The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Doga A.V.

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, 59a Beskudnikovskiy blvd, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127486

Mushkova I.A.

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, 59a Beskudnikovskiy blvd, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127486

Karimova A.N.

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, 59a Beskudnikovskiy blvd, Moscow, Russian Federation, 127486

Kechin E.V.

S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center «MNTK «Eye Microsurgery», 59A Beskudnikovsky Blvd., Moscow, Russian Federation, 127486

Clinical and functional outcomes of correcting low to moderate myopia with FemtoLASIK performed with Russian and Swiss femtolaser platforms

Authors:

Doga A.V., Mushkova I.A., Karimova A.N., Kechin E.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(5): 13‑23

Read: 197 times


To cite this article:

Doga AV, Mushkova IA, Karimova AN, Kechin EV. Clinical and functional outcomes of correcting low to moderate myopia with FemtoLASIK performed with Russian and Swiss femtolaser platforms. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(5):13‑23. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913505113

Recommended articles:
Correction of myopia with implantable collamer lenses. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(2):5-15
Microbiota of the ocular surface in children with myopia. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(3):5-12

References:

  1. Mariotti SP. World Health Organization. Global data on visual impairments. Geneva. 2012.
  2. Neroev VV. Eye care management in Russian Federation. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2014;130(6):8-12. (In Russ.)
  3. Lundström M, Manning S, Barry P, Stenevi U, Henry Y, Rosen P. The European registry of quality outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery (EUREQUO): a database study of trends in volumes, surgical techniques and outcomes of refractive surgery. Eye and Vision. 2015;30(2):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-015-0019-1
  4. Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Stathi EZ, Frenschock O, Georgiadis A. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 1990;10(5):463-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900100511
  5. Solomon KD, Fernández de Castro LE, Sandoval HP, Biber JM, Groat B, Neff KD, Ying MS, French JW, Donnenfeld ED, Lindstrom RL; Joint LASIK Study Task Force. LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4):691-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.037
  6. Doga AV, Mushkova IA, Semenov AD, Karimova AN, Kechin EV. Stages of development and modern aspects of keratorefractive surgery. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2016;6(98):36-41. (In Russ.)
  7. Kostenev SV, Chernykh VV. Femtosekundnaya lazernaya hirurgiya: principy i primenenie v oftal’mologii. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 2012. (In Russ.)
  8. Kulikova IL, Pashtaev NP. Keratorefrakcionnaya lazernaya hirurgiya v reabilitacii detej i podrostkov s gipermetropicheskoj refrakciej. M.: Oftal’mologiya; 2012. (In Russ.)
  9. Pateeva TZ, Pashtaev NP. IntraLASIK and LASIK for myopia correction (comparative analysis). Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2010;5:4-12. (In Russ.)
  10. Solodkova EG, Fokin VP. Applications of SCHWIND AMARIS excimer laser in keratorefractive surgery. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2016;6(98):160-162. (In Russ.)
  11. Xia LK, Yu J, Chai GR, Wang D, Li Y. Comparison of the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for flap cutting in LASIK. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015;8(4):784-790. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.04.25
  12. Eydelman M, Hilmantel G, Tarver ME, Hofmeister EM, May J, Hammel K, Hays RD, Ferris F 3rd. Symptoms and Satisfaction of Patients in the Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL) Studies. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2017;135(1):13-22. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4587
  13. Egorov VV, Dutchin IV, Sorokin EL, Shishkin SA. The structure of refraction anomalies among patients, who are planning refraction surgery. Zdravoohranenie Dal’nego Vostoka. 2013;1(55):4-6. (In Russ.)
  14. Doga AV, Kachalina GF, Kishkin YuI. Comparative aberration analysis of LASIK operations performed on excimer laser systems «MicroScan» (Russia), «VisX Star S4» (USA) and «MEL 80» (Germany). Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2008;(4):18-22. (In Russ.)
  15. Doga AV, Borzenok SA, Mushkova IA, Karimova AN, Kechin EV, Shevlyagina NV. Qualitative assessment of the corneal stromal bed surface after the flap formation using different femtosecond laser systems. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2016;6(98):31-35. (In Russ.)
  16. Doga AV, Borzenok SA, Mushkova IA, Karimova AN, Kechin EV, Vartapetov SK, Shipunov AA, Frolov AA. Comparative analysis of femtosecond laser Femto Visum (Russia) and Femto LDV Z6 (Switzerland). A 3D-digital assessment of morphometric parameters of corneal flap in the experiment. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2017;2:36-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2017-2-36-44
  17. Doga AV, Mushkova IA, Karimova AN, Pateeva TZ, Kechin EV. Comparative evaluation of morphometric parameters of corneal valve after the technology «laser keratomileusis in situ» using different femtosecond laser systems. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2016;5(13):134-137. (In Russ.)
  18. Dupps WJ, Jr, Kohnen T, Mamalis N, Rosen ES, Koch DD, Obstbaum SA, Waring GO 3rd, Reinstein DZ, Stulting RD. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2011;37(1):1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.010
  19. Waring GO 3rd, Reinstein DZ, Dupps WJ Jr, Kohnen T, Mamalis N, Rosen ES, Koch DD, Obstbaum SA, Stulting RD. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2011;27(1):7-9. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20101116-01
  20. Doga AV, Mushkova IA, Karimova AN, Kechin EV, Semenov AD. Sposob ustraneniya neprozrachnogo puzyr’kovogo sloya, voznikayushchego v processe vypolneniya operacii FemtoLAZIK. Patent RF na izobretenie №2638687/15.12.17. Byul. №35. Accessed February 10, 2019. Available: at: http://www1.fips.ru/fips_servl/fips_servlet?DB=RUPAT&DocNumber=2638687&TypeFile=html (In Russ.)
  21. Sandoval HP, Donnenfeld ED, Kohnen T, Lindstrom RL, Potvin R, Tremblay DM, Solomon KD. Modern laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes. Journal of Cataractand Refractive Surgery. 2016;42(8):1224-1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.012
  22. Ang M, Mehta JS, Rosman M, Li L, Koh JC, Htoon HM, Tan D, Chan C. Visual outcomes comparison of 2 femtosecond laser platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2013;39(11):1647-1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.044
  23. Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Grentzelos MA, Panagopoulou SI, Stojanovic N, Kankariya VP, Henderson BA, Pallikaris IG. Thin-flap laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond-laser technology. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2013;39(9):1366-1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.024
  24. Torky MA, Al Zafiri YA, Khattab AM, Farag RK, Awad EA. Visumax femtolasik versus Moria M2 microkeratome in mild to moderate myopia: efficacy, safety, predictability, aberrometric changes and flap thickness predictability. BMC Ophthalmology. 2017;17(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0520-5
  25. Anderle R, Ventruba J, Skorkovská S. Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided myopic femtosecond LASIK. Ceská a Slovenská Oftalmologie. 2015;71(1):44-50.
  26. Tomita M, Yoshida Y, Yamamoto Y, Mita M, Waring G 4th. In vivo confocal laser microscopy of morphologic changes after simultaneous LASIK and accelerated collagen crosslinking for myopia: one-year results. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2014;40(6):981-990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.044
  27. Yu CQ, Manche EE. Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for flap creation in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2015;41(4):740-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.038
  28. Huang D, Arif M. Spot size and quality of scanning laser correction of higher-order wavefront aberrations. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2002;28(3):407-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01163-4
  29. Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z, Garufis C, Duh YJ, Soltes CR, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2005;31(1):97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.037
  30. Vinciguerra P, Azzolini M, Airaghi P, Radice P, De Molfetta V. Effect of decreasing surface and interface irregularities after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis on optical and functional outcomes. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 1998;14(2 suppl):199-203. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-19980401-12

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.