Immediate results of abdominal aortic replacement via mini-laparotomy in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms

Gubarev I.A.; Salekh A.Z.; Frolov K.B.; Rybakov K.N.; Belov Yu.V.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio20201301124

Gubarev I.A.

Clinic of Aortic and Cardiovascular Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Salekh A.Z.

GBOU VPO Pervyĭ MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova, Universitetskaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa #1, Klinika aortal'noĭ i serdechno-sosudistoĭ khirurgii, Moskva

Frolov K.B.

GBOU VPO Pervyĭ MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova, Universitetskaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa #1, Klinika aortal'noĭ i serdechno-sosudistoĭ khirurgii, Moskva

Rybakov K.N.

Pirogov Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 1, Moscow, Russia

Belov Yu.V.

RNTsKh im. akad. B.V. Petrovskogo RAMN

SPIN RSCI: 2740-1439
Scopus AuthorID: 7101862336
ResearcherID: 7101862336
ORCID: 0000-0002-9280-8845

Immediate results of abdominal aortic replacement via mini-laparotomy in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms

Authors:

Gubarev I.A., Salekh A.Z., Frolov K.B., Rybakov K.N., Belov Yu.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;13(1): 24‑28

DOI: 10.17116/kardio20201301124

Read: 1959 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Gubarev IA, Salekh AZ, Frolov KB, Rybakov KN, Belov YuV. Immediate results of abdominal aortic replacement via mini-laparotomy in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;13(1):24‑28. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio20201301124

Подписка 2026 Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия (Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Minimally invasive approaches in abdominal aortic surgery. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;(5):527-531

Fenestrated stent-graft as an option for the treatment of type I endoleak in a patient with giant abdominal aortic aneurysm. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12-2):159-165

Comparison of minimally invasive and traditional surgical treatment of extramedullary tumors of the craniovertebral junction. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2025;(5):64-70

Abstract:

Objective. To compare the results of abdominal aortic replacement via conventional laparotomy and mini-laparotomy in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Material and methods. Postoperative outcomes were analyzed in 65 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on surgical strategy (conventional laparotomy and mini-laparotomy). Results. Statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences in intraoperative data and postoperative morbidity in the study groups. Postoperative rehabilitation and length of hospital-stay were significantly less in the group of minimally invasive approach. Conclusion. Minimally invasive approach in surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms may be a good alternative to standard surgical interventions due to reduced surgical trauma, hospital-stay, treatment cost and increased turnover of the beds.

Keywords:

abdominal aortic aneurysm

minimally invasive approach

mini-laparotomy

Authors:

Gubarev I.A.

Clinic of Aortic and Cardiovascular Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Salekh A.Z.

GBOU VPO Pervyĭ MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova, Universitetskaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa #1, Klinika aortal'noĭ i serdechno-sosudistoĭ khirurgii, Moskva

Frolov K.B.

GBOU VPO Pervyĭ MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova, Universitetskaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa #1, Klinika aortal'noĭ i serdechno-sosudistoĭ khirurgii, Moskva

Rybakov K.N.

Pirogov Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 1, Moscow, Russia

Belov Yu.V.

RNTsKh im. akad. B.V. Petrovskogo RAMN

SPIN RSCI: 2740-1439
Scopus AuthorID: 7101862336
ResearcherID: 7101862336
ORCID: 0000-0002-9280-8845

Close metadata

References:

Pokrovsky AV. Diseases of the aorta and its branches. M.: Medicine; 1979:324. (In Russ.)
Steinberg I. Arteriosclerotic Abdominal Aneurysms. JAMA. 1966;195(12):1025. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1966.03100120093023
McGregor J, Pollock J, Anton H. The Value of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Scott Med J. 1975;20(3):133-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/003693307502000313
Wanhainen A, Themudo R, Ahlström H, Lind L, Johansson L. Thoracic and abdominal aortic dimension in 70-year-old men and women — A population-based whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(3):504-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.043
Sterpetti A, Schultz R, Feldhaus R, Cheng S, Peetz D. Factors influencing enlargement rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Surgical Research. 1987;43(3):211-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4804(87)90073-4
Collin J, Walton J, Araujo L, Lindsell D. Oxford screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 to 74 years. The Lancet. 1988;332(8611):613-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90649-6
Sonesson B, Länne T, Hansen F, Sandgren T. Infrarenal aortic diameter in the healthy person. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1994;8(1):89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80127-6
Gillum R. Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm in the United States. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(11):1289-1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00045-3
Scott R, Wilson N, Ashton H, Kay D. Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. British Journal of Surgery. 1995;82(8):1066-1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820821
Lindholt J, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg E. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;330(7494):750. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.82
Norman P, et al. Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ. 2004;329(7477):1259. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38272.478438.55
Ashton HA, et al. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2002;360(9345):1531-1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11522-4
Pleumeekers H, Hoes A, van der Does E, et al. Aneurysms of the Abdominal Aorta in Older Adults. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(12):1291-1299. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117596
Singh K, et al. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Population-based Study: The Tromso Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(3):236-244. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/154.3.236
Lederle FA, et al. Prevalence and Associations of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detected through Screening. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(6):441. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-6-199703150-00004
McPhee J, Hill J, Eslami M. The impact of gender on presentation, therapy, and mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001-2004. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(5):891-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.043
Pokrovsky AV, Ivandaev AS. State of cardiovascular surgery in Russia in 2017. M. 2018:66. (In Russ.)
Pokrovsky AV, Gontarenko VN. State of cardiovascular surgery in Russia in 2012. M. 2013:91. (In Russ.)
Pokrovsky AV, Gontarenko VN. State of cardiovascular surgery in Russia in 2014. M. 2015:94. (In Russ.)
Pokrovsky AV, Golovyuk AL. State of vascular surgery in the Russian Federation in 2018. M. 2019:46. (In Russ.)