007;56(11):1397-1402.
Kaufman AY, Keila S. Hypersensitivity to sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 1989;15(5):224-226.
Silvestre JF, Albares MP, Blanes M, Pascual JC, Pastor N. Allergic contact gingivitis due to eugenol present in a restorative dental material. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;52(6):341.
Deshpande A, Verma S, Macwan C. Allergic Reaction Associated with the use of Eugenol Containing Dental Cement in a Young Child. Austin J Dent. 2014;1(2):1007.
Batchelor JM, Todd PM. Allergic contact stomatitis caused by a polyether dental impression material. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;63(5):296-297.
Mittermuller P, Szeimies RM, Landthaler M, Schmalz G. A rare allergy to apolyether dental impression material. Clin Oral Invest. 2012;16(4):1111-1116.
Gangemi S, Spagnolo EV, Cardia G, Minciullo PL. Fatal anaphylactic shock due to a dental impression material. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22(1):33-34.
Chin S, Ferguson J, Bajurnow T. Latex allergy in dentistry. Review and report of case presenting as a serious reaction to latex dental dam. Aus Dent J. 2004;49(3):146-148.
Al-Dosary K, Al-Qahtani A, Alangaric A. Anaphylaxis to lidocaine with tolerance to articaine in a 12 year old girl. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(3):280-2282.
Janas-Naze A, Osica P. The incidence of lidocaine allergy in dentists: an evaluation of 100 general dental practitioners. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019;32(3):333-339.
Axel Trautmann, Matthias Goebeler, Johanna Stoevesandt. Twenty Years’ Experience with Anaphylaxis-Like Reactions to Local Anesthetics: Genuine Allergy is Rare. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(6):2051-2058.e1.
Kalkan I, Buhari G, Ates H, Akdogan B, Ozdedeoglu O, Aksu K, Erkekol F. Identification of Risk Factors and Cross-Reactivity of Local Anesthetics Hypersensitivity: Analysis of 14-Years’ Experience. J Asthma Allergy. 2021; 14:47-58.
Dey M, Mishra B, Awasthi D, Sahoo A. Articaine as an alternative in lidocaine allergy: Case report of a seventy year old male patient. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;77:941-943.