The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Shalina R.I.

Kafedra akusherstva i ginekologii pediatricheskogo fakul'teta Rossiĭskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta, Moskva

Zvereva A.V.

Tsentr planirovaniia sem'i i reproduktsii Departamenta zdravookhraneniia Moskvy

Breusenko L.E.

Kafedra akusherstva i ginekologii pediatricheskogo fakul'teta Rossiĭskogo natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. N.I. Pirogova

Lukashina M.V.

Tsentr planirovaniia sem'i i reproduktsii Departamenta zdravookhraneniia Moskvy

Magnitskaia N.A.

Kafedra akusherstva i ginekologii pediatricheskogo fakul'teta Rossiĭskogo natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. N.I. Pirogova

Comparative assessment of methods for preparing the cervix uteri for labor

Authors:

Shalina R.I., Zvereva A.V., Breusenko L.E., Lukashina M.V., Magnitskaia N.A.

More about the authors

Read: 37268 times


To cite this article:

Shalina RI, Zvereva AV, Breusenko LE, Lukashina MV, Magnitskaia NA. Comparative assessment of methods for preparing the cervix uteri for labor. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2012;12(4):49‑54. (In Russ.)

Recommended articles:
Clinical and anamnestic features of rosa­cea in women in peri­menopausal period. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Vene­reology. 2025;(1):49-55

References:

  1. Radzinskii V.E. Akusherskaya agressiya. M: Mediabyuro Status Praesens 2010; 288-296, 306-317.
  2. Ben-Aroya Z., Hallak M., Segal D., Friger M., Katz M., Mazor M. Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 12: 1: 42-45.
  3. Boulvain M., Kelly A., Lohse C., Stan C., Irion O. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 4: 43-45.
  4. Bujold E., Blackwell S., Gauthier R. Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynec 2004; 103: 1: 18-23.
  5. Caliskan E., Dilbaz S., Gelisen O., Dilbaz B., Ozturk N., Haberal A. Unsuccessful labour induction in women with unfavorable cervical scores: predictors and management. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaec 2004; 44: 6: 562-567.
  6. Cole D., Bruck L. Anaphylaxis after laminaria insertion. Obstet Gynec 2000; 95: 6: 1025.
  7. Cromi A., Ghezzi F., Tomera S., Scandroglio S., Colombo G., Bolis P. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynec 2007; 196: 1: 41: 1-7.
  8. Dalui R., Suri V., Ray P., Gupta I. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Acta Obstet Gynec Scand 2005; 84: 4: 362-367.
  9. Ekele B., Isah A. Cervical ripening: how long can the Foley catheter safely remain in the cervical canal? Afr J Reprod Health 2002; 6: 3: 98-102.
  10. Guinn D.A., Davies J.K., Jones R.O., Sullivan L., Wolf D. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion. Am J Obstet Gynec 2004; 191: 1: 225-229.
  11. Heinemann J., Gillen G., Sanchez-Ramos L., Kaunitz A.M. Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynec 2008; 199: 2: 177-187; discussion 187-188.
  12. Knowles S., Djordjevic K., Binkley K., Weber E.A. Allergic anaphylaxis to Laminaria. Allergy 2002; 57: 4: 370.
  13. Lichtenberg E. Complications of osmotic dilators. Obstet Gynec Surv 2004; 59: 7: 528-536.
  14. Niromanesh S., Mosavi-Jarrahi A., Samkhaniani F. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening. Int J Gynaec Obstet 2003; 81: 1: 23-27.
  15. Siddiqui S., Zuberi N.F., Zafar A., Qureshi R.N. Increased risk of cervical canal infections with intracervical Foley catheter. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2003; 13: 3: 146-149.
  16. Surbek D., Hosli I., Holzgreve W. Current aspects of labor induction. Ther Umsch 2002; 59: 12: 650-659.
  17. Tinelli A., Tinelli R., Tinelli F. Induction of labour: which method to use? Minerva Ginecol 2003; 55: 6: 463-482.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.