The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Maliugin B.É.

FGBU "MNTK "Mikrokhirurgiia glaza" im. akad. S.N. Fedorova Rosmedtekhnologiĭ", Moskva

Sobolev N.P.

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, 59a Beskudnikovskiy blvd, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127486

Fomina O.V.

S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center «MNTK 'Eye Microsurgery', 59A Beskudnikovsky Blvd., Moscow, Russian Federation, 127486

Belokopytov A.V.

A.A. Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, 19 Bolshoy Karetny per., bld. 1, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127051

Comparative analysis of the functional results after implantation of various diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses

Authors:

Maliugin B.É., Sobolev N.P., Fomina O.V., Belokopytov A.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(1): 80‑89

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202013601180

Read: 7515 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AFTER IMPLANTATION OF VARIOUS DIFFRACTIVE TRIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AFTER IMPLANTATION OF VARIOUS DIFFRACTIVE TRIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES

To cite this article:

Maliugin BÉ, Sobolev NP, Fomina OV, Belokopytov AV. Comparative analysis of the functional results after implantation of various diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(1):80‑89. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202013601180

Подписка 2026 Вестник офтальмологии (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Current approaches to improving the effe­ctiveness of multifocal and exte­nded depth of focus intraocular lenses. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(4):110-116
Choice of treatment stra­tegy for corneal opacities in patients with muco­polysaccharidosis type VI. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(6):102-108
Mole­cular diagnostic biomarkers of subretinal fluid in asse­ssing the seve­rity and prognosis of rhegmatogenous reti­nal deta­chment. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(6):119-126
Search for neurophysiological markers of schi­zophrenia spectrum diso­rders: ocular microtremor and contrast sensitivity. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(12):228-236
Abstract:

Purpose – to compare visual outcomes after implantation of two models of diffractive trifocal IOLs using various vision assessment systems. Material and methods. The study included 25 patients (25 eyes) who were implanted with AcrySof IQ PanOptix (TFN) and 25 patients (25 eyes) implanted with AT LISA tri 839 MP (TRI). Postoperative examination at 1 year included assessment of monocular visual acuity for far, intermediate and near distance using decimal scale, as well as LogMAR and an interactive computer program (ICP). Contrast sensitivity was assessed with the Optec 6500 device. A questionnaire was used to evaluate subjective quality of vision and the intensity of optical phenomena. Results. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at distance, intermediate and near was better in the TFN group in comparison with the TRI group as measured with decimal scale, ICP and LogMAR. Under photopic and mesopic conditions with and without glare, at all spatial frequencies the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was higher after implantation of TFN in comparison with TRI. The average VF-14 score was 97.2 after implantation of TFN and 96.7 after implantation of TRI. The amount of patients who required spectacle correction after the surgery was 5.5% less in the TFN group compared to the TRI group. Conclusion. High visual outcomes at all distances were observed in patients after implantation of both trifocal IOLs with TFN showing a slight advantage. Evaluation of the visual outcomes using various systems showed the benefits of the ICP assessment. The CSF had typical configuration with maximum value in the mid-range region and a decrease in the high-frequency range after implantation of both IOLs, however the indicators were better in the TFN group. The postoperative period was characterized by high levels of patient satisfaction and spectacle independence in both groups.

Keywords:

visual acuity
optotypes
interactive computer program
contrast sensitivity
trifocal intraocular lens
multifocal intraocular lens
cataract surgery

Authors:

Maliugin B.É.

FGBU "MNTK "Mikrokhirurgiia glaza" im. akad. S.N. Fedorova Rosmedtekhnologiĭ", Moskva

Sobolev N.P.

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, 59a Beskudnikovskiy blvd, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127486

Fomina O.V.

S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center «MNTK 'Eye Microsurgery', 59A Beskudnikovsky Blvd., Moscow, Russian Federation, 127486

Belokopytov A.V.

A.A. Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, 19 Bolshoy Karetny per., bld. 1, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127051

Close metadata

References:

  1. Mencucci R, Favuzza E, Caporossi O, Savastano A, Rizzo S. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(10):1913-1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4052-3
  2. Belikova EI, Borzykh VA. Results of trifocal intraocular lenses implantation in patients with cataract and presbyopia. Oftal’mologiya. 2018;15(3):248-255. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-3-248-255
  3. Malyugin BE, Sobolev NP, Fomina OV. Visual assessment performance after implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2017;4:6-14. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2017-4-6-14
  4. Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Alió Del Barrio JL, Amat-Peral P, Ortuño V, Yébana P, Al-Shymali O, Vega-Estrada A. Clinical outcomes with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28(4):419-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672118762231
  5. Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Férnandez-Buenaga R, Pikkel J, Maldonado M. Multifocal intraocular lenses: An overview. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62(5):611-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.03.005
  6. Bilbao-Calabuig R, Llovet-Rausell A, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Martínez-Del-Pozo M, Mayordomo-Cerdá F, Segura-Albentosa C, Baviera J, Llovet-Osuna F. Visual Outcomes Following Bilateral lmplantation of Two Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses in 10 084 Eyes. Am J Ophthalmol.2017;179:55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.04.013
  7. Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Trifocal intraocular lenses: a comparison of the visual performance and quality of vision provided by two different lens designs. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;8(11):1081-1087. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S136164
  8. Kohnen T. First implantation of a diffractive quadrafocal (trifocal) intraocular lens. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2015;41(10):2330-2332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.012
  9. Kohnen T, Herzog M, Hemkeppler E, Schönbrunn S, De Lorenzo N, Petermann K, Böhm M. Visual Performance of a Quadrifocal (Trifocal) Intraocular Lens Following Removal of the Crystalline Lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;184:52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.09.016
  10. Lawless M, Hodge C, Reich J. et al. Visual and refractive outcomes following implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. Eye and Vision. 2017; 4(4):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-017-0076-8
  11. Mendicute J, Kapp A, Lévy P, Krommes G, Arias-Puente A, Tomalla M, Barraquer E, Rozot P, Bouchut P. Evaluation of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(2):203-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.037
  12. Mojzis P, Majerova K, Hrckova L, Piñero DP. Implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens: one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1623-1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.11.050
  13. Monaco G, Gari M, Di Censo F. et al. Visual performance after bilateral implantation of 2 new presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: Trifocal versus extended range of vision. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2017;43(6):737-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.03.037
  14. Ruiz-Mesa R, Abengózar-Vela A, Ruiz-Santos M. A comparative study of the visual outcomes between a new trifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28(2):182-187. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5001029
  15. Vilar C, Hida WT, de Medeiros AL, Magalhães KRP, de Moraes Tzelikis PF, Chaves MAPD, Motta AFP, Carricondo PC, Alves MR, Nosé W. Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;1(11):1393-1397. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S139909
  16. Medeiros AL, de Araújo Rolim AG, Motta AFP, Ventura BV, Vilar C, Chaves MAPD, Carricondo PC, Hida WT. Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;26(11):1911-1916. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S145945
  17. Carson D, Xu Z, Alexander E, Choi M, Zhao Z, Hong X. Optical bench performance of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(9):1361-1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.036
  18. Rozhkova GI, Malykh TB. Present aspects of visiometry standardization. Aviakosmicheskaya i ekologicheskaya meditsina. 2017;51(6):5-16 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21687/0233-528X-2017-51-6-5-16
  19. Rozhkova G, Lebedev D, Gracheva M, Rychkova S. Optimal optotype structure for monitoring visual acuity. Latvian academy of sciences. 2017; 71(5):20–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/prolas-2017-0057
  20. Taylor H.R. Applying new design principles to the construction of an illiterate e chart. Optometry & Vision Science. 1978; 55(5):348–351. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197805000-00008
  21. Terekhin AP, Gracheva MA, Rozhkova GI, Lebedev DS. Svid. 2015616714 Rossiiskaya Federatsiya. Certificate of state registration of the computer program. Interactive program for visual acuity assessing based on accurate threshold measurement using three optotypes «Tip-Top»; zayavitel’ i pravoobladatel’ FGBU IPPI RAN im. A.A. Kharkevicha (RU). – № 2014619697; zayavl. 26.09.14; opubl. 19.06.15. (In Russ.). iitp.ru/ru/patents/1293.htm
  22. Lee S, Choi M, Xu Z, Zhao Z, Alexander E, Liu Y. Optical bench performance of a novel trifocal intraocular lens compared with a multifocal intraocular lens. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2016;2(10):1031-1038. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S106646
  23. Escandón-García S, Ribeiro FJ, McAlinden C, Queirós A, González-Méijome JM. Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction. J Ophthalmol. 2018;31:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6165493
  24. Cochener B, Boutillier G, Lamard M, Auberger-Zagnoli C. A Comparative Evaluation of a New Generation of Diffractive Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(8):507-514. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20180530-02
  25. Cochener B, Concerto Study Group. Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: International Multicenter Concerto Study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(9):1268-1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.033
  26. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Carballo-Alvarez J, Garcia-Bella J, Vazquez-Molini JM, Morales L, Sanz-Fernandez JC, Polo V, García-Feijoo J. Photopic and Mesopic Performance of 2 Different Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27(1):26-30. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000814
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.