The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Khit' M.A.

NII neĭrokhirurgii im. akad. N.N. Burdenko RAMN, Moskva

Gushcha A.O.

Neurology Research Center, Moscow

Shchekut'ev G.A.

FGBU "NII neĭrokhirurgii im. akad. N.N. Burdenko" RAMN

Nikitin S.S.

GU NII OPiPF RAMN, Moskva

Cervical spondylogenic myelopathy: evaluation, treatment, prognosis

Authors:

Khit' M.A., Gushcha A.O., Shchekut'ev G.A., Nikitin S.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2012;76(3): 75‑80

Read: 14813 times


To cite this article:

Khit' MA, Gushcha AO, Shchekut'ev GA, Nikitin SS. Cervical spondylogenic myelopathy: evaluation, treatment, prognosis. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2012;76(3):75‑80. (In Russ.)

Recommended articles:
«Brain—gut—microbiome» axis in patients with Parkinson’s disease. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(11-2):18-23

References:

  1. Gekht B.M. i dr. Elektromiografiya v diagnostike nervno-myshechnykh zabolevanii. Tartu 1997; 370.
  2. Gnezditskii V.V. Vyzvannye potentsialy mozga v klinicheskoi praktike. M: MEDpress-inform 2003; 264.
  3. Gushcha A.O. Diagnostika i khirurgicheskoe lechenie degenerativnykh kompressionnykh sindromov na urovne sheinogo otdela pozvonochnika: Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra med. nauk. M 2007; 406.
  4. Zavalishin I.L. i dr. Bokovoi amiotroficheskii skleroz. Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei. M: Evraziya+ 2007.
  5. Nikitin S.S., Kurenkov A.L. Metodicheskie osnovy transkranial'noi magnitnoi stimulyatsii v nevrologii i psikhiatrii. Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei. M 2006; 178.
  6. Shevelev I.N., Gushcha A.O. Degenerativno-distroficheskie zabolevaniya sheinogo otdela pozvonochnika. M: ABV-Press 2008; 176.
  7. Agrawal S.K., Theriault E., Fehlings M.G. Role of group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors in traumatic spinal cord white matter injury. J Neurotrauma 1998; 15: 11: 929-941.
  8. Ahdab R. et al. Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy presenting as dropped head syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009; 111: 10: 874-876.
  9. al-Mefty O. et al. Experimental chronic compressive cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg 1993; 79: 4: 550-561.
  10. Bell G.R., Ross J.S. Diagnosis of nerve root compression. Myelography, computed tomography, and MRI. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23: 3: 405-419.
  11. Benzel E.C. et al. Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Dis 1991; 4: 3: 286-295.
  12. Berger J.R., Sabet A. Infectious myelopathies. Semin Neurol 2002; 22: 2: 133-142.
  13. Caragine L.P.Jr. et al. Vascular myelopathies-vascular malformations of the spinal cord: presentation and endovascular surgical management. Semin Neurol 2002; 22: 2: 123-132.
  14. Chen R et al. The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 3: 504-532.
  15. Chiles B.W.3rd et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 1999; 44: 4: 762-769; discussion 769-770.
  16. Chistyakov A.V. et al. The value of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in evaluation of cervical myelopathy in the presence of peripheral neuropathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004; 29: 12: E239-E247.
  17. Clark C.R. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: history and physical findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988; 13: 7: 847-849.
  18. Clifton A.G. et al. Identifiable causes for poor outcome in surgery for cervical spondylosis. Post-operative computed myelography and MR imaging. Neuroradiology 1990; 32: 6: 450-455.
  19. Cracco R.Q., Cracco J.B. Somatosensory evoked potential in man: for field potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1976; 41: 5: 460-466.
  20. Day B.L. et al. Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2 Multiple descending volleys. Brain 1987; 110: Pt 5: 1191-1209.
  21. Doppman J.L. The mechanism of ischemia in anteroposterior compression of the spinal cord. Invest Radiol 1975; 10: 6: 543-551.
  22. Ebara S. et al. Myelopathy hand characterized by muscle wasting. A different type of myelopathy hand, in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988; 13: 7: 785-791.
  23. Emerson R.G., Pedley T.A. Effect of cervical spinal cord lesions on early components of the median nerve somatosensory evoked potential. Neurology 1986; 36: 1: 20-26.
  24. Emery S.E. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001; 9: 6: 376-388.
  25. Firooznia H. et al. Sudden quadriplegia after a minor trauma. The role of preexisting spinal stenosis. Surg Neurol 1985; 23: 2: 165-168.
  26. Fouyas I.P., Statham P.F., Sandercock P.A. Cochrane review on the role of surgery in cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 7: 736-747.
  27. Furlan J.C. et al. Functional and clinical outcomes following surgical treatment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of 81 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 14: 3: 348-355.
  28. Hess C.W., Mills K.R., Murray N.M. Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. J Physiol 1987; 388: 397-419.
  29. Holly L.T. et al. Clinical prognostic indicators of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11: 2:112-118.
  30. Kadanka Z. et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative veisurgical treatment after 10 years. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 9: 1533-1538.
  31. Kadanka Z. et al. Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 20: 2205-2210; discussion 2210-2211.
  32. Kalupahana N.S. et al. Abnormal parameters of magnetically evoked motor-evoked potentials in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 2008; 8: 4: 645-649.
  33. Kaneko K. et al. Mechanism of prolonged central motor conduction time in compressive cervical myelopathy. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 6: 1035-1040.
  34. King J.T. Jr., McGinnis K.A., Roberts M.S. Quality of life assessment with the medical outcomes study short form-36 among patients with cervical spondylotie myelopathy. Neurosurgery 2003; 52: 1:113-120; discussion 121.
  35. Kumaresan S. et al. Contribution of disc degeneration to osteophyte formation in the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation. J Orthop Res 2001; 19: 5: 977-984.
  36. LaRocca H. Cervical spondylotie myelopathy: natural history. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988; 13: 7: 854-855.
  37. Lees F., Turner J.W. Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. Br Med J 1963; 2: 5373: 1607-1610.
  38. Lo Y.L. et al. Systematic correlation of transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 10: 1137-1145.
  39. Lo Y.L. et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation screening for cord compression in cervical spondylosis. J Neurol Sci 2006; 244: 1-2: 17-21.
  40. Mauguiere F., Ibanez V. The dissociation of early SEP components in lesions of the cervico-medullary junction: a cue for routine interpretation of abnormal cervical responses to median nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 6: 406-420.
  41. Mauguiere F., Restuccia D. Inadequacy of the forehead reference montage for detecting abnormalities of the spinal N13 SEP in cervical cord lesions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 79: 6: 448-456.
  42. McCormack B.M., Weinstein P.R. Cervical spondylosis. An update West J Med 1996; 165: 1-2: 43-51.
  43. McCormick W.E., Steinmetz M.P., Benzel E.C. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: make the difficult diagnosis, then refer for surgery. Cleve Clin J Med 2003; 70: 10: 899-904.
  44. Montgomery D.M., Brower R.S. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinical syndrome and natural history. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23: 3: 487-493.
  45. Moore A.P., Blumhardt L.D. A prospective survey of the causes of non-traumatic spastic paraparesis and tetraparesis in 585 patients. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 6: 361-367.
  46. Nakanishi K. et al. Corticospinal tract conduction block results in the prolongation of central motor conduction time in compressive cervical myelopathy. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 3: 623-627.
  47. Nakanishi K. et al. Significant correlation between corticospinal tract conduction block and prolongation of central motor conduction time in compressive cervical mvelopathy. J Neurol Sci 2007; 256: 1-2: 71-74.
  48. Ogino H. et al. Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8: 1: 1-15.
  49. Olive P.M., Whitecloud T.S., Bennett J.T. Lower cervical spondylosis and myelopathy in adults with Down's syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988; 13: 7: 781-784.
  50. Perlik S.J., Fisher M.A. Somatosensory evoked response evaluation of cervical spondylytic myelopathy. Muscle Nerve 1987; 10: 6: 481-489.
  51. Rao R. Neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, and cervical myelopathy: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical evaluation. Instr Course Lect 2003; 52: 479-488.
  52. Restuccia D. et al. The role of upper limb somatosensory evoked potentials in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: preliminary data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 92: 6: 502-509.
  53. Restuccia D., Mauguiere F. The contribution of median nerve SEPs in the functional assessment of the cervical spinal cord in syringomyelia. A study of 24 patients. Brain 1991; 114: Pt IB: 361-379.
  54. Restuccia D. et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials after multisegmental upper limb stimulation in diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1994; 57: 3: 301-308.
  55. Rowland L.P. Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: time for a controlled trial. Neurology 1992; 42: 1: 5-13.
  56. Sampath P. et al. Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy. A prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 6: 670-676.
  57. Simo M., Szirmai I., Aranyi Z. Superior sensitivity of motor over somatosensory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur J Neurol 2004; 11: 9: 621-626.
  58. Teresi L.M. et al. Asymptomatic degenerative disk disease and spondylosis of the cervical spine: MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 164: 1: 83-88.
  59. Tracy J.A., Bartleson J.D. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist 2010; 16: 3: 176-187.
  60. Turano G. et al. Correlation of SEP abnormalities with brain and cervical cord MRI in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1991; 114: Pt 1B: 663-681.
  61. Yamada T. et al. Clinical correlates of abnormal P14 in median SEPs. Neurology 1986; 36: 6: 765-771.
  62. Yamaura I. et al. Mechanism of destructive pathologic changes in the spinal cord under chronic mechanical compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 1: 21-26.
  63. Yonenobu K. et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001: 26: 17: 1890-1894: discussion 1895.
  64. Yoo K., Origitano T.C. Familial cervical spondylosis. Case report. J Neurosurg 1998; 89: 1: 139-141.
  65. Young W.F. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in older persons. Am Fam Phys 2000; 62: 5: 1064-1070, 1073.
  66. Young W.F., Weaver M., Mishra B. Surgical outcome in patients with coexisting multiple sclerosis and spondylosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1999; 100: 2: 84-87.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.