The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 101-59-87
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Stulova A.N.

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, 27/1 Lomonosov Av., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991

Semenova N.S.

Fakul'tet fundamental'noĭ meditsiny Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. M.V. Lomonosova

Akopian V.S.

Fakul'tet fundamental'noĭ meditsiny Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. M.V. Lomonosova

Visual acuity assessment: historical overview and current trends

Authors:

Stulova A.N., Semenova N.S., Akopian V.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(6): 141‑146

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2019135061141

Views: 6473

Downloaded: 302

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Stulova AN, Semenova NS, Akopian VS. Visual acuity assessment: historical overview and current trends. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(6):141‑146. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2019135061141

Подписка 2025 (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Comparative analysis of clinical and functional para­meters in patients with stable stage II—III kera­toconus after implantation of corneal segments and fitting of scle­ral rigid contact lenses. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(2):72-77
Application of para­metric statistics to visual acuity data. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):70-77

The article reviews the evolution of visual acuity assessment and gives comparison of the visual acuity charts (Snellen vs. ETDRS) widely used in research and clinical practice.

Keywords:

visual acuity
Snellen chart
ETDRS chart
logMAR scale

Authors:

Stulova A.N.

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, 27/1 Lomonosov Av., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991

Semenova N.S.

Fakul'tet fundamental'noĭ meditsiny Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. M.V. Lomonosova

Akopian V.S.

Fakul'tet fundamental'noĭ meditsiny Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. M.V. Lomonosova

List of references:

  1. Elliott DB. The good (logMAR), the bad (Snellen) and the ugly (BCVA, number of letters read) of visual acuity measurement. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016;36(4):355-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12310
  2. Lovie-Kitchin JE. Is it time to confine Snellen charts to the annals of history? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35(6):631-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12252
  3. Lim LA, Frost NA, Powell RJ, Hewson P. Comparison of the ETDRS logMAR, compact reduced logMar and Snellen charts in routine clinical practice. Eye. 2010;24(4):673-677. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.147
  4. Rozhkova GI. LogMAR for visual acuity is worse than horsepower for electric lamp. Sensornye sistemy. 2017;31(1):29-41. (In Russ.)
  5. Colenbrander A. The historical evolution of visual acuity measurement. Vis Impair Res. 2008;10(2-3):57-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13882350802632401
  6. Kaiser PK. Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2009;107:311-324. https://aosonline.org/assets/xactions/2009/1545-6110_v107_p311.pdf
  7. Tidbury L, O’Connor A. Testing vision testing: quantifying the effect of movement on visual acuity measurement. Eye. 2015;29(1):129-135. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.247
  8. Tidbury L, Czanner G, Newsham D. Fiat Lux: the effect of illuminance on acuity testing. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(6):1091-1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3329-7
  9. Gibson RA, Sanderson HF. Observer variation in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980;64(6):457-460. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.64.6.457
  10. Ferris FL, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New Visual Acuity Charts for Clinical Research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94(1):91-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(82)90197-0
  11. Bailey IL, Lovie-Kitchin JE. Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic. Vision Res. 2013;90:2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.05.004
  12. Tewari HK, Kori V, Sony P, Venkatesh P, Garg S. Snellen chart may be preferable over early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts for rapid visual acuity assessment. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006;54(3):214. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.27087
  13. Oduntan AO, Briggs ST. An Arabic letter distance visual acuity test chart for young children and illiterate adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19(5):431-437. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00454.x
  14. Siderov J, Osuobeni E, Sailoganathan A. A new Gujarati language logMAR visual acuity chart: Development and validation. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(10):557. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121069
  15. Varadharajan S, Srinivasan K, Kumaresan B. Construction and validation of a Tamil logMAR chart. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29(5):526-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00657.x
  16. Negiloni K, Mazumdar D, Neog A, Das B. Construction and validation of logMAR visual acuity charts in seven Indian languages. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(5):641-646. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1165_17
  17. Malyugin BE, Morozova TA, Fomina OV. Visual acuity measurement after multifocal correction. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2015;(4):163. (In Russ.)
  18. Aliev AA-G, Nurudinov MM, Magomedova MM. Analysis of authenticity of visual acuity measurement methods in patients with macular pathology. Tochka zreniya. Vostok—Zapad. 2018;(2). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25276/2410-1257-2018-2-84-86
  19. Rosser DA, Laidlaw DA, Murdoch IE. The development of a «reduced logMAR» visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(4):432-436. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.4.432
  20. Noushad B, Thomas J, Amin S. Reliability of a modified logMAR distant visual acuity chart for routine clinical use. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(2):87. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-620x.99370
  21. Laidlaw DA, Abbott A, Rosser DA. Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: Performance of the «compact reduced logMAR» visual acuity chart in amblyopic children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(10):1232-1234. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.10.1232
  22. Bailey I, Lovie J. The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980;6(57):378-387. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198006000-00011
  23. Legge G, Ross J, Luebker A, LaMay J. Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;12(66):843-853. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198912000-00008
  24. Patel P, Chen F, Da Cruz L, Rubin G, Tufail A. Test-retest variability of reading performance metrics using MNREAD in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(6):3854-3859. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6601
  25. Radner W, Obermayer W, Richter-Mueksch S, Willinger U, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B. The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240(6):461-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-002-0443-5
  26. Radner W. Reading charts in ophthalmology. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(8):1465-1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3659-0
  27. Hütz WW, Eckhardt HB, Röhrig B, Grolmus R. Reading ability with 3 multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(12):2015-2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.029
  28. Richter-Mueksch S, Kaminski S, Kuchar A, Stifter E, Velikay-Parel M, Radner W. Influence of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratectomy on patients’ reading performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(8):1544-1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.01.034
  29. Calabrèse A, Bernard JB, Hoffart L. Wet versus dry age-related macular degeneration in patients with central field loss: Different effects on maximum reading speed. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(5):2417-2424. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-5056
  30. Edington M, Morjaria R. Structural — Functional Correlation in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema. Retina. 2017;5(37):881-885. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000001266

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register


We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.