The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 101-59-87
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2024
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Alekberzade A.V.

Kafedra khirurgii Pervogo moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Lipnitskiĭ E.M.

Kafedra khirurgii Pervogo moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Krylov N.N.

Klinika fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii #1 lechebnogo fakul'teta Pervogo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Sundukov I.V.

Kafedra khirurgii Pervogo moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Badalov D.A.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: advantages and disadvantages

Authors:

Alekberzade A.V., Lipnitskiĭ E.M., Krylov N.N., Sundukov I.V., Badalov D.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2016;(11): 19‑24

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia20161119-24

Views: 1885

Downloaded: 39

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Alekberzade AV, Lipnitskiĭ EM, Krylov NN, Sundukov IV, Badalov DA. Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: advantages and disadvantages. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2016;(11):19‑24. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia20161119-24

Подписка 2025 (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endo­scopic ultrasound. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(1):6-11
Comparative analysis of radio-frequency abla­tion and endo­scopic suprascapular nerve deco­mpression methods in aspect of chro­nic shoulder pain treatment in adults. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2024;(2):27-34
Effi­ciency evaluation of the Neuromidin in the treatment of pain of the patients with discogenic lumbosacral radi­culopathy: resu­lts of a multicenter post-registration prospective open comparative trial. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(4):97-107
The influence of endo­metriosis on the quality of life and reproductive function of modern woman. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(5):101-107

Aim. To analyze the outcomes of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Material and methods. Early and long-term postoperative period has been analyzed in 240 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCE) including 120 cases of single-port technique and 120 cases of four-port technique. Both groups were compared in surgical time, pain syndrome severity (visual analog scale), need for analgesics, postoperative complications, hospital-stay, daily activity recovery and return to physical work, patients’ satisfaction of surgical results and their aesthetic effect. Results. It was revealed that single-port LCE is associated with lower severity of postoperative pain, quick recovery of daily activity and return to physical work, high satisfaction of surgical results and their aesthetic effect compared with four-port LCE. Disadvantages of single-port LCE include longer duration of surgery, high incidence of postoperative umbilical hernia. However hernia was predominantly observed during the period of surgical technique development. Conclusion. Further studies to standardize, evaluate the safety and benefits of single-port LCE are necessary.

Keywords:

single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
pain syndrome
cholecystitis

Authors:

Alekberzade A.V.

Kafedra khirurgii Pervogo moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Lipnitskiĭ E.M.

Kafedra khirurgii Pervogo moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Krylov N.N.

Klinika fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii #1 lechebnogo fakul'teta Pervogo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Sundukov I.V.

Kafedra khirurgii Pervogo moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.M. Sechenova

Badalov D.A.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

List of references:

  1. Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A. Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(9):1790-1801. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1956-9
  2. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli Set al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84(5):695. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02586.x
  3. Bresadola F, Pasqualucci A, Donini A et al. Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg. 1999;165(1):29-34. doi: 10.1080/110241599750007478
  4. Piskun G, Rajpal S. Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9(4):361-364. doi: 10.1089/lap.1999.9.361
  5. Gerbali OYu, Puchkov KV, Puchkov DK. Sravnitel'nye aspekty primeneniya edinogo laparoskopicheskogo i tradicionnogo laparoskopicheskogo dostupa pri lechenii simul'tannyh zabolevanij organov bryushnoj polosti. Moskovskij hirurgicheskij zhurnal.2015;(2):17-20. (In Russ.).
  6. Puchkov KV, Puchkov DK, Hubezov DA. Laparoskopicheskay aholecist`ektomiya s primeneniem metodiki edinogo laparoskopicheskogo dostupa. Novyj metod lecheniya hronicheskoj zhelchekamennoj boleznii polipoza zhelchnogo puzyrya. Kubanskij nauchnyj medicinskij vestnik. 2013;(5):155-160. (In Russ.).
  7. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(8):1842-1848. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3
  8. Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS et al. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97(7):1007-1012. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7087
  9. Aprea G, Coppola Bottazzi E, Guida F et al. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. J Surg Res. 2011;166(2):109-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.885
  10. Zheng M, Qin M, Zhao H. Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21(2):113-117. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2011.577787
  11. Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg. 2011;201(3):369-372. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.012
  12. Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;254(1):22-27. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182192f89
  13. Lirici MM, Califano AD, Angelini P, Corcione F. Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2011;202(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.019
  14. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN et al. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2011;202(3):254-258. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009
  15. Cao ZG, Cai W, Qin MF et al. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011;21(5):311-313. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822cfacd
  16. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2011;98(12):1695-1702. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7689
  17. Asakuma M, Hayashi M, Komeda K et al. Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain. Br J Surg. 2011;98(7):991-995. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7486
  18. Sinan H, Demirbas S, Ozer MT et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(1):12-16. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182402448
  19. Mühe E. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy. 1992;24(9):754-758. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1009119
  20. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; 18;(4):CD006231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006231
  21. Esposito C. One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(2):177-178. doi: 10.1007/s004649900624
  22. Solomon D, Bell RL, Duffy AJ, Roberts KE. Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):2954-2957. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1070-6
  23. Ching Li L, Ming-Te H, Soul-Chin C et al. Initial experience of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video). Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20(4):243-246. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181e9bbeb
  24. Fronza JS, Linn JG, Nagle AP, Soper NJ. A single institution's experience with single incision cholecystectomy compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2010;148(4):731-734. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.015
  25. Chang SK, Tay CW, Bicol RA et al. A case-control study of single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2011;35(2):289-293. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0842-4
  26. Pfluke JM, Parker M, Stauffer JA et al. Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(1):113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.008
  27. Prasad A, Mukherjee KA, Kaul S, Kaur M. Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: Conventional laparoscopy versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2011;7(1):24-27. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.72370
  28. Shussman N, Schlager A, Elazary R et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned for success. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):404-407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1179-7
  29. Hodgett SE, Hernandez JM, Morton CA et al. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(2):188-192. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0735-0
  30. Allemann P, Schafer M, Demartines N. Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97(10):1476-1480. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7189

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register


We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.