Analytical and synthesizing part of the forensic expert panel conclusion: a case study of professional violation of healthcare professionals

Khalikov A.A.; Galimov A.R.; Agzamov V.V.; Kuznetsov K.O.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/sudmed20226504164

Khalikov A.A.

Bashkir State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0003-1045-5677

Galimov A.R.

Bashkir State Medical University;
Forensic Consulting

Agzamov V.V.

Bashkir State Medical University

Kuznetsov K.O.

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-2405-1801

Analytical and synthesizing part of the forensic expert panel conclusion: a case study of professional violation of healthcare professionals

Authors:

Khalikov A.A., Galimov A.R., Agzamov V.V., Kuznetsov K.O.

More about the authors

Journal: Forensic Medical Expertise. 2022;65(4): 64‑68

DOI: 10.17116/sudmed20226504164

Read: 1432 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Khalikov AA, Galimov AR, Agzamov VV, Kuznetsov KO. Analytical and synthesizing part of the forensic expert panel conclusion: a case study of professional violation of healthcare professionals. Forensic Medical Expertise. 2022;65(4):64‑68. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/sudmed20226504164

Подписка 2026 Судебно-медицинская экспертиза (Forensic Medical Expertise)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Abstract:

The objective of the study is to develop scientific criteria for the analytical and synthesizing part of the expert report on ‘medical cases.’ We studied 15 conclusions of expert panels. The following research methods were used: logical and analytical, logical and synthetic (generalization), comparative, systemic and analytical (analysis of relations between facts). For the first time, a new algorithm for the analytical and synthesizing part of the expert report was proposed; and also ways to improve the quality of forensic reports for all types of expert examinations, including those involving non-state forensic experts, were described. These improvements make the results of expert examinations and reviews more convenient and objective. They are intended for non-state forensic experts, attorneys who use them, and state forensic experts, including during the training and professional development.

Keywords:

healthcare providers malpractice

commissioned forensic examination/investigation

causal relationship

analysis and synthesis

non-state forensic examination

structured report

Authors:

Khalikov A.A.

Bashkir State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0003-1045-5677

Galimov A.R.

Bashkir State Medical University;
Forensic Consulting

Agzamov V.V.

Bashkir State Medical University

Kuznetsov K.O.

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-2405-1801

Received:

08.12.2021

Accepted:

12.01.2022

Close metadata

References:

Ardashkin AP, Zhigalkin AV, Ponomarev EV. The analytical-synthesizing part of an expert judgment. Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertisa. 2014;57(5):25-27. (In Russ.).
Bereznikov AV. Sudebno-meditsinskaya otsenka defektov okazaniya terapevticheskoy pomoshchi: Dis. ... d-ra med. nauk. M. 2011. (In Russ.).
Elistratova IV. Ekspertiza defektov okazaniya dermatovenerologicheskoy pomoshchi: Dis. ... kand. med. nauk. M. 2008. (In Russ.).
Zaharov SO. Ekspertnyu analiz pri proizvodstve sudebno-meditsinskikh ekspertiz po materialam ugolovnykh i grazhdanskikh del, svyazannykh s nenadlezhashchim ispolneniem meditsinskimi rabotnikami professional’nykh obyazannostey: Dis. ... kand. med. nauk. M. 2005.
Miheeva NA. Kriterii ekspertnoy otsenki oshibok i neblagopriyatnykh iskhodov v praktike plasticheskoy khirurgii: Dis. ... kand. med. nauk. M. 2011. (In Russ.).
Ostrovskaya EV. Osobennosti provedeniya sudebno-meditsinskikh ekspertiz v sluchayakh professional’nykh pravonarusheniy meditsinskikh rabotnikov: Dis. ... kand. med. nauk. M. 2002. (In Russ.).
Popova TG. Kriterii ekspertnoy otsenki professional’nykh oshibok i defektov okazaniya meditsinskoy pomoshchi na vsekh etapakh stomatologicheskogo lecheniya: Dis. ... d-ra med. nauk. M. 2008. (In Russ.).
Kulikov SN. Elements of intensification of the process of forensic expert assessment of the circumstances of medical activity. Sudebnaya meditsina. 2017;3(3):13-17. (In Russ.).
Jurasov VV, Smahtin RE. On the issue of the procedure for conducting forensic medical examinations on so-called «medical cases». Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2016;16(1-2):49-51. (In Russ).
Malinin VB, Parfenov AF. Objektivnaya storona prestupleniya. SPb.: Izd-vo Yuridicheskogo instituta (Sankt-Peterburg); 2004. (In Russ.).
Nedugov GV, Nedugova VV. Veroyatnostnye analiticheskie tekhnologii v sudebnoy meditsine: bazovye matematicheskie modeli i prakticheskie prilozheniya. Samara: Ofort; 2009.