Bacterial vaginosis from the viewpoint of dermatology and venereology

Kisina V.I.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/klinderma20161524-8

Kisina V.I.

I.M. Sechenov Moscow Medical Academy

ORCID: 0000-0002-3761-9400

Bacterial vaginosis from the viewpoint of dermatology and venereology

Authors:

Kisina V.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2016;15(2): 4‑8

DOI: 10.17116/klinderma20161524-8

Read: 4180 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Kisina VI. Bacterial vaginosis from the viewpoint of dermatology and venereology. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2016;15(2):4‑8. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/klinderma20161524-8

Подписка 2026 Клиническая дерматология и венерология (Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Bacterial vaginosis: modern views. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2025;(3):261-268

Correction of vaginal microbiocenosis in bacterial vaginosis. Promising areas. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(4):44-50

The effect of intestinal and vaginal microflora on the risk of premature birth in pregnant women with a short cervix. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(4):66-72

Abstract:

We present literature data on the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Current information on the concept of «normal and pathological» vaginal biotope is provided and the role of different microorganisms in the etiology of bacterial vaginosis is described. Emphasis was placed on the research, whose results demonstrated the importance of biofilms formed by Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae in the development and recurrence of bacterial vaginosis. We analyzed the possibilities and prospects of the development of methods for destruction of biofilms formed by microorganisms associated with bacterial vaginosis.

Keywords:

Bacterial vaginosis

Vaginal microbiocenosis

Gardnerella vaginalis

Atopobium vaginae

Authors:

Kisina V.I.

I.M. Sechenov Moscow Medical Academy

ORCID: 0000-0002-3761-9400

Close metadata

References:

Аnkirskya АS. Bacterial vaginosis. Аkucherstvo i ginekologiya. 1995;6:13-15. (In Russian)
Priestley CJ, Kinghorn GR. Bacterial vaginosis. Br.J.Clinic.Pract. 1996; Vol.50: 6: 331-334.
Gardner H, Dukes CD. Hemophilus vaginitis a new defined specific infection vaginitis – previonsly classified, non-specific vaginitis.Am.J.Obstet.Gynecal. 955;Vol.60:962-978. (In Russian)
Мakarov ОV, Аleiukin VА, Savchenko ТN. Infekchii v akucherstve i ginekologii. М.: МЕDPRESS-inform., 2007: 462. (In Russian)
Kenyon C, Collebunders R, Cruciti T. The global epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review. Am.J.Obstet.Gynecolo. 2013; Vol.209;6: 505-523.
Lamont RF, Sobel JD, Akins RA et al. The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tract flora using vollecular based techniques. Br.J.Obstet.Gynecol. 2011; Vol.118: 5: 533-549.
Elaita NA, Tency I, Claeys G et al. Identification and genotyping of bacteria from paired vaginal and sectal samples from pregnaut women indicates similarity betwttn vaginal and rectal microflora. BMC Infect.Lis. 2009; 9: 167.
Kira ЕF. Bakterial. Vaginosis. М.: МIA, 2012: 472. (In Russian)
Bondarenko V.M., Likhoded V.T. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of endotoxemia. Lechenie i profilaktika. 2012; V.2: 3:70–76. (In Russian)
Swidsinski A, Mendling W, Loening-Baucke V et al. Adherent biofilms in bacterial species in initial attachemt and biofilm formation. Inf.J.Mol.Sci. 2013; Vol.14: 6: 12004-12012.
Evry women, every child: from commitments to action: the first report of the independent Expert Rewien Group (IERG) on information and Accountability for women’s and Childen’s Health. Geneva: WHO, 2012.
Ban Ki-moon. The Global strategy for women’s and children’s health. USA: United Nations. 2010.
Manhart LE, Khosropour M, Liu C et al. Bacteria vaginosis – Associated Bacteria in MCU: Sneathia spp. With Nongonocoecal uretritis. Sex.Trans.Dis. 2013; Vol.40: 12.
Bebear CM, de Barbeyrac B, Persyre S et al. Activity of moxifloxacin against the urogtnital mycoplasmas Ureaplasma spp., Mycoplasma hominis and Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis. Clin.Microbiol.Inftction. 2008; Vol.14: 8: 801-805.
Milani M, Barcellona E, Agnello A. Efficac y of the combination of 2 g oral tinidazole and acidic buffering vaginal gel in comparison with vaginal clindamycin alone in bacterial vaginosis: a randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled trial. Eur: J. Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; Vol.109: 1: 67-71.
Andersch B, Brandberg A, Holst E. Treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy with a lactate gel. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1990; Vol. 22; 5: 625-626.
Falagas ME, Betsi GI, Tokas T, Athanasion S. Probiotics for prenention of recurrent urinary tract inftction in wjmen: a review of the evidence from microbiological and clinical studies. Drugs. 2006; Vol.66: 9: 1253-1261.
Mastromarino P, Vitali B, Moscf L. Bacterial vaginosis: a review on clinical trials with probiotics. New Microbiol. 2013; Vol.36: 3: 229-239.
Reid G, Charbonneau D, Erb J et al. Oral use of Lactobacillus rhamnosie GR-1 and L.renteri RC-K significantly altese vaginal flora: randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 64 healthy women. Immunol.Med.Micrjbiol. 2003; Vol.35: 2: 131-134.