The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Lasunin N.V.

Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery

Abdullaev A.N.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Cherekaev V.A.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Okishev D.N.

Burdenko Center of Neurosurgery

Grigoreva N.N.

N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery

Kozlov A.V.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Dural defect closure after resection of cranioorbital meningiomas

Authors:

Lasunin N.V., Abdullaev A.N., Cherekaev V.A., Okishev D.N., Grigoreva N.N., Kozlov A.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2023;87(2): 76‑84

DOI: 10.17116/neiro20238702176

Read: 3678 times

Download PDF (RU)
Download PDF
Contact the author
Table of contents

DURAL DEFECT CLOSURE AFTER RESECTION OF CRANIOORBITAL MENINGIOMAS
DURAL DEFECT CLOSURE AFTER RESECTION OF CRANIOORBITAL MENINGIOMAS

To cite this article:

Lasunin NV, Abdullaev AN, Cherekaev VA, Okishev DN, Grigoreva NN, Kozlov AV. Dural defect closure after resection of cranioorbital meningiomas. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2023;87(2):76‑84. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20238702176

Подписка 2025 Журнал «Вопросы нейрохирургии» имени Н.Н. Бурденко (Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Free nipple-areolar complex grafting combined with reco­nstruction for unavoidable mastectomy. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2024;(4):60-64
Mandible reco­nstruction using the Auto­plan software. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2024;(4-2):58-65
The first expe­rience of using an auto­graft from the wide fascia of the thigh for closing oroantral fistula. Stomatology. 2025;(1):17-22
Abstract:

Dural defect closure after resection of cranioorbital meningiomas has its own specifics. Extended malignant lesions and common large bone defects involving various anatomical regions require multiple implants or implants with complex geometry. The features of this stage of reconstruction were described in the previous issue of the Burdenko Journal of Neurosurgery. At the same time, contact of implant with nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses dictates additional requirements for tightness of soft tissue reconstruction and inertness of material. In this review, we describe modern and historically interesting methods of reconstruction of soft tissue defects following resection of cranioorbital meningioma.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and analyze available literature data on reconstruction of soft tissue defects following resection of cranioorbital meningioma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors reviewed available data on reconstruction of soft tissue defects after resection of cranioorbital meningiomas. Effectiveness of reconstruction techniques and safety of materials were analyzed.

RESULTS

The authors analyzed 42 available full-text articles. Features of growth and natural course of cranioorbital meningioma, methods of soft tissue defects closure, modern materials and sealing compositions are described. Considering these data, the authors proposed the algorithms for selecting materials for dural reconstruction after resection of cranioorbital meningioma.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of surgical technique, development of new materials and technologies increase the efficiency and safety of dural defect closure. Nevertheless, high incidence of complications associated with dura mater repair necessitates further research in this area.

Keywords:

cranioorbital meningioma
reconstruction
dura mater
soft tissue defect
surgical defect

Authors:

Lasunin N.V.

Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery

Abdullaev A.N.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Cherekaev V.A.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Okishev D.N.

Burdenko Center of Neurosurgery

Grigoreva N.N.

N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery

Kozlov A.V.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Received:

12.09.2022

Accepted:

27.01.2023

Close metadata

References:

  1. Menon SOS, Anand D, Menon G. Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas: Optimizing Visual Outcome. Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. 2020;11(3):385-394.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709270
  2. Forster MT, Daneshvar K, Senft C, Seifert V, Marquardt G. Sphenoorbital meningiomas: surgical management and outcome. Neurological research. 2014;36(8):695-700.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000329
  3. Cherekaev VA, Belov AI, Vinokurov AG. Hirurgija giperostoticheskih kranioorbital’nyh meningiom. Pod red. Konovalova A.N. M. 2005. (In Russ.).
  4. Bikmaz K, Mrak R, Al-Mefty O. Management of bone-invasive, hyperostotic sphenoid wing meningiomas. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2007;107(5):905-912.  https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS-07/11/0905
  5. Scarone P, Leclerq D, Héran F, Robert G. Long-term results with exophthalmos in a surgical series of 30 sphenoorbital meningiomas. Clinical article. Journal of neurosurgery. 2009;111(5):1069-1077. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.1.JNS081263
  6. Forster MT, Daneshvar K, Senft C, Seifert V, Marquardt G. Sphenoorbital meningiomas: surgical management and outcome. Neurological research. 2014;36(8):695-700.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000329
  7. Gonen L, Nov E, Shimony N, Shofty B, Margalit N. Sphenoorbital meningioma: surgical series and design of an intraoperative management algorithm. Neurosurgical review. 2018;41(1):291-301.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0855-7
  8. Belov AI. Plasticheskoe zakry’tie defektov posle udaleniya opukholej kraniofaczial’nogo rasprostraneniya: Dis. ... kand. med. nauk. M. 2000. (In Russ.).
  9. Santamarta D, Blázquez JA, Maillo A, Muñoz A, Caballero M, Morales F. Análisis de complicaciones licuorales (hidrocefalia, fistula, pseudomeningocele e infeccion) en la cirugía de tumores de fosa posterior [Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid related complications (hydrocephalus, fistula, pseudomeningocele and infection) following surgery for posterior fossa tumors]. Neurocirugia. 2003;14(2):117-126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1130-1473(03)70548-x
  10. Samotokin BA. Otkrytye povrezhdenija cherepa i golovnogo mozga. V kn.: Shamov VN, redaktor. Hirurgija povrezhdeniĭ nervnoĭ sistemy. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. L.: Medgiz; 1959;181-182. (In Russ.).
  11. Morales-Avalos R, Soto-Domínguez A, García-Juárez J, Saucedo-Cardenas O, Bonilla-Galvan JR, Cardenas-Serna M, Guzmán-López S, Elizondo-Omaña RE. Characterization and morphological comparison of human dura mater, temporalis fascia, and pericranium for the correct selection of an autograft in duraplasty procedures. Surgical and radiologic anatomy. 2017;39(1):29-38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1692-z
  12. Gol’bin DA, Lasunin NV. The first experience of skull base defect reconstruction using pedicled buccal fat pad after endoscopic endonasal resection of a craniofacial tumor. Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery. 2013;77(2):44-49. (In Russ.).
  13. Cherekaev VA, Gol’bin DA, Belov AI, Borodin VV. Plastic surgery of defects in the anterior and middle parts of the skull base using displaced buccal fat body. Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery. 2010;4:3-10. (In Russ.).
  14. Parízek J, Maricka P, Husek Z, Suba P, Spacek J, Nimecek S, Nimecková J, Sercl M, Eliás P. Detailed evaluation of 2959 allogeneic and xenogeneic dense connective tissue grafts (fascia lata, pericardium, and dura mater) used in the course of 20 years for duraplasty in neurosurgery. Acta neurochirurgica. 1997;139(9):827-838.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01411400
  15. Chaplin JM, Costantino PD, Wolpoe ME, Bederson JB, Griffey ES, Zhang WX. Use of an acellular dermal allograft for dural replacement: an experimental study. Neurosurgery. 1999;45(2):320-327.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199908000-00025
  16. Costantino PD, Wolpoe ME, Govindaraj S, Chaplin JM, Sen C, Cohen M, Gnoy A. Human dural replacement with acellular dermis: clinical results and a review of the literature. Head & neck. 2000;22(8):765-771. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0347(200012)22:8<765::aid-hed4>3.0.co;2-7 "> 3.0.co;2-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0347(200012)22:8<765::aid-hed4>3.0.co;2-7
  17. Sakai K, Hamaguchi T, Noguchi-Shinohara M, Nozaki I, Takumi I, Sanjo N, Nakamura Y, Kitamoto T, Saito N, Mizusawa H, Yamada M. Graft-related disease progression in dura mater graft-associated Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2013;3(8):e003400. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003400
  18. Fairbairn NG, Randolph MA, Redmond RW. The clinical applications of human amnion in plastic surgery. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2014;67(5):662-675. 
  19. Zerris VA, James KS, Roberts JB, Bell E, Heilman CB. Repair of the dura mater with processed collagen devices. Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B. Applied biomaterials. 2007;83(2):580-588.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30831
  20. Narotam PK, Qiao F, Nathoo N. Collagen matrix duraplasty for posterior fossa surgery: evaluation of surgical technique in 52 adult patients. Clinical article. Journal of neurosurgery. 2009;111(2):380-386.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.10.JNS08993
  21. Zinoviev PD, Baulin AV, Venediktov AA. Plasty of a dura mater defect with the Cardioplant endoprosthesis: an experimental study. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovanii. 2015;3:198-200. (In Russ.).
  22. Sun H, Wang H, Diao Y, Tu Y, Li X, Zhao W, Ren J, Zhang S. Large retrospective study of artificial dura substitute in patients with traumatic brain injury undergo decompressive craniectomy. Brain and behavior. 2018;8(5):e00907. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.907
  23. Warren WL, Medary MB, Dureza CD, Bellotte JB, Flannagan PP, Oh MY, Fukushima T. Dural repair using acellular human dermis: experience with 200 cases: technique assessment. Neurosurgery. 2000;46(6):1391-1396. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200006000-00020
  24. Zerris VA, James KS, Roberts JB, Bell E, Heilman CB. Repair of the dura mater with processed collagen devices. Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B. Applied biomaterials. 2007;83(2):580-588.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30831
  25. Sade B, Oya S, Lee JH. Non-watertight dural reconstruction in meningioma surgery: results in 439 consecutive patients and a review of the literature. Clinical article. Journal of neurosurgery. 2011;114(3):714-718.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.7.JNS10460
  26. Esposito F, Cappabianca P, Fusco M, Cavallo LM, Bani GG, Biroli F, Sparano A, de Divitiis O, Signorelli A. Collagen-only biomatrix as a novel dural substitute. Examination of the efficacy, safety and outcome: clinical experience on a series of 208 patients. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2008;110(4):343-351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.12.016
  27. Nagata K, Shiobara Y, Kobayashi H, Shiba T, Yanagisawa A, Maruyama S. No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery. 1999;27(12):1097-1103.
  28. Matsumoto Y, Aikawa H, Tsutsumi M, Narita S, Yoshida H, Etou H, Sakamoto K, Kazekawa K. Histological examination of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene artificial dura mater at 14 years after craniotomy: case report. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 2013;53(1):43-46.  https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.53.43
  29. Malliti M, Page P, Gury C, Chomette E, Nataf F, Roux FX. Comparison of deep wound infection rates using a synthetic dural substitute (neuro-patch) or pericranium graft for dural closure: a clinical review of 1 year. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(3):599-604.  https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000108640.45371.1a
  30. Maurer PK, McDonald JV. Vicryl (polyglactin 910) mesh as a dural substitute. Journal of neurosurgery. 1985;63(3):448-452.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.63.3.0448
  31. von Wild KR. Examination of the safety and efficacy of an absorbable dura mater substitute (Dura Patch) in normal applications in neurosurgery. Surgical neurology. 1999;52(4):418-425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(99)00125-1
  32. Suwanprateeb J, Luangwattanawilai T, Theeranattapong T, Suvannapruk W, Chumnanvej S, Hemstapat W. Bilayer oxidized regenerated cellulose/poly ε-caprolactone knitted fabric-reinforced composite for use as an artificial dural substitute. Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine. 2016;27(7):122.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-016-5736-z
  33. Goldschmidt E, Cacicedo M, Kornfeld S, Valinoti M, Ielpi M, Ajler PM, Yampolsky C, Rasmussen J, Castro GR, Argibay P. Construction and in vitro testing of a cellulose dura mater graft. Neurological research. 2016;38(1):25-31.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2015.1122263
  34. Dhillon S. Fibrin sealant (evicel [quixil/crosseal]): a review of its use as supportive treatment for haemostasis in surgery. Drugs. 2011;71(14):1893-1915. https://doi.org/10.2165/11207700-000000000-00000
  35. Berguer R, Staerkel RL, Moore EE, Moore FA, Galloway WB, Mockus MB. Warning: fatal reaction to the use of fibrin glue in deep hepatic wounds. Case reports. The Journal of trauma. 1991;31(3):408-411. 
  36. Esposito F, Angileri FF, Kruse P, Cavallo LM, Solari D, Esposito V, Tomasello F, Cappabianca P. Fibrin Sealants in Dura Sealing: A Systematic Literature Review. PloS one. 2016;11(4):e0151533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151533
  37. Gorsky VA, Zryanin AM, Agapov MA. Efficiency of using TachoComb in hepatobiliary surgery. Sovremennyye tekhnologii v meditsine. 2011;2:61-68. (In Russ.).
  38. Mita K, Ito H, Murabayashi R, Asakawa H, Nabetani M, Kamasako A, Koizumi K, Hayashi T. Use of a Fibrinogen/Thrombin-Based Collagen Fleece (TachoComb, TachoSil) With a Stapled Closure to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula Formation Following Distal Pancreatectomy. Surgical innovation. 2015;22(6):601-605.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350615580649
  39. Assessment report EMA/216119/2016 TachoSil. European Medicines Agency; 2016;46. 
  40. von der Brelie C, Soehle M, Clusmann HR. Intraoperative sealing of dura mater defects with a novel, synthetic, self adhesive patch: application experience in 25 patients. British journal of neurosurgery. 2012;26(2):231-235.  https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2011.619597
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.