The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Zinkova E.A.

Far Eastern Federal University

Sadkovskiy A.M.

Far Eastern Federal University

Koval I.P.

Far Eastern Federal University

Maslova A.D.

Far Eastern Federal University

Zarembo-Godzyatskaya O.V.

Far Eastern Federal University

Risk analysis of chromosomal abnormalities of conception products in non-developing pregnancy: assisted reproductive technologies or natural conception

Authors:

Zinkova E.A., Sadkovskiy A.M., Koval I.P., Maslova A.D., Zarembo-Godzyatskaya O.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;31(5): 89‑97

Read: 359 times


To cite this article:

Zinkova EA, Sadkovskiy AM, Koval IP, Maslova AD, Zarembo-Godzyatskaya OV. Risk analysis of chromosomal abnormalities of conception products in non-developing pregnancy: assisted reproductive technologies or natural conception. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;31(5):89‑97. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/repro20253105189

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Zinkova EA, Maslova AD, Zarembo-Godzyaczkaya OV, Kolomejceva EYu. Cytogenetic analysis of the products of conception after spontaneous abortion. Collection of materials of II Far Eastern Conference of Young Scientists «Medicine of the future». Vladivostok: Publishing House of the Far Eastern Federal University. 2023;144-148. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24866/7444-5501-9
  2. Yuan S, Guo L, Cheng D, Li X, Hu H, Hu L, Lu G, Lin G, Gong F, Tan YQ. The de novo aberration rate of prenatal karyotype was comparable between 1496 fetuses conceived via IVF/ICSI and 1396 fetuses from natural conception. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2022;39(7):1683-1689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02500-5
  3. Kushnir VA, Frattarelli JL. Aneuploidy in abortuses following IVF and ICSI. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2009; 26(2-3):93-97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9292-z
  4. Lazzari E, Potančoková M, Sobotka T, Gray E, Chambers GM. Projecting the Contribution of Assisted Reproductive Technology to Completed Cohort Fertility. Population Research and Policy Review. 2023;42(1):6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-023-09765-3
  5. Korsak VS, Smirnova AA, Shurygina OV. ART Register of RAHR, 2021. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2023;29(6):25-40. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/repro20232906125
  6. The effectiveness of the IVF procedure in the Primorsky Territory in 2019. Ministry of Health of Primorsky Krai. 2020. Accessed February 29, 2024. (In Russ.). https://www.primorsky.ru/authorities/executive-agencies/departments/health/ekstrakorporalnoe-oplodotvorenie-eko/
  7. Qin JZ, Pang LH, Li MQ, Xu J, Zhou X. Risk of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Early Spontaneous Abortion after Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e75953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075953
  8. Kuzneczova TV, Shilova NV, Tvorogova MG, Xarchenko TV, Lebedev IN, Antonenko VG. Practical recommendations for ensuring the quality and reliability of cytogenetic studies. Medical genetics. 2019;18(5):3-27. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2019.05.3-27
  9. Winter E, Wang J, Davies MJ, Norman R. Early pregnancy loss following assisted reproductive technology treatment. Human Reproduction. 2002;17(12):3220-3223. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.12.3220
  10. Zinkova EA. Risks, mechanisms and possible consequences for the health of children conceived as a result of in vitro fertilization. Collection of materials of II Far Eastern Conference of Young Scientists «Medicine of the future». Vladivostok: Publishing House of the Far Eastern Federal University. 2022;29-33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24866/7444-5302-2
  11. Zhang X, Fan J, Chen Y, Wang J, Song Z, Zhao J, Li Z, Wu X, Hu Y. Cytogenetic Analysis of the Products of Conception After Spontaneous Abortion in the First Trimester. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 2021;161(3-4):120-131.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000514088
  12. Pylyp LY, Spynenko LO, Verhoglyad NV, Mishenko AO, Mykytenko DO, Zukin VD. Chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception of first-trimester miscarriages detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis: a review of 1000 cases. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2018;35(2):265-271.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1069-1
  13. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Jaroudi S, Sarasa J, Enciso M, Wells D. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Human Genetics. 2013;132(9):1001-1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-013-1309-0
  14. Salame AA, Dahdouh EM, Aljafari R, Samuel DA, Koodathingal BP, Bajpai A, Kainoth S, Fakih M. Predictive factors of aneuploidy in infertile patients undergoing IVF: a retrospective analysis in a private IVF practice. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2024; 29(1):12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-024-00172-y
  15. Hassold TJ, Pettay D, Freeman SB, Grantham M, Takaesu N. Molecular studies of non-disjunction in trisomy 16. Journal of Medical Genetics. 1991;28(3):159-162.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.28.3.159
  16. Vičić A, Roje D, Strinić T, Stipoljev F. Trisomy 1 in an early pregnancy failure. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2008;146A(18): 2439-2441. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32481
  17. Lathi RB, Milki AA. Rate of aneuploidy in miscarriages following in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility. 2004;81(5):1270-1272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.065
  18. Martínez MC, Méndez C, Ferro J, Nicolás M, Serra V, Landeras J. Cytogenetic analysis of early nonviable pregnancies after assisted reproduction treatment. Fertility and Sterility. 2010;93(1):289-292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.989
  19. Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhao N, Liu P, Huang J. Variations in chromosomal aneuploidy rates in IVF blastocysts and early spontaneous abortion chorionic villi. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2020;37(3):527-537.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01682-9
  20. Diego-Alvarez D, Ramos-Corrales C, Garcia-Hoyos M, Bustamante-Aragones A, Cantalapiedra D, Diaz-Recasens J, Vallespin-Garcia E, Ayuso C, Lorda-Sanchez I. Double trisomy in spontaneous miscarriages: cytogenetic and molecular approach. Human Reproduction. 2006;21(4):958-966.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei406
  21. Grande M, Borrell A, Garcia-Posada R, Borobio V, Muñoz M, Creus M, Soler A, Sanchez A, Balasch J. The effect of maternal age on chromosomal anomaly rate and spectrum in recurrent miscarriage. Human Reproduction. 2012;27(10):3109-3117. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des251
  22. Cooke CM, Davidge ST. Advanced maternal age and the impact on maternal and offspring cardiovascular health. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2019;317(2):H387-H394. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00045.2019
  23. Miao YL, Kikuchi K, Sun QY, Schatten H. Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Human Reproduction Update. 2009;15(5):573-585.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp014
  24. Ferreira AF, Soares M, Almeida-Santos T, Ramalho-Santos J, Sousa AP. Aging and oocyte competence: A molecular cell perspective. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Mechanisms of Disease. 2023;15(5): e1613. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.1613
  25. Nagaoka SI, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA. Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2012;13(7):493-504.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3245
  26. Ottolini CS, Newnham L, Capalbo A, Natesan SA, Joshi HA, Cimadomo D, Griffin DK, Sage K, Summers MC, Thornhill AR, Housworth E, Herbert AD, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Handyside AH, Hoffmann ER. Genome-wide maps of recombination and chromosome segregation in human oocytes and embryos show selection for maternal recombination rates. Nature Genetics. 2015;47(7):727-735.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3306
  27. Kroon B, Harrison K, Martin N, Wong B, Yazdani A. Miscarriage karyotype and its relationship with maternal body mass index, age, and mode of conception. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;95(5):1827-1829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.065
  28. Nikitina TV, Sazhenova EA, Zhigalina DI, Tolmacheva EN, Sukhanova NN, Lebedev IN. Karyotype evaluation of repeated abortions in primary and secondary recurrent pregnancy loss. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2020;37(3):517-525.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01703-y
  29. Katagiri Y, Tamaki Y. Genetic counseling prior to assisted reproductive technology. Reproductive Medicine and Biology. 2020;20(2): 133-143.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12361
  30. Ozawa N, Ogawa K, Sasaki A, Mitsui M, Wada S, Sago H. Maternal age, history of miscarriage, and embryonic/fetal size are associated with cytogenetic results of spontaneous early miscarriages. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2019;36(4):749-757.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01415-y
  31. Recieved 19.03.2024 

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.